25-Apr-2024 06:26 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Files] VIM 6.2 ported to MorphOSANN.lu
Posted on 07-Feb-2004 20:51 GMT by oGALAXYo23 comments
View flat
View list
VIM 6.2 ported to MorphOS While playing with the MorphOS SDK today I quickly hacked some stuff together to get VIM 6.2 ported to MorphOS (native PowerPC code). I didn't had time making some binaries (maybe tomorrow).

So how does it work:

a) get the Amiga sources of VIM 6.2.0 from ftp.vim.org Runtime and Source.

b) get the MorphOS Diff that I hacked together from my page MorphOS Diff.

c) untar both Tarballs and patch my MorphOS Diff ontop of it.

optional:

d) get the subversion patches for VIM (currently 6.2.242) and patch them ontop of the VIM source (after my MorphOS Diffs got applied) one by one. You can automate this process of getting all patches at once with my GetVIM Script which you can find on my page GetVIM. It will download all the patches and create one big patch file out of them. After this has been done patch the big file ontop of the VIM source (ignore warnings and errors they are unimportant and usually related to missing files for Windows/BeOS/Linux).

e) compile VIM by entering 'make' in the vim/vim62/src Dir and enjoy the show.

To run VIM you need to do these things:

assign vim: ""
assign home: ""

And if it complains more assign it as well to "". VIM Amiga version wasn't maintained for quite some time due the broken machine of Bram Moolenar (the father of VIM who started it initially on Amiga). Maybe when I find more time I gonna fix all the stuff and even do a gVIM MorphOS version - dunno yet. It wasn't that special either but I do belive there are many people who use VIM on Linux and want to use the same powerful Editor on MorphOS.

oGALAXYo

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christophe DecaniniRegistered user07-Feb-2004 20:22 GMT
Comment 2amigaboy07-Feb-2004 20:34 GMT
Comment 3Leo07-Feb-2004 20:38 GMT
Comment 4oGALAXYo07-Feb-2004 20:51 GMT
Comment 5hnl_dkRegistered user07-Feb-2004 21:10 GMT
Comment 6Anon07-Feb-2004 21:22 GMT
Comment 7Kolbjørn Barmen07-Feb-2004 21:23 GMT
Comment 8koan07-Feb-2004 23:16 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous08-Feb-2004 00:11 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous08-Feb-2004 00:32 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous08-Feb-2004 00:42 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous08-Feb-2004 00:59 GMT
Comment 13Kjetil08-Feb-2004 01:52 GMT
Comment 14Trizt08-Feb-2004 08:44 GMT
Comment 15oGALAXYo08-Feb-2004 09:24 GMT
Comment 16koan08-Feb-2004 11:33 GMT
Comment 17Leo08-Feb-2004 12:31 GMT
Comment 18Kjetil08-Feb-2004 12:47 GMT
Comment 19Sigbjørn Skjæret08-Feb-2004 13:25 GMT
Comment 20oGALAXYo08-Feb-2004 14:04 GMT
Comment 21Kolbjørn Barmen08-Feb-2004 18:32 GMT
Comment 22Sigbjørn Skjæret09-Feb-2004 08:37 GMT
Comment 23oGALAXYo09-Feb-2004 20:38 GMT
Back to Top