[Web] How many unpaid Genesi employees? | ANN.lu |
Posted on 27-Feb-2004 08:29 GMT by Christian Kemp | 214 comments View flat View list |
In a thread titled "How many unpaid Genesi employees?" on Moo Bunny, Johan Rönnblom posted his story.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
How many unpaid Genesi employees? : Comment 179 of 214 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Lost souls on 01-Mar-2004 18:47 GMT | In reply to Comment 166 (Johan Rönnblom): "> Sure, all we got is alot of former Thendic employees that are not getting
> what they are owed, including yourself.
I've never been a Thendic employee. What "lot" of employees are you
referring to really?"
So you contracted for work with Genesi then?
>> b) There would be anything fishy about their association with Thendic when it
>> comes to IP.
>> (In fact, if Thendic's liquidator want to make Thendic able to pay their
>> debts, Thendic definitely NEEDS associates who are interested in Thendic's
>> IP.)
> "Thendic-France is STILL part of Pretory. This does not effect Genesi.
> Pretory and Genesi have absolutely nothing to do with each other
> corporately with the exception of common shareholders: Raquel and I."
>
> But that was surely not what they told the judge in the Thendic-Amiga case, as can be seen here:
In what way does these quotes show that there would be anything fishy about
Genesi trying to aquire IP from Thendic?
Now let me make a little organizational sketch here to explain things:
Pretory <--> Thendic <--> Genesi
As BBRV claimed, Thendic was part of Pretory, in the capacity of being
owned by Pretory. As the court document claim, Thendic is/was part of
Genesi, in the capacity of being one part in a merger to form Genesi. The
link between Pretory and Genesi only goes through Thendic (or through BBRV,
for that matter). That's exactly what BBRV says.
No matter whether you understand this or not, you're still just trying to
shift focus. Why would there be anything wrong about Genesi aquiring IP
from Thendic, as long as they follow the proper procedures for doing so?
You forgot one very, very important fact. Pretory USA legaly owns Pretory SA.
Pretory USA (Pretory) <--> Thendic <--> Genesi (BBRV & partners)
see anything wrong with this picture?
Now I'll really light the flames!
I can't see how the publicly own assets of Thendic (peg/MOS) etc. Gets into the private hands of Genesi (BBRV & partners)
Stockholders of Pretory USA could very well file a class action lawsuit against Genesi/BBRV to return the assets taken from thendic Thendic (peg/MOS) etc.
IMHO Thendic owns Peg/MOS and all IP etc., not BBRV! |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|