24-Apr-2024 08:09 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] TeamAROS bounty program updatedANN.lu
Posted on 23-Jan-2004 02:30 GMT by Christophe Decanini79 comments
View flat
View list
The teamAROS has set three new objectives in their bounty program:
- PCI driver, ata device and support of fat32.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe DecaniniRegistered user23-Jan-2004 01:37 GMT
Comment 2Christophe DecaniniRegistered user23-Jan-2004 01:45 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous23-Jan-2004 06:19 GMT
Comment 4Ogun23-Jan-2004 06:39 GMT
Comment 5Olegil23-Jan-2004 07:38 GMT
Comment 6Amon_ReRegistered user23-Jan-2004 08:49 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous23-Jan-2004 08:58 GMT
Comment 8Olegil23-Jan-2004 09:24 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous23-Jan-2004 09:31 GMT
Comment 10Olegil23-Jan-2004 11:31 GMT
Comment 11Matt ParsonsRegistered user23-Jan-2004 11:37 GMT
Comment 12Olegil23-Jan-2004 12:41 GMT
Comment 13Matt ParsonsRegistered user23-Jan-2004 13:04 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous23-Jan-2004 13:31 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous23-Jan-2004 14:56 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous24-Jan-2004 00:12 GMT
Comment 17anon24-Jan-2004 05:51 GMT
Comment 18anon24-Jan-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 19Hagge24-Jan-2004 07:22 GMT
Comment 20Chris H24-Jan-2004 09:35 GMT
Comment 21Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user24-Jan-2004 10:05 GMT
Comment 22anon24-Jan-2004 10:19 GMT
Comment 23ikirRegistered user24-Jan-2004 12:40 GMT
Comment 24Matt ParsonsRegistered user24-Jan-2004 14:25 GMT
Comment 25pixie24-Jan-2004 16:18 GMT
Comment 26smithy24-Jan-2004 16:25 GMT
Comment 27Hagge24-Jan-2004 16:31 GMT
Comment 28Hagge24-Jan-2004 16:32 GMT
Comment 293seas24-Jan-2004 19:30 GMT
Comment 303seas24-Jan-2004 19:51 GMT
Comment 31anon24-Jan-2004 21:40 GMT
Comment 32anon24-Jan-2004 21:52 GMT
Comment 33Ronald St-Maurice24-Jan-2004 22:43 GMT
Comment 34anon24-Jan-2004 22:59 GMT
Comment 35anon24-Jan-2004 23:03 GMT
Comment 36Darth_XRegistered user24-Jan-2004 23:35 GMT
Comment 37Darth_XRegistered user25-Jan-2004 00:08 GMT
TeamAROS bounty program updated : Comment 38 of 79ANN.lu
Posted by anon on 25-Jan-2004 00:25 GMT
In reply to Comment 27 (Hagge):
> you don't remember the old 286 pc cards for the amigans do you? ;)

Sure I do, I have one, the 80286 bridgeboard installed from the factory in my a2000hd, along with the 5 1/2 floppy. It wasn't an x86 accelerator though, it was just a 286 computer on a card.

If, at the time of the PPC accelerators, they had made an x86 accelerator, y'know, like a CSPPC 68060 with a Pentium 233 accel instead of a 604e accel, it would have been a bridge to a future. instead of the PPC developement, we would have had x86 developement and a nice gradual transition to hardware that's not ghetto.

Granted the pentium 233 itself wouldn't have been as fast as the 604e at 233, but the thing is it wouldn't have stagnated, and hardware wouldn't have that terribly low bang for the buck shortcoming it has now ($600.00 for a 604e
233 in 2004!? not on your life!)

What the Amiga needs is "Slow burn, long term, getting things done" rather than the jive talkin pie in the sky euphoric buzzword spouting nonsense helium filled feet-never-touching-the-ground permasmile crap that most people blindly swallow down while holding their nose, while the rest of the world looks on and snickers under their breath.

(Y'know the type, "Amiga! coming up on you in your sleep!!!11!!1 Amiga! First we take Manhattan, then we sweep Berlin off it's lighter-than-air feet!!!1!1!1!" after every post, etc. this is who Amiga Inc are pandering to.)

