20-Apr-2024 05:07 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] First impressions of the Amiga OS 4.0bANN.lu
Posted on 10-Feb-2004 06:48 GMT by Raffaele (Edited on 2004-02-10 14:22:00 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä)86 comments
View flat
View list
Here you can find a brief report [from the Amiga North Thames meeting]. Unfortunately the report gives only a few informations. [Here's another report from the NCSCAUG meeting.] I forwarded these news from amiganews.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Red MelonsRegistered user10-Feb-2004 06:59 GMT
Comment 2Raffaele10-Feb-2004 07:21 GMT
Comment 3Raffaele10-Feb-2004 12:39 GMT
Comment 4DoomMaster10-Feb-2004 20:58 GMT
Comment 5Lando10-Feb-2004 22:11 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous10-Feb-2004 22:30 GMT
Comment 7Eva10-Feb-2004 22:30 GMT
Comment 8Nate DownesRegistered user10-Feb-2004 22:57 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous10-Feb-2004 23:00 GMT
Comment 10MarkTime11-Feb-2004 02:39 GMT
Comment 11Raffaele11-Feb-2004 03:01 GMT
Comment 12JKD11-Feb-2004 04:32 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous11-Feb-2004 05:12 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous11-Feb-2004 05:13 GMT
Comment 15Ole-Egil11-Feb-2004 06:18 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous11-Feb-2004 07:38 GMT
Comment 17Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user11-Feb-2004 08:29 GMT
Comment 18Abuse11-Feb-2004 09:23 GMT
Comment 19Ben11-Feb-2004 09:42 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous11-Feb-2004 09:45 GMT
Comment 21Ben11-Feb-2004 09:47 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous11-Feb-2004 09:56 GMT
Comment 23Steffen Haeuser11-Feb-2004 09:57 GMT
Comment 24Kjetil11-Feb-2004 10:07 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous11-Feb-2004 10:26 GMT
Comment 26Olaf Barthel11-Feb-2004 10:29 GMT
Comment 27Kjetil11-Feb-2004 10:33 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous11-Feb-2004 10:37 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil11-Feb-2004 10:41 GMT
Comment 30Frank11-Feb-2004 10:42 GMT
Comment 31Kjetil11-Feb-2004 10:42 GMT
Comment 32Richi11-Feb-2004 10:46 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous11-Feb-2004 10:53 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous11-Feb-2004 11:49 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous11-Feb-2004 12:17 GMT
Comment 36Ole-Egil11-Feb-2004 12:29 GMT
Comment 37Emeric SH11-Feb-2004 12:36 GMT
Comment 38Olaf Barthel11-Feb-2004 12:37 GMT
Comment 39vortexau11-Feb-2004 12:45 GMT
Comment 40Pete11-Feb-2004 13:00 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous11-Feb-2004 13:46 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous11-Feb-2004 13:48 GMT
Comment 43Don CoxRegistered user11-Feb-2004 13:56 GMT
Comment 44Nate DownesRegistered user11-Feb-2004 14:02 GMT
Comment 45hooligan/dcsRegistered user11-Feb-2004 14:03 GMT
Comment 46Nate DownesRegistered user11-Feb-2004 14:04 GMT
Comment 47Don CoxRegistered user11-Feb-2004 14:07 GMT
Comment 48Nate DownesRegistered user11-Feb-2004 14:14 GMT
Comment 49Don CoxRegistered user11-Feb-2004 14:15 GMT
Comment 50Tatu11-Feb-2004 14:47 GMT
Comment 51Olaf Barthel11-Feb-2004 15:23 GMT
Comment 52Olaf Barthel11-Feb-2004 15:32 GMT
Comment 53Anonymous11-Feb-2004 15:35 GMT
Comment 54Sigbjørn Skjæret11-Feb-2004 15:35 GMT
Comment 55Olaf Barthel11-Feb-2004 16:10 GMT
Comment 56Don CoxRegistered user11-Feb-2004 16:21 GMT
Comment 57Olaf Barthel11-Feb-2004 16:29 GMT
Comment 58Kjetil11-Feb-2004 17:11 GMT
Comment 59Ben11-Feb-2004 18:15 GMT
Comment 60Sigbjørn Skjæret11-Feb-2004 18:44 GMT
Comment 61Bill Borsari11-Feb-2004 20:41 GMT
Comment 62Kjetil11-Feb-2004 21:45 GMT
Comment 63Nicolas Sallin11-Feb-2004 22:51 GMT
Comment 64Kjetil12-Feb-2004 07:01 GMT
Comment 65Kjetil12-Feb-2004 07:38 GMT
Comment 66Sigbjørn Skjæret12-Feb-2004 10:46 GMT
Comment 67DET Nicolas12-Feb-2004 11:18 GMT
Comment 68Sigbjørn Skjæret12-Feb-2004 11:23 GMT
Comment 69itix12-Feb-2004 11:41 GMT
Comment 70Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user12-Feb-2004 13:02 GMT
Comment 71Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user12-Feb-2004 13:03 GMT
Comment 72Olaf Barthel12-Feb-2004 13:56 GMT
Comment 73Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user12-Feb-2004 14:42 GMT
Comment 74Olaf Barthel12-Feb-2004 17:40 GMT
Comment 75Nicolas Sallin12-Feb-2004 20:24 GMT
Comment 76Kjetil12-Feb-2004 21:55 GMT
Comment 77Kjetil12-Feb-2004 22:03 GMT
Comment 78Nicolas Sallin13-Feb-2004 00:33 GMT
Comment 79Olaf Barthel13-Feb-2004 06:58 GMT
First impressions of the Amiga OS 4.0b : Comment 80 of 86ANN.lu
Posted by Chris H on 13-Feb-2004 11:18 GMT
Any chance of us getting back on topic? You know - what the original news
article was about? Guess not :) so you'll have to ignore my on-topic comments!

