03-Dec-2024 01:31 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] ...another interesting articleANN.lu
Posted on 30-Nov-2003 18:32 GMT by bbrv56 comments
View flat
View list
Here is a New York Times Magazine article about Apple, the iPod, marketing, product development and management. We contend that this Community can produce a Super TiVo-like device that integrates the network into the use of the content itself. The Pegasos is building block #1 to any competent computing environment and the necessary tool required by the developer support enlisted to customize the platform for consumer use. A Pegasos computer is a desktop machine. A Pegasos computer enclosed in a fan-less VCR-like size case becomes a consumer product: a black box. The Pegasos black box operates equally well with a television screen or a computer monitor. The Pegasos black box could come with its own file sharing and downloading programs -- music, movies, video games – a preference is selected, a source found, the entertainment begins. The technology would be invisible to the entertainment experience. The consumer manages the experience through an easily understood user interface with a remote control or through a web browser and a keyboard for more sophisticated users. As the hub of the Home Entertainment Center high fidelity sound/audio can now be introduced through the 24/7 broadband Internet connection to bring existing home stereo equipment back into use. Here the Pegasos black box can be positioned to be a consumer product that would do to a TV set what MP3 did to music – any show any time.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1David S Lund30-Nov-2003 17:42 GMT
Comment 2Christian KempRegistered user30-Nov-2003 17:53 GMT
Comment 3shut the f&^%& up30-Nov-2003 18:08 GMT
Comment 4Martin Blom30-Nov-2003 18:08 GMT
...another interesting article : Comment 5 of 56ANN.lu
Posted by Kermit Woodall on 30-Nov-2003 18:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Christian Kemp):
Friends of mine were involved in Anthony Wood's (former Amiga developer aka:Sunrize) ReplayTV (the original TiVo) and involved with Applied Magic's Screenplay nonlinear editing appliance.

Why mention these? Because TiVo and Screenplay and many other computer-like appliances are based on PowerPC chips. Prized for their low power consumption, low heat, and high performance.

The key in all of these devices has been to build a consumer-oriented device that has an interface that is EASY to use without compromising on power. In fact, the better the interface is at bringing power to the user without making it hard to use - the more popular the device can become.

Replay/TiVo are prime examples. They're easy to use as their interfaces resemble the channel guide on a digital cable/satellite box. They use the remote control conventions of a VCR to add recording/playback functionality.

A SuperTiVo already exists in many 'geek' hands. Linux projects like FreeVIO and others have merged TiVo functionality with the WebTV/Internet concepts, DVD, MP3 player, online video streaming (still not that great if you want realtime) and even some basic video editing and DVD burning.

It's not a bad concept - even if these geek devices cost thousands to put together by hand and use PCs with high heat/power requirements.

I know my use of ReplayTV has already made my DVD player feel crippled because I can't easily jump back 10 seconds or skip over unwanted sections with the same ease of the interface of the ReplayTV. I know why these Linux guys spent all the time developing FreeVIO (and other) packages and spend so much to make these ideal systems.

ReplayTV talked about how their system put YOU in control of TV at last. TiVo is echoing that same sentiment now. Being in control of all my home media is very attractive. It would be even better if I didn't have to have three boxes on top of my TV to do it all. And three remotes. (it can still be hard to find an all-in-one remote that cleanly works with ReplayTV _and_ a DVD player)

Robert Heinlein, SF author, saw this back in the 50's. He described a home communications center that controlled telephone, tv, and more and could easily bring all the data you wanted together (voice, video, print) and give you what you wanted WITHOUT commercials and the ability to skip what you didn't want as it came up. (hell - that might invalidate a few hundred patents on the basis of 'prior art' right there) His characters could scan for news/information on subjects and get listings of everything they wanted to select to read or view or listen to under their control.

The future is here, we're living in it, the gadgets are just an interface design away!

Kermit
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 6Johan Rönnblom30-Nov-2003 18:22 GMT
Comment 7bbrvRegistered user30-Nov-2003 18:29 GMT
Comment 8Coder30-Nov-2003 18:33 GMT
Comment 9Trizt30-Nov-2003 19:06 GMT
Comment 10Coder30-Nov-2003 19:09 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous30-Nov-2003 19:10 GMT
Comment 12bbrvRegistered user30-Nov-2003 19:14 GMT
Comment 13bbrvRegistered user30-Nov-2003 19:19 GMT
Comment 14Trizt30-Nov-2003 19:32 GMT
Comment 15Mr. Anonymous30-Nov-2003 19:52 GMT
Comment 16Trizt30-Nov-2003 20:01 GMT
Comment 17Christian KempRegistered user30-Nov-2003 20:06 GMT
Comment 18JoannaK30-Nov-2003 20:21 GMT
Comment 19Trizt30-Nov-2003 20:23 GMT
Comment 20Christian KempRegistered user30-Nov-2003 20:29 GMT
Comment 21Amon_ReRegistered user30-Nov-2003 20:43 GMT
Comment 22bbrvRegistered user30-Nov-2003 20:48 GMT
Comment 23minator30-Nov-2003 21:06 GMT
Comment 24Johan Rönnblom30-Nov-2003 21:54 GMT
Comment 25Kolbjørn Barmen30-Nov-2003 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Johan Rönnblom30-Nov-2003 22:03 GMT
Comment 27bbrvRegistered user30-Nov-2003 22:20 GMT
Comment 28Amon_ReRegistered user30-Nov-2003 22:23 GMT
Comment 29Amon_ReRegistered user30-Nov-2003 22:26 GMT
Comment 30Amon_ReRegistered user30-Nov-2003 22:26 GMT
Comment 31Darth_X30-Nov-2003 22:48 GMT
Comment 32Kolbjørn Barmen30-Nov-2003 22:49 GMT
Comment 33Kolbjørn Barmen30-Nov-2003 22:51 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous30-Nov-2003 22:52 GMT
Comment 35Amon_ReRegistered user30-Nov-2003 23:05 GMT
Comment 36Daniel Miller30-Nov-2003 23:09 GMT
Comment 37Oppressor01-Dec-2003 00:50 GMT
Comment 38Darth_X01-Dec-2003 01:07 GMT
Comment 39Darth_X01-Dec-2003 01:11 GMT
Comment 40bbrvRegistered user01-Dec-2003 01:51 GMT
Comment 41smp26601-Dec-2003 09:02 GMT
Comment 42Trizt01-Dec-2003 09:30 GMT
Comment 43Trizt01-Dec-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 44Daniel Miller01-Dec-2003 09:50 GMT
Comment 45Daniel Miller01-Dec-2003 10:31 GMT
Comment 46Oppressor01-Dec-2003 11:26 GMT
Comment 47Trizt01-Dec-2003 12:03 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous01-Dec-2003 14:12 GMT
Comment 49minator01-Dec-2003 14:14 GMT
Comment 50Trizt01-Dec-2003 14:35 GMT
Comment 51kalmar01-Dec-2003 14:37 GMT
Comment 52TarghanRegistered user01-Dec-2003 15:36 GMT
Comment 53minator01-Dec-2003 15:49 GMT
Comment 54Trizt01-Dec-2003 16:46 GMT
Comment 55minator02-Dec-2003 09:15 GMT
Comment 56Martin Blom03-Dec-2003 08:31 GMT
Back to Top