The problem with the hardware today, is it lacks any forsight, the same lack of forsight that fucked us for a decade while the world moved on, and left us scrounging aminet trying to replace 68k apps with $600-233mhz PPC apps while the rest of the world buys 1GHz cpu's for the price of a filling meal at McDonalds. The current solutions don't solve the problem, they just bumped up the class of prison we're in a bit, but we're still fucking stuck in prison.

The "planned" or "official" story is that OS5 will be hardware indipendant, but that's a crock of shit and yet more pie in the sky bullshit, and completely flies in the face of the direction of OS4. If we're going hardware indipendant, then why go proprietary PPC as a steppingstone? this steppingstone doesn't move in that direction at all. I actually purchased an Amiga developer system (the D'Amiga) when it was announced THIS was the transition system, at a time when the direction of Amiga was nothing but a ship with no sail, and changed daily as fleecy told everyone what he thought they wanted to hear, changing accordingly.

Amiga's current direction is a community cancer, where anyone that doersn't agree with the fucked direction they are taking is considered part of that cancer and cut off like a tumor, to the point where the community is policing itself and shutting out people rather than growing in number. the community has gangrene, and will die from it because of this. this cult is now officially sanctioned by Amiga, and this cult is holding the community hostage to the point where those of us not in it would rather not be associated with the term "Amigan" anymore because of these people.

Look around, hundreds of the Amiga Communities most brilliant and productive people no longer wish to be called Amigans anymore because of this! Even as they continue to create things Amigans use everyday! Gangrene, and it's killing us.

it's probably too late. Everyone in the position to do something about these problems are content with the infection.
Jump...
#39 anon #40 smithy #42 Seehund #60 Don Cox
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 39anon25-Jan-2004 00:37 GMT
Comment 40smithy25-Jan-2004 00:48 GMT
Comment 41Megol25-Jan-2004 03:03 GMT
Comment 42Seehund25-Jan-2004 03:58 GMT
Comment 43Seehund25-Jan-2004 04:01 GMT
Comment 44Seehund25-Jan-2004 04:04 GMT
Comment 45Seehund25-Jan-2004 04:06 GMT
Comment 46anon25-Jan-2004 04:55 GMT
Comment 47koan25-Jan-2004 06:23 GMT
Comment 48anon25-Jan-2004 06:55 GMT
Comment 49anon25-Jan-2004 06:57 GMT
Comment 50hammer25-Jan-2004 10:10 GMT
Comment 51hammer25-Jan-2004 10:33 GMT
Comment 52hammer25-Jan-2004 10:47 GMT
Comment 53Matt ParsonsRegistered user25-Jan-2004 12:23 GMT
Comment 54John25-Jan-2004 21:29 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous25-Jan-2004 21:48 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous25-Jan-2004 21:48 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous25-Jan-2004 21:49 GMT
Comment 58pixie26-Jan-2004 08:53 GMT
Comment 59runetrek26-Jan-2004 09:10 GMT
Comment 60Don CoxRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:06 GMT
Comment 61Don CoxRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:19 GMT
Comment 62Matt ParsonsRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:41 GMT
Comment 63Don CoxRegistered user26-Jan-2004 11:50 GMT
Comment 64Alan26-Jan-2004 13:54 GMT
Comment 65Anonymous26-Jan-2004 19:21 GMT
Comment 66anon26-Jan-2004 20:09 GMT
Comment 67anon26-Jan-2004 20:11 GMT
Comment 68Seehund26-Jan-2004 20:53 GMT
Comment 69Matt ParsonsRegistered user26-Jan-2004 22:15 GMT
Comment 70anon26-Jan-2004 22:22 GMT
Comment 71EyeAm27-Jan-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 72EyeAm27-Jan-2004 06:25 GMT
Comment 73anon27-Jan-2004 06:56 GMT
Comment 74Seehund27-Jan-2004 07:44 GMT
Comment 75Olegil27-Jan-2004 11:27 GMT
Comment 76Ogun27-Jan-2004 12:14 GMT
Comment 77Seehund27-Jan-2004 16:52 GMT
Comment 78EyeAm27-Jan-2004 19:17 GMT
Comment 79EyeAm27-Jan-2004 19:40 GMT
Back to Top