20-Apr-2024 14:23 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Pegasos sales restartingANN.lu
Posted on 28-Jan-2004 20:14 GMT by Nate Downes156 comments
View flat
View list
That's right, online sales are returning early! If you're looking for that PegasosII, the wait is over! PegasosPPC.com is back and ready to take your order.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Abuse28-Jan-2004 19:31 GMT
Comment 2Darth_XRegistered user28-Jan-2004 19:33 GMT
Comment 3Ronald St-Maurice28-Jan-2004 19:35 GMT
Comment 44pLaYeR28-Jan-2004 19:38 GMT
Comment 5Emeric SH28-Jan-2004 19:40 GMT
Comment 6Abuse28-Jan-2004 19:41 GMT
Comment 7DET Nicolas28-Jan-2004 19:58 GMT
Comment 8DET Nicolas28-Jan-2004 19:58 GMT
Comment 9Christophe DecaniniRegistered user28-Jan-2004 20:03 GMT
Comment 10Nate DownesRegistered user28-Jan-2004 20:10 GMT
Comment 11Ronald St-Maurice28-Jan-2004 20:11 GMT
Comment 12itix28-Jan-2004 20:18 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous28-Jan-2004 20:22 GMT
Comment 14Ronald St-Maurice28-Jan-2004 20:30 GMT
Comment 15Nate DownesRegistered user28-Jan-2004 20:37 GMT
Comment 16Christophe DecaniniRegistered user28-Jan-2004 20:55 GMT
Comment 17Christophe DecaniniRegistered user28-Jan-2004 20:58 GMT
Comment 18Ronald St-Maurice28-Jan-2004 21:16 GMT
Comment 19Nate DownesRegistered user28-Jan-2004 21:21 GMT
Comment 20Francois Prowse28-Jan-2004 21:25 GMT
Comment 21Abuse28-Jan-2004 21:26 GMT
Comment 22Abuse28-Jan-2004 21:30 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous28-Jan-2004 21:39 GMT
Comment 24Abuse28-Jan-2004 21:39 GMT
Comment 25Nate DownesRegistered user28-Jan-2004 21:44 GMT
Comment 26Darth_XRegistered user28-Jan-2004 21:49 GMT
Comment 27Ronald St-Maurice28-Jan-2004 21:50 GMT
Comment 28Abuse28-Jan-2004 21:51 GMT
Comment 29Abuse28-Jan-2004 21:51 GMT
Comment 30Abuse28-Jan-2004 21:56 GMT
Comment 31Stefan Blixth28-Jan-2004 21:58 GMT
Comment 32Abuse28-Jan-2004 21:59 GMT
Comment 33Stefan Blixth28-Jan-2004 22:05 GMT
Comment 34Abuse28-Jan-2004 22:05 GMT
Comment 35itix28-Jan-2004 22:06 GMT
Comment 36Abuse28-Jan-2004 22:09 GMT
Comment 37lempkee28-Jan-2004 22:17 GMT
Comment 38lempkee28-Jan-2004 22:18 GMT
Comment 39Christophe DecaniniRegistered user28-Jan-2004 22:19 GMT
Comment 40Christophe DecaniniRegistered user28-Jan-2004 22:21 GMT
Comment 41Christophe DecaniniRegistered user28-Jan-2004 22:22 GMT
Comment 42Ronald St-Maurice28-Jan-2004 22:32 GMT
Comment 43Johnathan28-Jan-2004 22:34 GMT
Comment 44Johnathan28-Jan-2004 22:35 GMT
Comment 45Ronald St-Maurice28-Jan-2004 22:36 GMT
Comment 46Christophe DecaniniRegistered user28-Jan-2004 22:47 GMT
Comment 47lempkee28-Jan-2004 23:08 GMT
Comment 48lempkee28-Jan-2004 23:37 GMT
Comment 49Kolbjørn Barmen29-Jan-2004 03:27 GMT
Comment 50hammer29-Jan-2004 04:43 GMT
Comment 51Don CoxRegistered user29-Jan-2004 08:12 GMT
Comment 52Don CoxRegistered user29-Jan-2004 08:21 GMT
Comment 53Anonymous29-Jan-2004 08:43 GMT
Comment 54takemehomegrandmaRegistered user29-Jan-2004 09:08 GMT
Comment 55Ronald St-Maurice29-Jan-2004 09:21 GMT
Comment 56takemehomegrandmaRegistered user29-Jan-2004 09:22 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous29-Jan-2004 09:43 GMT
Comment 58Don CoxRegistered user29-Jan-2004 10:23 GMT
Comment 59Don CoxRegistered user29-Jan-2004 10:28 GMT
Comment 60lempkee29-Jan-2004 10:44 GMT
Comment 61takemehomegrandmaRegistered user29-Jan-2004 11:00 GMT
Comment 62takemehomegrandmaRegistered user29-Jan-2004 11:03 GMT
Comment 63Anonymous29-Jan-2004 11:56 GMT
Comment 64Anonymous29-Jan-2004 11:58 GMT
Comment 65Big Red Troll29-Jan-2004 12:32 GMT
Comment 66lempkee29-Jan-2004 12:42 GMT
Comment 67Don CoxRegistered user29-Jan-2004 13:13 GMT
Comment 68vortexau29-Jan-2004 13:16 GMT
Comment 69vortexau29-Jan-2004 13:19 GMT
Comment 70Christophe DecaniniRegistered user29-Jan-2004 13:37 GMT
Comment 71samface29-Jan-2004 13:52 GMT
Comment 72Matt ParsonsRegistered user29-Jan-2004 13:57 GMT
Comment 73samface29-Jan-2004 14:04 GMT
Comment 74Matt ParsonsRegistered user29-Jan-2004 14:15 GMT
Comment 75samface29-Jan-2004 14:54 GMT
Comment 76Don CoxRegistered user29-Jan-2004 14:58 GMT
Comment 77ehaines29-Jan-2004 16:08 GMT
Comment 78Matt ParsonsRegistered user29-Jan-2004 16:14 GMT
Comment 79samface29-Jan-2004 16:23 GMT
Comment 80The_Editor29-Jan-2004 17:42 GMT
Comment 81Anonymous29-Jan-2004 18:05 GMT
Pegasos sales restarting : Comment 82 of 156ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 29-Jan-2004 18:15 GMT
In reply to Comment 67 (Don Cox):
@ Don Cox

