25-Apr-2024 11:24 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Events] What we saw at SoCal...ANN.lu
Posted on 23-Nov-2003 20:34 GMT by bbrv147 comments
View flat
View list

After the Pegasos of course, the big story at SoCal was Novell and IBM. :-D "IBM will support SuSE and what will be left of Redhat," said the leading IBM rep at the Show. In the meanwhile, the Novell booth brought a air of credibility to what was the largest show other than CES that we have participated. Novell has assembled a complete Linux stack. People want it. Novell is providing it. If anyone is missing the "Linux is coming to a Desktop Near You" story, they should even avoid WrongPla.net, much less ANN.

The time is NOW.

If you are a Developer and you have something to offer get on the bandwagon of your choice (or both). The Linux Desktop *is* the Trojan Horse for this Community. Don't miss the boat! And, BTW, let us be bold enough to suggest that IBM will very likely be selling the Pegasos one day (or something like it) as a thin client in a total system package. Why the Dell not?! IBM sells services. When they sell an enterprise network to a corporate customer they often continue to “own” the entire system. The customer contracts for the entire package. IBM insures that everything is working and that the latest and greatest is there running as it should. Why should IBM continue to sell a PC when they begin to promote a Linux desktop? First, they throw out Windows (replaced with Linux) and then the Intel-based CPU/PC can be replaced with a PowerPC based system that runs on an IBM CPU. All IBM is doing is connecting the dots from client desktop to enterprise network and ultimately to the "GRID" that IBM now extols (the Matrix is coming!).

And, while we are at it beyond the "Matrix" -- not only are the major game consoles moving to the PowerPC, it is also the CPU found in the most advance DTV receivers (satellite or terrestrial). The latest one from Disney is called MovieBeam. Imagine a Super TiVo (PowerPC too BTW) using an expanded version of AmiNetRV (radio and video) and all integrated into a MPlayer-like UI that would do to a TV set what MP3 did to music. Now, that is really any show any time. TV signals digital or analogue can be integrated, but the Internet is the foundation of the future in this arena in our opinion. While we are at it since that MP3 player will not play high fidelity sound why not use that 24/7 broadband Internet connection to get that home stereo equipment back in the game too!

Final note: Pegasos II sales have passed the 1500 unit mark. These are the combined sales based on Reseller, Internet, and institutional/corporate orders. Congratulations to Thomas Knäbel and Gerald Carda. Your years of hard work and dedication are paying off and thanks to you we have the fundamental ingredient required to march forward to our future.

R&B :-)

P.S. This week "will be IBM week." ;-)

