28-Mar-2024 18:42 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Thendic-Amiga Court Docs - 12/12/2003 - Last Day?ANN.lu
Posted on 03-Dec-2003 04:47 GMT by Rich Woods (Edited on 2003-12-03 08:45:21 GMT by Christian Kemp)128 comments
View flat
View list
ORDER CONTINUING 31 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Defendant's request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion is granted in part. Plaintiffs' motion is renoted for 12/12/2003. Any opposition is due no later than 4:30 p.m. on Monday, December 8, 2003. Any reply is due not later than 4:30 p.m. on Thursday, December 11, 2003. (KERR, ) (Entered: 12/02/2003)

Get the doc Here

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 04:06 GMT
Comment 2Ronald03-Dec-2003 04:17 GMT
Comment 3Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 04:21 GMT
Comment 4hooligan/dcsRegistered user03-Dec-2003 04:23 GMT
Comment 5Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 04:29 GMT
Comment 6hooligan/dcsRegistered user03-Dec-2003 05:10 GMT
Comment 7Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 05:22 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous03-Dec-2003 06:37 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous03-Dec-2003 06:39 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous03-Dec-2003 07:29 GMT
Comment 11Volmer03-Dec-2003 08:19 GMT
Comment 12Don CoxRegistered user03-Dec-2003 08:27 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous03-Dec-2003 08:42 GMT
Comment 14Rik Sweeney03-Dec-2003 08:57 GMT
Comment 15SenexRegistered user03-Dec-2003 09:15 GMT
Comment 16priest03-Dec-2003 09:20 GMT
Comment 17Atheist203-Dec-2003 09:43 GMT
Comment 18Jupp303-Dec-2003 10:02 GMT
Comment 19Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 10:37 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous03-Dec-2003 10:38 GMT
Comment 21Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 10:40 GMT
Comment 22Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 10:48 GMT
Comment 23Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 10:49 GMT
Comment 24Amon_ReRegistered user03-Dec-2003 11:13 GMT
Comment 25Bodie03-Dec-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous03-Dec-2003 13:12 GMT
Comment 27samface03-Dec-2003 13:36 GMT
Comment 28hooligan/dcsRegistered user03-Dec-2003 13:46 GMT
Comment 29Tigger03-Dec-2003 14:11 GMT
Comment 30NekoRegistered user03-Dec-2003 15:30 GMT
Comment 31NekoRegistered user03-Dec-2003 15:44 GMT
Comment 32samface03-Dec-2003 16:11 GMT
Comment 33Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user03-Dec-2003 16:19 GMT
Comment 34nahda03-Dec-2003 16:23 GMT
Comment 35samface03-Dec-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous03-Dec-2003 16:39 GMT
Comment 37Piru03-Dec-2003 16:41 GMT
Comment 38samface03-Dec-2003 16:41 GMT
Comment 39Rich Woods03-Dec-2003 17:53 GMT
Comment 40hooligan/dcsRegistered user03-Dec-2003 20:12 GMT
Comment 41hooligan/dcsRegistered user03-Dec-2003 20:13 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous03-Dec-2003 20:57 GMT
Comment 43Amon_ReRegistered user03-Dec-2003 21:14 GMT
Comment 44smithy03-Dec-2003 21:25 GMT
Comment 45JoannaK03-Dec-2003 21:38 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous03-Dec-2003 22:29 GMT
Comment 47Gregg03-Dec-2003 23:01 GMT
Comment 48Lando03-Dec-2003 23:11 GMT
Comment 49greenboyRegistered user03-Dec-2003 23:54 GMT
Comment 50Bodie04-Dec-2003 00:10 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous04-Dec-2003 00:15 GMT
Comment 52Bodie04-Dec-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 53MarkTime04-Dec-2003 00:46 GMT
Comment 54MIKE04-Dec-2003 00:51 GMT
Comment 55das04-Dec-2003 01:06 GMT
Comment 56ANONYMOUSFREEDOM04-Dec-2003 01:08 GMT
Thendic-Amiga Court Docs - 12/12/2003 - Last Day? : Comment 57 of 128ANN.lu
Posted by MarkTime on 04-Dec-2003 01:22 GMT
In reply to Comment 47 (Gregg):
AmigaOS had some wonderful ideas, but it is also woefully behind the times now. I think the compatibility with ancient apps is not as important anymore, even if it truly did need some in order to establish itself as the successor to the amiga legacy.

But now, we need to see innovation, while having some features that all OS's should have and the market takes for granted.

And thats hard, even irix has a port of openoffice.org. a port of Gimp. a port of imagemagicks, etc. etc.

The market has changed, and people expect to have a lot of apps as bog standard. AmigaOS or MorphOS has to have all that, just to be a boring, uninteresting also-ran.

After that, the fun begins.

But I think the good news is, that we can have all those things, and go back to innovating and being leading edge, because the Amiga community can rally around innovation and is not as beholden to old ideas.