It's quite funny reading all the FUD on OS4 spread by MorphOS supporters, as if
MOS is actually fully finished & stable right now (although I admit it may well
be by the time OS4 is out).


There are actually only a few semi-major components to replace in OS4 now, and
none of these are actually required since they will just provide (big) speed-ups
not any new functionality. Specifically:

1. No UDMA drivers for IDE, just slow PIO mode.
2. P96 still being a 68k kludge.
3. No SNAP gfx drivers, just some pre-existing drivers.
4. The Petunia JIT still not properly integrated.

AFAICS from the OS4 Beta demo, pretty much everything else was there. And there
was some good news in the Club Amiga Mag the day after I saw the OS4 demo:

1. Apparently the UDMA code exists but is not properly tested yet.
3. SNAP now exists for LinuxPPC & GCC so porting it to OS4 is likely already underway.

Also, we already know Petunia exists, it is just integration into OS4 - not
rocket science.

So the only thing requiring lots of new coding (rather than just some porting or
other fiddling) is rewriting P96 for PPC. I don't know how big a challenge that
is, or how far they have got in rewriting it, but it seems to me this is what
will hold-up OS4 if anything will. Because of that I imagine they are putting
most of their resources into P96.


Given the pretty fast progress between the Alpha & Beta demos, I think it is
reasonable to guess OS4 can fairly comfortably be out by June (i.e. 3 months
more development time plus 1 month to manufacture & distribute it). Of course,
this is a guess, but it seems a reasonable guess based on recent progress.

My original worst-case guess was end of March, so thats not too much slippage.

And yes, OS4 Beta was running pretty damn fast, despite using 68K P96 & PIO IDE.
When it's properly finished, it's going to be BLAZINGLY fast :-)

Compatibility? Way better than the Alpha. They certainly still have some
problems, but fixing compatibility is pretty easy once you have a debugged
system with an architecture very similar to the old system.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 81Nicolas Sallin13-Feb-2004 14:32 GMT
Comment 82Kjetil13-Feb-2004 15:22 GMT
Comment 83Olaf Barthel13-Feb-2004 15:41 GMT
Comment 84darklite13-Feb-2004 17:30 GMT
Comment 85Anonymous13-Feb-2004 18:10 GMT
Comment 86Kjetil14-Feb-2004 07:56 GMT
Back to Top