>> "Most people can do everything they want with their "last year's model" and
>> that is because "the last year's model" is actually quite good and very
>> suitable for their needs!"

> If you position the Pegasos/A1 as "good enough" mediocre computers

OK, the terms "last year's model", "good enough" and "mediocre" all has an unjust negative touch. You compare it to the *top of the line* PC's and Mac's, like that is relevant. It's not, because your reasoning is assuming that there only is one single segment - only *one single need* - on the entire computer market, and that everyone is prepared to walk across broken glass in order to get the stuff with the highest numbers on. That is not true. Again, take a look at the PC market that totally stalled some year ago. Everyone was thinking that the race would go on and on forever, people will continue to demand faster and faster CPU's and higher "numbers" forever, like USB3, Firewire1600, etc. That assumption kicked back big time upon the industry, because people didn't replace/upgrade their computer as expected!

Why? Well, why would people invest good money to upgrade to a "today's model" when they already have *everything they need* in the "yesterday's model"? Again, those terms are inappropriate. Perhaps the term "most suitable" would be better? Is the latest and most powerful Nvidia 3D gaming card the most suitable card for someone who mainly uses their computer for word processing, just because it's available? Is 24-bit audio with midi connectors really suitable for someone who mainly uses their computer for bank transactions on their Internet bank, just because it's available? Is a roaring 4GHz CPU really suitable for someone who uses his computer mainly for trading recepies on an e-mail list, just because it's available?

