[News] Thendic-Amiga Court Docs - 12/12/2003 - Last Day? | ANN.lu |
Posted on 03-Dec-2003 04:47 GMT by Rich Woods (Edited on 2003-12-03 08:45:21 GMT by Christian Kemp) | 128 comments View flat View list |
ORDER CONTINUING 31 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Defendant's request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion is granted in part.
Plaintiffs' motion is renoted for 12/12/2003. Any opposition is due no later than 4:30 p.m. on Monday, December 8, 2003. Any reply is due not later than 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, December 11, 2003. (KERR, ) (Entered: 12/02/2003)
Get the doc Here
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Thendic-Amiga Court Docs - 12/12/2003 - Last Day? : Comment 101 of 128 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Rich Woods on 05-Dec-2003 19:33 GMT | In reply to Comment 94 (Virgil): Posted by Virgil (209.128.195.4) on 05-Dec-2003 18:32:10
In Reply to Comment 93 (Tigger):
The relevant word here is " if ". Until the 12th., the dog is still alive.
Judge Lansky could suffer a heart attack etc., etc.
To what extent is there a risk that the determination of the preliminary issue could lead to an application for the Pleadings being ammended so as to avoid the consquences of the determination? It would be very hard to deprive a party of the opportunity to amend when that amendment would keep the claim alive. This form of judgement leaves itself open to challange under the Human Rights Act 2000 and the principles of what is just and fair must be carefully considered. .. Mr. Justice Neuberger.. Steele vs Steele.
Chances are however, slim to none, the dog is seriously ill. But, so is the future of the Amiga computer and operating system. The baby is being thrown out with the bath water.
-------------------------------
Also - if ANY application for the pleading to be AMENDED it should have ALREADY been done by amiga's lawyers - WHEN THEY HAD THEM.
You post some quote on law out of context and expect people to believe you have some legal knowledge when the point of law has NO application in this case.
Human Right Act 2000 - what does this case have to do with the Human Rights Act.
Totally a troll, totally out of context and totally witout meanaig concerning THIS current court case.
YOU'VE BEEN EXPOSED FOR THE TROLL THAT YOU ARE! |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|