18-Apr-2024 06:51 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] New Digibooster Professional homepage is onlineANN.lu
Posted on 11-Jan-2004 18:08 GMT by Andreas Magerl36 comments
View flat
View list
Now is it so far. After a longer duration the new official homepage of DBPro is finally online. There you can find in future all informations, downloads, goodies ... around the Program. We would like to refer also again to the forum, where Useres can place their questions. A new demoversion of Digibooster Professional will be soon availble for AmigaOS and MorphOS.

DBPro is a so called tracker program. It´s possible to produce your own music by using samples.

http://www.digiboosterpro.de

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1hooligan/dcsRegistered user11-Jan-2004 17:26 GMT
Comment 2takemehomegrandmaRegistered user11-Jan-2004 18:06 GMT
Comment 3Repoman11-Jan-2004 19:26 GMT
Comment 4spotUP11-Jan-2004 21:21 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous11-Jan-2004 21:52 GMT
Comment 6NekoRegistered user12-Jan-2004 04:40 GMT
Comment 7hooligan/dcsRegistered user12-Jan-2004 05:20 GMT
Comment 8JoannaK12-Jan-2004 05:25 GMT
Comment 9gavin12-Jan-2004 11:14 GMT
Comment 10Robert12-Jan-2004 11:38 GMT
Comment 11Olegil12-Jan-2004 12:21 GMT
Comment 12graviel slate12-Jan-2004 12:40 GMT
Comment 13graviel slate12-Jan-2004 12:50 GMT
Comment 14Olegil12-Jan-2004 13:32 GMT
Comment 15Olegil12-Jan-2004 13:34 GMT
Comment 16spot12-Jan-2004 13:43 GMT
Comment 17breed12-Jan-2004 14:03 GMT
Comment 18graviel slate12-Jan-2004 15:01 GMT
Comment 19T1k12-Jan-2004 15:29 GMT
Comment 20Kolbjørn Barmen12-Jan-2004 16:43 GMT
Comment 21Clownface12-Jan-2004 18:28 GMT
New Digibooster Professional homepage is online : Comment 22 of 36ANN.lu
Posted by Neko on 12-Jan-2004 18:47 GMT
In reply to Comment 16 (spot):
Because DigiBooster is the best one available, the alternatives are, for
MorphOS .. uhh.. the new version Protracker. Which is even WORSE :)

I am actually quite into music production, and my Dad and brother are in
bands (I mean ones that produce albums etc..).

My brother used to love OctaMED (before Soundstudio), but he always hated the
interface. Way too complicated just to lay down some quick guitar riffs etc.
The newer one with floaty windows was better, in his opinion, but it didn't
change the actual channel layout problems.

Basically what he did was use my Aura sampler to record straight from his
guitar amp - play OctaMed stuff beside it to lay down the tracks. When he
liked what he heard, he actually sampled it and put it in the effects he wanted
via the sampler software (no need for peddles when the software will do
flanging, reverb, etc.) and then lay it into the tracks.

Repeat for bass, rhythm, and acoustic guitar.

The only thing he liked OctaMED for was the ability to do drum stuff - because
it was so ordered and contrived that it was easy to lay down a drum track that
wasn't out of time ;)

Watch the iLife movie, and you'll see Sheryl Crow do exactly the same thing.
This is why I think Apple aren't very innovative, my brother beat Sheryl to it
by about 8 years.

As it stands, he's using CuBase to do the work, now.

http://www.arbitermt.co.uk/steinberg/products/cubasesl_images/screenshot2_project.jpg

As for my Dad - well, he has a catalogue of songs going back years, and he's
also an accomplished clarinet player, so he is quite enamoured by applications
like Sebalius that do real musical notation.

http://www.sibelius.com/products/sibelius/features/look_and_feel.html

You're basically talking real musical notation for people who can read music.

GarageBand is basically for musicians who can't read music ;)

But with a couple of tweaks, couldn't you quite easily turn GarageBand's
horizontal display into simple musical notation? See.. the flexibility is
there!

If screen estate is your qualm, and you don't like the horizontal bars, realise
that on a 1280x1024 screen you could fit a something like 12 channels there
without appreciable loss of information. Shrink the channels further (do away
with GarageBand's useless waveform display.. just show note, time, instrument
picture) and you can expand further.

Given that we read horizontally, adding channels as displayed vertically means
we are restricted by how much information we can squeeze in - you still need a
horizontal "note, time, instrument" record even if it's (66 G-5 1000) which
probably restricts it to the same number on the same sized screen (we're
worrying about readability of text here)

And you lose the flexibility of different, more musical-notation-friendly
layouts. All of GarageBand, CuBase and Sebelius take advantage of solutions
and intuitiveness that ProTracker-style layouts simply do not afford.

=Neko=
Jump...
#27 Ville Sarell
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 23graviel slate12-Jan-2004 18:55 GMT
Comment 24NekoRegistered user12-Jan-2004 19:39 GMT
Comment 25Rafo12-Jan-2004 21:08 GMT
Comment 26NekoRegistered user12-Jan-2004 22:27 GMT
Comment 27Ville Sarell12-Jan-2004 23:03 GMT
Comment 28breed13-Jan-2004 07:53 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous13-Jan-2004 09:55 GMT
Comment 30Olegil13-Jan-2004 12:11 GMT
Comment 31Kolbjørn Barmen13-Jan-2004 14:13 GMT
Comment 32Leif13-Jan-2004 17:04 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous14-Jan-2004 10:21 GMT
Comment 34NekoRegistered user15-Jan-2004 07:16 GMT
Comment 35NekoRegistered user15-Jan-2004 07:26 GMT
Comment 36Leif15-Jan-2004 23:28 GMT
Back to Top