Perhaps your time in the x86 "space race" has caused you to believe that constant racing simply must be a normal state? Perhaps it isn't, not to everyone at least? Different needs, different segments, different products - "suitable" products.

> People

Again, who is "people" here? What segment are we talking about? Render farm owners? Programmers and 3D developers that needs every clock cycle they can find? Or Mr/Mrs Smith who's only need is to write a mail and browse the web once in a while, and greatly apreciates if the "device" they are using to do that is totally noiseless and starts up in a flash?

> will only buy a weird, non-standard computer (such as a Mac) if it has some
> outstanding features and is of really high quality.

Computers may come in lots of different shapes, and have lots of different purposes. AFAIK, neither the areas of usage, nor the price or "shapes" for the Pegasos is cut in stone.

IMO, the Pegasos offering *as of available today* could be seen as:

1) The best priced open PPC development desktop system. Many OS options. This should interest any non-Mac PPC developers.

2) A very reasonable priced component of *silent* "build it yourself" home server system, with low power consumption but still quite powerful thanks to its PPC processor and gigabit ethernet that goes directly into a very fast North Bridge (that's originally designed for high speed communication purposes) instead of going through the narrow PCI bus.

3) The guardian, a professional security solution consisting of both hardware, software and services, and very competitive priced as such.

And of course:
4) The best priced and most powerful Amiga NG solution that is still being developed (not an old OS under emulation)

Are there more that I forgot?

It could also (in it's current incarnation) become:

1) A general alternative desktop solution, both for home and for office. That would (IMO) require a lower price, which certainly could be achieved through volume and innovative business models (in the console market they sell the HW at loss and make the money on licenses instead. Only the imagination is the limit).

2) One of the highest-end (and most expensive?) STB's around.

3) An OEM component for any kind of device in any kind of shape that requires power without watts, performance without noise. Price? I would guess that is negotiable and depends on volume.

"Pegasos technology" (PPC hardware components, BIOS, OS's, applications, etc) may in the future be derived into (and all current SW developers will benefit):

1) Low cost custom built STB's. There were some interesting reading in the interview with b-plan in the amiga.org magazine issue #0.

2) The "Eclipsis" (the same interview), a 150x200 mm system, highly integrated with exciting technology (like WLAN), for use as a "display unit" (it's supposed to have a 16:9 aspect ratio screen, perfect for DVD's etc), as a web tablet, in laptop usage, or whatever. Seems to be a very suitable OEM component for lots of possible projects.

3) The Pegasos III, a high end PPC 970 (G5) computer, with a fast Marvell Northbridge that uses IBM's high speed Elastic Interface Technology. It will probably cost plenty, but be cheaper than high end Macs.

