[Web] How many unpaid Genesi employees? | ANN.lu |
Posted on 27-Feb-2004 08:29 GMT by Christian Kemp | 214 comments View flat View list |
In a thread titled "How many unpaid Genesi employees?" on Moo Bunny, Johan Rönnblom posted his story.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
How many unpaid Genesi employees? : Comment 198 of 214 | ANN.lu |
Posted by samface on 02-Mar-2004 17:31 GMT | In reply to Comment 195 (Johan Rönnblom): >Several people confirmed that they, too, got the same card at the
>trade show in question.
Again, prove it.
>The notion that BBRV would make a fake card in order to.. err.. in
>order to make a fool out of himself when AInc denied the story (which
>they never did, of course), doesn't seem to be very.. plausible.
Amiga Inc. denied everything about the story about a new CEO and that both Fleecy Moss and Bill McEwen would be "out of the picture" (as BBRV put it). The business card scan is something BBRV needs to explain, not Amiga Inc. Amiga Inc. cannot explain the business card even if they wanted to since Amiga Inc. has nothing to do with it.
Furthermore, even if Garry would have been passing out those business cards, it's still very unprofessional of BBRV to make these claims in public without verifying such information first. No matter how we look at it, BBRV was obviously and indisputably wrong and I find it very unlikely that BBRV would have been completely unaware of the truth.
>Why wouldn't someone be able to register whatever ad they wanted at
>Google?
We're talking about marketing products and their trademarks, of course there are limitations to what you can do when it comes to trademarks that you do not have the rights for.
>Certainly we've seen a lot of mischief. And obviously you
>missed something here - the ad related to various people's names
>*were* in fact promptly removed. Chances are pretty good that Genesi
>were involved in this removal, don't you think?
Not Genesi, but hopefully atleast Thendic-France. However, what I'm questioning here is not about how long they continued these activities, it's about why the did it in the first place, ie the intent.
>As for proving Ben H's nasty letters, nope, I won't do that today. I
>would if my objective was to smear Hyperion, but it's not.
Regardless of your intent, your claim was smearing Hyperion. Avoiding to smear Hyperion was obviously not a priority.
>You don't have to believe me. I merely used this as an example to show that
>I'm consistent in my opinions.
Consistent in the sense that every claim that would put Genesi in a bad light would have to be backed up with proof, but Amiga Inc. & Co is someone you can unsubstantially smear in public? |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|