[News] Thendic-Amiga Court Case - Latest Motions | ANN.lu |
Posted on 04-Mar-2004 00:05 GMT by Rich Woods | 216 comments View flat View list |
Thendic-Amiga Court Case - Latest Motions
DECLARATION of Bill Buck filed by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components re 49 MOTION to modify order (RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
MOTION by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components to modify the order granting specific performance. Noting Date 3/19/2004. (Attachments: # 1 note for motion# 2 Proposed Order)(RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
DECLARATION of Bill Buck filed by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components re 49
MOTION to modify order (RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
MOTION by Plaintiff Thendic Electronics Components to modify the order granting specific performance. Noting Date 3/19/2004. (Attachments: # 1
note for motion
#2 Proposed Order (RS, ) (Entered: 03/03/2004)
Main Documnet
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Thendic-Amiga Court Case - Latest Motions : Comment 208 of 216 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Rich Woods on 07-Mar-2004 14:37 GMT | In reply to Comment 169 (gary_c): Are you or anyone else who has commented about this situation a lawyer? I don't think so. Everyone is just giving a layman's opinion, which is fun but basically pointless. Anyway, to continue in worthless conversation mode, what I've heard, from a guy who isn't a lawyer but has one to talk to for free on a
---
daily basis, is that the Amiga, Inc. - Thendic/Genesi agreement predates the AI - Hyperion one, thus rendering the latter invalid wherever it conflicts with the former. Further, it would be up to Hyperion to sue *Amiga, Inc.* to reclaim ---
anything they feel is due them (not Genesi), because it was Amiga, Inc. that made an agreement that they didn't have a right to make at the time, given the preceeding agreement with Thendic/Genesi.
I don't know if this is the correct interpretation or not, as I'm not only not a lawyer, but also completely willing to confess that my opinion on law is as worthless as everyone else's here.
The only thing we can do is wait and see how things are settled by the judge. In the meantime, yours and my and other opinions about what any of these companies can and can't do in the legal arena are just wasted bandwidth in my opinion.
---------------
You are correct - most of this is basic contract law 101 and 102.
An informed knowledgable opinion is NOT necessarily worthless or of no value - then there is sammyface's "legal arguments" which is basically worthless. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|