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Wayne HuntRegistered user23-Nov-2003 20:13 GMT
Comment 2Rich Woods23-Nov-2003 20:35 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous23-Nov-2003 20:42 GMT
Comment 4Sam Smith23-Nov-2003 21:10 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous23-Nov-2003 21:32 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous23-Nov-2003 21:41 GMT
Comment 7Blueish-red troll23-Nov-2003 21:50 GMT
Comment 8AdmV23-Nov-2003 23:11 GMT
Comment 9bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 01:24 GMT
Comment 10Wayne HuntRegistered user24-Nov-2003 02:01 GMT
Comment 11tarbos24-Nov-2003 04:13 GMT
Comment 12priest24-Nov-2003 06:27 GMT
Comment 13samface24-Nov-2003 08:18 GMT
Comment 14Christian KempRegistered user24-Nov-2003 08:30 GMT
Comment 15takemehomegrandmaRegistered user24-Nov-2003 08:47 GMT
Comment 16mahenRegistered user24-Nov-2003 08:55 GMT
Comment 17DaveP24-Nov-2003 09:23 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous24-Nov-2003 09:23 GMT
Comment 19Sam Smith24-Nov-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 20mahenRegistered user24-Nov-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 21Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 10:09 GMT
Comment 22minator24-Nov-2003 10:12 GMT
Comment 23Don CoxRegistered user24-Nov-2003 10:12 GMT
Comment 24Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 10:24 GMT
Comment 25bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 10:32 GMT
Comment 26Coder24-Nov-2003 10:38 GMT
Comment 27samface24-Nov-2003 10:40 GMT
Comment 28bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 10:51 GMT
Comment 29samface24-Nov-2003 10:53 GMT
Comment 30bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 10:58 GMT
Comment 31samface24-Nov-2003 11:02 GMT
Comment 32Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 11:05 GMT
Comment 33AdmV24-Nov-2003 11:10 GMT
Comment 34AdmV24-Nov-2003 11:15 GMT
Comment 35bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 11:16 GMT
Comment 36bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 11:19 GMT
Comment 37Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 11:30 GMT
Comment 38samface24-Nov-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 39bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 11:45 GMT
Comment 40AdmV24-Nov-2003 11:50 GMT
Comment 41bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 11:59 GMT
Comment 42minator24-Nov-2003 11:59 GMT
Comment 43samface24-Nov-2003 12:03 GMT
Comment 44DaveP24-Nov-2003 12:10 GMT
Comment 45samface24-Nov-2003 12:19 GMT
Comment 46bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 12:23 GMT
Comment 47Anonymously24-Nov-2003 12:24 GMT
Comment 48DaveP24-Nov-2003 12:30 GMT
Comment 49samface24-Nov-2003 12:30 GMT
Comment 50DaveP24-Nov-2003 12:31 GMT
Comment 51bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 12:33 GMT
Comment 52AdmV24-Nov-2003 12:37 GMT
Comment 53Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 12:39 GMT
Comment 54samface24-Nov-2003 12:47 GMT
Comment 55Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 12:52 GMT
Comment 56bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 12:55 GMT
Comment 57samface24-Nov-2003 13:02 GMT
Comment 58Anonymous24-Nov-2003 13:03 GMT
Comment 59DaveP24-Nov-2003 13:04 GMT
Comment 60bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 13:13 GMT
Comment 61bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 13:15 GMT
Comment 62samface24-Nov-2003 13:17 GMT
Comment 63samface24-Nov-2003 13:20 GMT
Comment 64Sam Smith24-Nov-2003 13:21 GMT
Comment 65bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 13:24 GMT
Comment 66Coder24-Nov-2003 13:38 GMT
Comment 67Anonymous24-Nov-2003 13:39 GMT
Comment 68bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 13:47 GMT
Comment 69bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 13:52 GMT
Comment 70samface24-Nov-2003 14:03 GMT
Comment 71DaveP24-Nov-2003 14:03 GMT
Comment 72Wayne HuntRegistered user24-Nov-2003 14:06 GMT
Comment 73samface24-Nov-2003 14:07 GMT
Comment 74takemehomegrandmaRegistered user24-Nov-2003 14:08 GMT
Comment 75takemehomegrandmaRegistered user24-Nov-2003 14:14 GMT
Comment 76AdmV24-Nov-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 77bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 78samface24-Nov-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 79Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 14:27 GMT
Comment 80bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 14:29 GMT
Comment 81Wayne HuntRegistered user24-Nov-2003 14:38 GMT
Comment 82cecilia24-Nov-2003 14:40 GMT
Comment 83SenexRegistered user24-Nov-2003 15:20 GMT
Comment 84bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 15:34 GMT
Comment 85Matt Parsons24-Nov-2003 15:35 GMT
Comment 86Anonymous24-Nov-2003 15:36 GMT
Comment 87bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 15:41 GMT
Comment 88MIKE24-Nov-2003 16:11 GMT
Comment 89SenexRegistered user24-Nov-2003 16:20 GMT
Comment 90MIKE24-Nov-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 91MIKE24-Nov-2003 16:39 GMT
Comment 92Linux Sucks24-Nov-2003 16:44 GMT
Comment 93Stephane Desrosiers24-Nov-2003 16:55 GMT
Comment 94SenexRegistered user24-Nov-2003 17:17 GMT
Comment 95Gunne Steen24-Nov-2003 17:30 GMT
Comment 96Eva24-Nov-2003 17:37 GMT
Comment 97AdmV24-Nov-2003 18:17 GMT
Comment 98Stephane Desrosiers24-Nov-2003 18:42 GMT
Comment 99IanSRegistered user24-Nov-2003 19:25 GMT
Comment 100bbrvRegistered user24-Nov-2003 19:41 GMT
Comment 101Sam Smith24-Nov-2003 20:28 GMT
Comment 102Amon_ReRegistered user24-Nov-2003 20:46 GMT
Comment 103JoannaK24-Nov-2003 20:47 GMT
Comment 104Jimbo24-Nov-2003 21:54 GMT
Comment 105Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2003 23:10 GMT
Comment 106Muuh24-Nov-2003 23:17 GMT
Comment 107Muuh25-Nov-2003 00:10 GMT
Comment 108Wayne HuntRegistered user25-Nov-2003 00:37 GMT
Comment 109Bill Hoggett25-Nov-2003 00:41 GMT
Comment 110bbrvRegistered user25-Nov-2003 02:07 GMT
Comment 111Stephane Desrosiers25-Nov-2003 02:45 GMT
Comment 112Sam Smith25-Nov-2003 08:05 GMT
Comment 113AdmV25-Nov-2003 08:30 GMT
Comment 114bbrvRegistered user25-Nov-2003 11:22 GMT
Comment 115AdmV25-Nov-2003 11:35 GMT
Comment 116samface25-Nov-2003 12:02 GMT
Comment 117samface25-Nov-2003 12:13 GMT
Comment 118bbrvRegistered user25-Nov-2003 12:17 GMT
Comment 119Bill Hoggett25-Nov-2003 14:02 GMT
Comment 120samface25-Nov-2003 16:14 GMT
Comment 121samface25-Nov-2003 16:45 GMT
Comment 122Gunne Steen25-Nov-2003 19:16 GMT
Comment 123Gunne Steen25-Nov-2003 19:19 GMT
Comment 124Bill Hoggett26-Nov-2003 00:02 GMT
Comment 125samface26-Nov-2003 02:15 GMT
Comment 126Stephane Desrosiers26-Nov-2003 02:19 GMT
Comment 127samface26-Nov-2003 02:33 GMT
Comment 128bbrvRegistered user26-Nov-2003 03:17 GMT
Comment 129Bill Hoggett26-Nov-2003 09:24 GMT
What we saw at SoCal... : Comment 130 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by samface on 26-Nov-2003 10:24 GMT
In reply to Comment 129 (Bill Hoggett):
Excuses? I made several points about Linux mysterious and unneccessary complexity that you completely ignore and then you insist on me trying to simplify the workings of AmigaOS. I'm sorry but you're really not beeing very reasonable here.