I don't really care about the MorphOS/HyperionOS feud, because its this community that is the important thing. And if neither of those groups embrace the community, then maybe it'll just be AROS instead.

But I think to a certain extent there has been an outreach by Genesi towards the community and we can see the community starting to rally.

If my some impossible to imagine scenario, Hyperion wanted to sell their work on os4 to Genesi, and Genesi wanted to buy it, and it became the foundation for MorphOS, or was still called AmigaOS, I think that would be just great.

Both OS's...I've never seen OS 4, but they both seem to be about the same level, so I don't think it really matters. The vast majority of the work hasn't begun yet...

But I have a very real sense of optimism and hope that the work is about to begin.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 58Anonymous04-Dec-2003 02:02 GMT
Comment 59Rich Woods04-Dec-2003 02:32 GMT
Comment 60Rich Woods04-Dec-2003 02:34 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous04-Dec-2003 04:00 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous04-Dec-2003 04:36 GMT
Comment 63Mr. Anonymous (Trusted User)04-Dec-2003 04:57 GMT
Comment 64Amon_ReRegistered user04-Dec-2003 08:10 GMT
Comment 65Amon_ReRegistered user04-Dec-2003 08:17 GMT
Comment 66Amon_ReRegistered user04-Dec-2003 08:20 GMT
Comment 67Amon_ReRegistered user04-Dec-2003 08:23 GMT
Comment 68Amon_ReRegistered user04-Dec-2003 08:23 GMT
Comment 69Atheist204-Dec-2003 08:38 GMT
Comment 70Anonymous04-Dec-2003 09:46 GMT
Comment 71Abuse04-Dec-2003 12:25 GMT
Comment 72Gregg04-Dec-2003 12:37 GMT
Comment 73Jack04-Dec-2003 12:52 GMT
Comment 74Michael Steffan04-Dec-2003 12:58 GMT
Comment 75Matt ParsonsRegistered user04-Dec-2003 13:27 GMT
Comment 76Virgil04-Dec-2003 14:31 GMT
Comment 77Anonymous04-Dec-2003 14:41 GMT
Comment 78Anonymous04-Dec-2003 14:44 GMT
Comment 79Anonymous04-Dec-2003 14:49 GMT
Comment 80Norrin_Radd04-Dec-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 81Matt ParsonsRegistered user04-Dec-2003 15:31 GMT
Comment 82Stephane Desrosiers04-Dec-2003 15:37 GMT
Comment 83Tigger04-Dec-2003 16:07 GMT
Comment 84minator04-Dec-2003 16:17 GMT
Comment 85Virgil04-Dec-2003 16:46 GMT
Comment 86Anonymous04-Dec-2003 17:28 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods04-Dec-2003 19:23 GMT
Comment 88Rich Woods04-Dec-2003 19:26 GMT
Comment 89Alpha04-Dec-2003 20:18 GMT
Comment 90Atheist204-Dec-2003 23:12 GMT
Comment 91Atheist204-Dec-2003 23:18 GMT
Comment 92Virgil05-Dec-2003 15:15 GMT
Comment 93Tigger05-Dec-2003 16:15 GMT
Comment 94Virgil05-Dec-2003 17:32 GMT
Comment 95Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 19:08 GMT
Comment 96Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 19:09 GMT
Comment 97Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 19:11 GMT
Comment 98Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 19:19 GMT
Comment 99Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 19:21 GMT
Comment 100Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 19:26 GMT
Comment 101Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 19:33 GMT
Comment 102Tigger05-Dec-2003 20:05 GMT
Comment 103Rich Woods05-Dec-2003 22:11 GMT
Comment 104Virgil05-Dec-2003 22:18 GMT
Comment 105Virgil05-Dec-2003 22:33 GMT
Comment 106Virgil05-Dec-2003 22:39 GMT
Comment 107Virgil05-Dec-2003 22:46 GMT
Comment 108Virgil05-Dec-2003 22:55 GMT
Comment 109Virgil05-Dec-2003 23:00 GMT
Comment 110Virgil05-Dec-2003 23:03 GMT
Comment 111Virgil05-Dec-2003 23:31 GMT
Comment 112Virgil05-Dec-2003 23:42 GMT
Comment 113Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 12:32 GMT
Comment 114Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 12:34 GMT
Comment 115Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 12:36 GMT
Comment 116Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 12:37 GMT
Comment 117Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 12:39 GMT
Comment 118Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 12:41 GMT
Comment 119Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 12:48 GMT
Comment 120samface06-Dec-2003 13:24 GMT
Comment 121Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 13:31 GMT
Comment 122Virgil06-Dec-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 123Rich Woods06-Dec-2003 14:26 GMT
Comment 124Virgil06-Dec-2003 14:38 GMT
Comment 125Virgil06-Dec-2003 14:39 GMT
Comment 126Virgil06-Dec-2003 14:43 GMT
Comment 127Virgil06-Dec-2003 14:45 GMT
Comment 128Virgil06-Dec-2003 14:55 GMT
Back to Top