28-Mar-2024 15:07 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Files] OpenSSH v3.7.1p2 (Rev#2)ANN.lu
Posted on 23-Dec-2003 03:39 GMT by dcr852016 comments
View flat
View list
As requested I've recompiled this version for 68020+ users.
in addition I have used the latest OpenSSL version and removed ssh-rand-helper usage..this will speed up a bit the programs.

Click to Download
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Fluke Slystalker23-Dec-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 2Francois Prowse23-Dec-2003 07:18 GMT
Comment 3Fluke Slystalker23-Dec-2003 07:27 GMT
Comment 4Kolbjørn Barmen23-Dec-2003 07:58 GMT
Comment 5Piru23-Dec-2003 08:21 GMT
Comment 6Kolbjørn Barmen23-Dec-2003 09:21 GMT
Comment 7dcr852023-Dec-2003 17:25 GMT
Comment 8dcr852023-Dec-2003 17:31 GMT
Comment 9sarag23-Dec-2003 18:52 GMT
Comment 10Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user23-Dec-2003 23:53 GMT
OpenSSH v3.7.1p2 (Rev#2) : Comment 11 of 16ANN.lu
Posted by 680x0 troll on 24-Dec-2003 08:02 GMT
680x0 is Dying!

it is now official - Netcraft has confirmed: 680x0 is dying

Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered 680x0 community when
recently IDC confirmed that 680x0 accounts for less than a fraction of 1
percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft
survey which plainly states that 680x0 has lost more market share, this
news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. 680x0 is collapsing
in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last
in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict the 680x0's
future. The hand writing is on the wall: 680x0 faces a bleak future. In
fact there won't be any future at all for 680x0 because 680x0 is dying.
Things are looking very bad for 680x0. As many of us are already aware,
680x0 continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of
blood. Amiga is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of
its core developers.

How about recompiling for x86 Aros? :D
Jump...
#12 Kolbjørn Barmen
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 12Kolbjørn Barmen24-Dec-2003 16:38 GMT
Comment 13Kolbjørn Barmen24-Dec-2003 16:39 GMT
Comment 14dcr852024-Dec-2003 18:14 GMT
Comment 15anon24-Dec-2003 22:20 GMT
Comment 16Crumb // AATRegistered user24-Dec-2003 23:16 GMT
Back to Top