Again, care to explain to me how I should go about error analyzing the start up sequence of Linux? I'll give you a (bill) buck if you can show me a way as easy as uncommenting each and every automaticly started exectutable in the startup sequence.

I would also like you to explain to me the mysterious file hierarchy of Linux and why there is so many different "lib"s and "bin"s? Why make the process' of programs a part of the file system (ie /proc)? How do I locate that application I installed the other day, was it in /usr/lib/ or maybe /usr/share/bin? Why is it that some applications will not work because a dependency is too new(?) and in order to satisfy that dependancy, I have to downgrade the entire system as well as deinstall another application which also happens to be a dependency of the application that I'm currently trying to install (yes, this happens quite often)? I mean, in AmigaOS there are no dependencies to satisfy what so ever (except the ones of the applications, of course) and in case of an old library, the application informs you and all you have to do is get a newer one from Aminet and place it in LIBS:. Why can't things be just as easy in Linux?

I'm telling you, there is *nothing* made easy in Linux unless you never install any applications in addition to what came with your distro, always stick with configuring whatever your X-window manager is able to configure for you, and never ever run into problems. My reasons for saying this has nothing do with me beeing more used to AmigaOS since it's actually the other way around. It's because I do have experience with Linux that I regard myself as competent of making this judgement. I also believe there are Linux users that has been working with it for so long that they have forgot what user-friendliness means while happily bragging about their achivement of finally having full control over their Linux installation after two years of studying it's inner workings. Neither do they hesitate to patronize the avarage "I agree-next-next-next-done" Windows user without realizing that not everyone has the time to take such an active interest in the OS and just wants to go ahead with using that specific application that just happens to require Windows.
Jump...
#133 bbrv #137 Gunne Steen
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 131Gunne Steen26-Nov-2003 12:11 GMT
Comment 132samface26-Nov-2003 14:13 GMT
Comment 133bbrvRegistered user26-Nov-2003 14:35 GMT
Comment 134Stephane Desrosiers26-Nov-2003 15:44 GMT
Comment 135bbrvRegistered user26-Nov-2003 18:38 GMT
Comment 136Gunne Steen26-Nov-2003 18:41 GMT
Comment 137Gunne Steen26-Nov-2003 19:08 GMT
Comment 138samface26-Nov-2003 19:17 GMT
Comment 139samface26-Nov-2003 20:39 GMT
Comment 140Bill Hoggett26-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 141samface26-Nov-2003 20:41 GMT
Comment 142Gunne Steen26-Nov-2003 20:43 GMT
Comment 143Gunne Steen26-Nov-2003 20:52 GMT
Comment 144samface26-Nov-2003 20:56 GMT
Comment 145samface26-Nov-2003 21:00 GMT
Comment 146AdmV27-Nov-2003 21:11 GMT
Comment 147Unhappy Investor28-Nov-2003 08:18 GMT
Back to Top