This last product is perhaps what you are looking for, Don Cox? But as I said, there are needs on certain market segments that one can make money from, other than those who allways wants desktop products with the "highest numbers" possible. Nothing is cut in stone, lots of products and areas of usage can be found, but you have to use some imagination.
Jump...
#87 hammer #89 hammer #99 Don Cox
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 83hooligan/dcsRegistered user29-Jan-2004 19:45 GMT
Comment 84takemehomegrandmaRegistered user29-Jan-2004 21:09 GMT
Comment 85takemehomegrandmaRegistered user29-Jan-2004 21:13 GMT
Comment 86Anonymous29-Jan-2004 23:26 GMT
Comment 87hammer30-Jan-2004 01:17 GMT
Comment 88hammer30-Jan-2004 01:25 GMT
Comment 89hammer30-Jan-2004 01:39 GMT
Comment 90hammer30-Jan-2004 01:59 GMT
Comment 91hammer30-Jan-2004 02:39 GMT
Comment 92takemehomegrandmaRegistered user30-Jan-2004 08:00 GMT
Comment 93takemehomegrandmaRegistered user30-Jan-2004 08:06 GMT
Comment 94takemehomegrandmaRegistered user30-Jan-2004 08:18 GMT
Comment 95Grzegorz Kraszewski30-Jan-2004 08:19 GMT
Comment 96Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user30-Jan-2004 10:51 GMT
Comment 97Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user30-Jan-2004 10:54 GMT
Comment 98Anonymous30-Jan-2004 13:50 GMT
Comment 99Don CoxRegistered user30-Jan-2004 14:09 GMT
Comment 100Anonymous30-Jan-2004 14:10 GMT
Comment 101Don CoxRegistered user30-Jan-2004 14:15 GMT
Comment 102Anonymous30-Jan-2004 16:58 GMT
Comment 103Anonymous30-Jan-2004 17:04 GMT
Comment 104Lando31-Jan-2004 06:08 GMT
Comment 105Lando31-Jan-2004 06:40 GMT
Comment 106samface31-Jan-2004 08:18 GMT
Comment 107samface31-Jan-2004 08:34 GMT
Comment 108Anonymous31-Jan-2004 09:46 GMT
Comment 109Lando31-Jan-2004 09:58 GMT
Comment 110samface31-Jan-2004 11:12 GMT
Comment 111Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 11:12 GMT
Comment 112samface31-Jan-2004 11:19 GMT
Comment 113Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 11:28 GMT
Comment 114Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 11:31 GMT
Comment 115samface31-Jan-2004 11:31 GMT
Comment 116Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 11:35 GMT
Comment 117samface31-Jan-2004 11:38 GMT
Comment 118samface31-Jan-2004 12:02 GMT
Comment 119Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 12:07 GMT
Comment 120Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 12:11 GMT
Comment 121hooligan/dcsRegistered user31-Jan-2004 12:32 GMT
Comment 122samface31-Jan-2004 12:53 GMT
Comment 123samface31-Jan-2004 13:06 GMT
Comment 124Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 13:29 GMT
Comment 125samface31-Jan-2004 14:07 GMT
Comment 126samface31-Jan-2004 14:17 GMT
Comment 127Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 15:00 GMT
Comment 128Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user31-Jan-2004 15:02 GMT
Comment 129hooligan/dcsRegistered user31-Jan-2004 15:35 GMT
Comment 130samface01-Feb-2004 11:07 GMT
Comment 131samface01-Feb-2004 11:43 GMT
Comment 132samface01-Feb-2004 12:47 GMT
Comment 133Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user01-Feb-2004 15:31 GMT
Comment 134samface01-Feb-2004 16:25 GMT
Comment 135Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user01-Feb-2004 18:10 GMT
Comment 136Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user01-Feb-2004 18:11 GMT
Comment 137Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user01-Feb-2004 18:15 GMT
Comment 138samface01-Feb-2004 18:26 GMT
Comment 139Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user01-Feb-2004 19:41 GMT
Comment 140Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user01-Feb-2004 19:46 GMT
Comment 141samface02-Feb-2004 07:18 GMT
Comment 142samface02-Feb-2004 08:02 GMT
Comment 143a user02-Feb-2004 10:16 GMT
Comment 144samface02-Feb-2004 11:44 GMT
Comment 145samface02-Feb-2004 11:56 GMT
Comment 146Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user02-Feb-2004 12:17 GMT
Comment 147samface02-Feb-2004 12:39 GMT
Comment 148Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user02-Feb-2004 13:05 GMT
Comment 149Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user02-Feb-2004 13:07 GMT
Comment 150samface02-Feb-2004 13:41 GMT
Comment 151Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user02-Feb-2004 14:37 GMT
Comment 152samface02-Feb-2004 16:51 GMT
Comment 153Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user02-Feb-2004 19:58 GMT
Comment 154samface02-Feb-2004 20:23 GMT
Comment 155Anonymous06-Feb-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 156Anonymous13-Feb-2004 04:56 GMT
Back to Top