23-Apr-2024 18:37 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] IOSPIRIT freezes its own AMIGA-developmentsANN.lu
Posted on 08-Mar-2004 11:53 GMT by Felix Schwarz69 comments
View flat
View list
Felix Schwarz, with immediate effect, freezes the development of fxPAINT, fxSCAN, VHI Studio and the IOUSB- and VHI-drivers. Medusa and IBrowse are external developments and thus are not affected.

All products will stay in distribution. Whether the development will be reactivated at a later point in time mainly depends on the further economical and social development of the market and the profits made with it. The AMIGA-pages can be found at http://amiga.iospirit.de/ in the future. Although www.iospirit.de currently still redirects to this page, we nonetheless would be glad if existing hyperlinks in AMIGA-context would be adapted accordingly.

Subsequently, you'll find an open letter from Felix Schwarz to the AMIGA-community in all its occurences.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1hooligan/dcsRegistered user08-Mar-2004 11:08 GMT
Comment 2takemehomegrandmaRegistered user08-Mar-2004 11:11 GMT
Comment 3Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 11:22 GMT
Comment 4Elwood08-Mar-2004 12:03 GMT
Comment 5Roj08-Mar-2004 12:22 GMT
Comment 6Christophe DecaniniRegistered user08-Mar-2004 12:45 GMT
Comment 7OneVision08-Mar-2004 12:48 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous08-Mar-2004 13:07 GMT
Comment 9spot08-Mar-2004 13:24 GMT
Comment 10takemehomegrandmaRegistered user08-Mar-2004 13:40 GMT
Comment 11mahenRegistered user08-Mar-2004 13:58 GMT
Comment 12MIKE08-Mar-2004 14:06 GMT
Comment 13ilwrath08-Mar-2004 14:17 GMT
Comment 14Elwood08-Mar-2004 15:38 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:38 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:45 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:48 GMT
Comment 18hooligan/dcsRegistered user08-Mar-2004 15:50 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:54 GMT
Comment 20ilwrath08-Mar-2004 16:06 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:09 GMT
Comment 22hooligan/dcsRegistered user08-Mar-2004 16:19 GMT
Comment 23Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 16:20 GMT
Comment 24Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 16:24 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:30 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:37 GMT
Comment 27MIKE08-Mar-2004 16:41 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:43 GMT
Comment 29ilwrath08-Mar-2004 16:57 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous08-Mar-2004 17:14 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous08-Mar-2004 17:19 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous08-Mar-2004 17:49 GMT
Comment 33Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 17:49 GMT
Comment 34MarkTime08-Mar-2004 18:15 GMT
IOSPIRIT freezes its own AMIGA-developments : Comment 35 of 69ANN.lu
Posted by ilwrath on 08-Mar-2004 18:34 GMT
In reply to Comment 31 (Anonymous):
> you-can-do-anything-you-want-but-you-cant-do? I miss the logic in that.

What? The logic is that you can do anything you like, so long as you don't drive it on public roads. This is for public safety, and has nothing to do with your argument, which is baseless and incorrect.

> I don't want to sound like a broken record but it is before the law.

No, it isn't.*

(once again, in the US, we are bound to the EULA license. The keyword license. Don't believe me? Try to sell used original software on eBay, vs. trying to sell a used original book.)

> I understand the desire to negate that (it lessens the guilt when starting
> kaazaa?) but that won't get you around simple facts.

FYI, I've never run kazaa, edonkey or any of that other spy/share crap. I have downloaded some bits from other shady sources in the past... But that's not part of your argument, and has nothing to do with the "simple facts" in this discussion. Nice straw-man.

To finish off this tangent, most of my current software I did obtain for free. But not because of piracy, but because it was given to me by the (L)GPL and other public-friendly licenses. Oddly enough, these often provide me MORE VALUE, at less cost, as the license also includes rights to touch the source code!

> You might be confusing the terms "products" and "physical goods"?

Actually, by "product" I was implying "physical product." You are correct. I should have specified this better. So, I argue that software is not a physical product or physical good. You have not yet countered this argument with anything that makes any sense, Anonymous.
Jump...
#36 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 36Anonymous08-Mar-2004 18:57 GMT
Comment 37Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 19:09 GMT
Comment 38ilwrath08-Mar-2004 19:37 GMT
Comment 39brotheris08-Mar-2004 19:45 GMT
Comment 40Kolbjørn Barmen08-Mar-2004 21:18 GMT
Comment 41MIKE08-Mar-2004 22:37 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous08-Mar-2004 23:00 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous08-Mar-2004 23:14 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous08-Mar-2004 23:34 GMT
Comment 45Daniel Miller09-Mar-2004 00:11 GMT
Comment 46JKD09-Mar-2004 02:44 GMT
Comment 47Don CoxRegistered user09-Mar-2004 07:46 GMT
Comment 48priest09-Mar-2004 10:14 GMT
Comment 49JDoobrey09-Mar-2004 11:46 GMT
Comment 50itix09-Mar-2004 14:29 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous09-Mar-2004 14:45 GMT
Comment 52John Block09-Mar-2004 15:49 GMT
Comment 53Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user09-Mar-2004 16:13 GMT
Comment 54itix09-Mar-2004 16:24 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous09-Mar-2004 18:11 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous09-Mar-2004 19:02 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous09-Mar-2004 19:03 GMT
Comment 58Don CoxRegistered user09-Mar-2004 19:29 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous09-Mar-2004 19:50 GMT
Comment 60Don CoxRegistered user09-Mar-2004 20:02 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous09-Mar-2004 21:21 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous09-Mar-2004 21:49 GMT
Comment 63Don CoxRegistered user10-Mar-2004 07:14 GMT
Comment 64Roj10-Mar-2004 08:24 GMT
Comment 65Roj10-Mar-2004 08:31 GMT
Comment 66Don CoxRegistered user10-Mar-2004 09:56 GMT
Comment 67Anonymous10-Mar-2004 12:31 GMT
Comment 68itix10-Mar-2004 13:03 GMT
Comment 69Bill Hoggett14-Mar-2004 10:45 GMT
Back to Top