19-Apr-2024 13:04 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] IOSPIRIT freezes its own AMIGA-developmentsANN.lu
Posted on 08-Mar-2004 11:53 GMT by Felix Schwarz69 comments
View flat
View list
Felix Schwarz, with immediate effect, freezes the development of fxPAINT, fxSCAN, VHI Studio and the IOUSB- and VHI-drivers. Medusa and IBrowse are external developments and thus are not affected.

All products will stay in distribution. Whether the development will be reactivated at a later point in time mainly depends on the further economical and social development of the market and the profits made with it. The AMIGA-pages can be found at http://amiga.iospirit.de/ in the future. Although www.iospirit.de currently still redirects to this page, we nonetheless would be glad if existing hyperlinks in AMIGA-context would be adapted accordingly.

Subsequently, you'll find an open letter from Felix Schwarz to the AMIGA-community in all its occurences.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1hooligan/dcsRegistered user08-Mar-2004 11:08 GMT
Comment 2takemehomegrandmaRegistered user08-Mar-2004 11:11 GMT
Comment 3Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 11:22 GMT
Comment 4Elwood08-Mar-2004 12:03 GMT
Comment 5Roj08-Mar-2004 12:22 GMT
Comment 6Christophe DecaniniRegistered user08-Mar-2004 12:45 GMT
Comment 7OneVision08-Mar-2004 12:48 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous08-Mar-2004 13:07 GMT
Comment 9spot08-Mar-2004 13:24 GMT
Comment 10takemehomegrandmaRegistered user08-Mar-2004 13:40 GMT
Comment 11mahenRegistered user08-Mar-2004 13:58 GMT
Comment 12MIKE08-Mar-2004 14:06 GMT
Comment 13ilwrath08-Mar-2004 14:17 GMT
Comment 14Elwood08-Mar-2004 15:38 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:38 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:45 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:48 GMT
Comment 18hooligan/dcsRegistered user08-Mar-2004 15:50 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous08-Mar-2004 15:54 GMT
Comment 20ilwrath08-Mar-2004 16:06 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:09 GMT
Comment 22hooligan/dcsRegistered user08-Mar-2004 16:19 GMT
Comment 23Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 16:20 GMT
Comment 24Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 16:24 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:30 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:37 GMT
Comment 27MIKE08-Mar-2004 16:41 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous08-Mar-2004 16:43 GMT
Comment 29ilwrath08-Mar-2004 16:57 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous08-Mar-2004 17:14 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous08-Mar-2004 17:19 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous08-Mar-2004 17:49 GMT
Comment 33Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 17:49 GMT
Comment 34MarkTime08-Mar-2004 18:15 GMT
Comment 35ilwrath08-Mar-2004 18:34 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous08-Mar-2004 18:57 GMT
Comment 37Don CoxRegistered user08-Mar-2004 19:09 GMT
IOSPIRIT freezes its own AMIGA-developments : Comment 38 of 69ANN.lu
Posted by ilwrath on 08-Mar-2004 19:37 GMT
In reply to Comment 36 (Anonymous):
> I buy a product. Somebody invented it, somebody made it, somebody sold it and
> I use it. If it's made of soap or made of bits is splitting hairs.

But that's just it. A bunch of bits by themselves are basically worthless. When you buy software, what you are essentially purchasing is a *license* to do something (hopefully) useful with those bits. On top of that, if the license doesn't include modification rights, you are stuck with JUST THOSE BITS. So, you HOPE that the company that you purchased this license from, will be around to help you make use of those bits!

As Don said... It might still be a fair trade, if the company sticks around and is able to provide support and updates to keep those bits being able to do useful things. But software needs to keep changing and updating to be useful. Once those updates stop, most likely, the bits you "purchased" will be useless and worthless in a very short time. Be it from being unable to be used on modern hardware, or being unable to interface with newer standards, or whatever.

Therefore, in terms of value, I STILL say software transactions should be viewed more as service contract than physical product.
Jump...
#44 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 39brotheris08-Mar-2004 19:45 GMT
Comment 40Kolbjørn Barmen08-Mar-2004 21:18 GMT
Comment 41MIKE08-Mar-2004 22:37 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous08-Mar-2004 23:00 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous08-Mar-2004 23:14 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous08-Mar-2004 23:34 GMT
Comment 45Daniel Miller09-Mar-2004 00:11 GMT
Comment 46JKD09-Mar-2004 02:44 GMT
Comment 47Don CoxRegistered user09-Mar-2004 07:46 GMT
Comment 48priest09-Mar-2004 10:14 GMT
Comment 49JDoobrey09-Mar-2004 11:46 GMT
Comment 50itix09-Mar-2004 14:29 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous09-Mar-2004 14:45 GMT
Comment 52John Block09-Mar-2004 15:49 GMT
Comment 53Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user09-Mar-2004 16:13 GMT
Comment 54itix09-Mar-2004 16:24 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous09-Mar-2004 18:11 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous09-Mar-2004 19:02 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous09-Mar-2004 19:03 GMT
Comment 58Don CoxRegistered user09-Mar-2004 19:29 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous09-Mar-2004 19:50 GMT
Comment 60Don CoxRegistered user09-Mar-2004 20:02 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous09-Mar-2004 21:21 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous09-Mar-2004 21:49 GMT
Comment 63Don CoxRegistered user10-Mar-2004 07:14 GMT
Comment 64Roj10-Mar-2004 08:24 GMT
Comment 65Roj10-Mar-2004 08:31 GMT
Comment 66Don CoxRegistered user10-Mar-2004 09:56 GMT
Comment 67Anonymous10-Mar-2004 12:31 GMT
Comment 68itix10-Mar-2004 13:03 GMT
Comment 69Bill Hoggett14-Mar-2004 10:45 GMT
Back to Top