12-Dec-2024 22:22 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Files] New Amithlon 1.29 update availableANN.lu
Posted on 11-Mar-2004 20:42 GMT by top (Edited on 2004-03-12 18:05:13 GMT by Christophe Decanini)73 comments
View flat
View list
the New update for Amithlon to run AmigaOS3.9 under PC hardware via Linux Drivers :

° Amithlon Kernel compatible Linux PCI drivers : PC network chipsets, PC sound chipsets

° Added new version of the XCat Utility (Thanks to Bernd Meyer)

° FIX: Somehow the name of the installed amithlon1_com.device was wrong!

Available for download in Aminet link file: Amithlon 1.29 update

Author: geit@gmx.de (Guido Mersmann)

Author: amithlon@amithlon.net (Bernd Meyer)
and
Author: support@vmc.de (Harald Frank, VMC)
Author: bvernoux@wanadoo.fr (Benjamin Vernoux, Titan)
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1takemehomegrandmaRegistered user11-Mar-2004 20:20 GMT
Comment 2brotheris11-Mar-2004 20:36 GMT
Comment 3takemehomegrandmaRegistered user11-Mar-2004 20:48 GMT
Comment 4brotheris11-Mar-2004 20:55 GMT
Comment 5takemehomegrandmaRegistered user11-Mar-2004 21:38 GMT
Comment 6brotheris11-Mar-2004 22:07 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous11-Mar-2004 22:09 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous11-Mar-2004 22:28 GMT
Comment 9red vs blue11-Mar-2004 22:40 GMT
Comment 10anon11-Mar-2004 22:55 GMT
Comment 11Megol11-Mar-2004 23:42 GMT
Comment 12Bla_head12-Mar-2004 02:35 GMT
Comment 13Kjetil12-Mar-2004 06:45 GMT
Comment 14Don CoxRegistered user12-Mar-2004 07:18 GMT
Comment 15Don CoxRegistered user12-Mar-2004 07:21 GMT
Comment 16Ole-Egil12-Mar-2004 08:00 GMT
Comment 17code12-Mar-2004 08:06 GMT
Comment 18brotheris12-Mar-2004 08:16 GMT
Comment 19froggie12-Mar-2004 08:21 GMT
Comment 20Crumb // AATRegistered user12-Mar-2004 08:39 GMT
Comment 21top12-Mar-2004 08:47 GMT
New Amithlon 1.29 update available : Comment 22 of 73ANN.lu
Posted by Kjetil on 12-Mar-2004 09:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (Don Cox):
Bernie’s JIT can possibly convert the byte order to INTEL/AMD format, it has to be inn Motorola format, at the code expects it to be.

<convert><do math><convert back> or else you will get byte order distortion, and possibly lots of programs will fail, this is the biggest problem when you recompile a program from Intel to PPC. So in other words you lot’s of CPU power. Approximately ¼ of the total power is lost in data conversions at worst case scenario.

How ever there are some cases where there is no need to swap data, example
Move.l (a0),(a1)
As long as it’s stored in the same way as It where read. This operation will give you 100% of total power

Jit only replaces 68k assembler whit INTEL assembler, the emulation is the same.
Jump...
#43 Bernie Meyer
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 23ujb12-Mar-2004 09:10 GMT
Comment 24Kjetil12-Mar-2004 09:14 GMT
Comment 25Kjetil12-Mar-2004 09:15 GMT
Comment 26Kjetil12-Mar-2004 09:24 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous12-Mar-2004 09:28 GMT
Comment 28Bla_head12-Mar-2004 09:38 GMT
Comment 29Bla_head12-Mar-2004 09:39 GMT
Comment 30brotheris12-Mar-2004 09:41 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous12-Mar-2004 10:36 GMT
Comment 32Kryler12-Mar-2004 10:49 GMT
Comment 33miksuh12-Mar-2004 11:34 GMT
Comment 34miksuh12-Mar-2004 11:40 GMT
Comment 35miksuh12-Mar-2004 11:41 GMT
Comment 36Martin Blom12-Mar-2004 11:49 GMT
Comment 37Kjetil12-Mar-2004 12:18 GMT
Comment 38brotheris12-Mar-2004 12:30 GMT
Comment 39miksuh12-Mar-2004 12:31 GMT
Comment 40itix12-Mar-2004 12:33 GMT
Comment 41Bernie MeyerRegistered user12-Mar-2004 13:31 GMT
Comment 42Kronos12-Mar-2004 13:33 GMT
Comment 43Bernie MeyerRegistered user12-Mar-2004 13:41 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous12-Mar-2004 14:10 GMT
Comment 45Bernie MeyerRegistered user12-Mar-2004 14:29 GMT
Comment 46Crumb // AATRegistered user12-Mar-2004 14:38 GMT
Comment 47T_Bone12-Mar-2004 17:02 GMT
Comment 48Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user12-Mar-2004 17:49 GMT
Comment 49Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user12-Mar-2004 17:50 GMT
Comment 50Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user12-Mar-2004 18:10 GMT
Comment 51itix12-Mar-2004 22:28 GMT
Comment 52Bernie MeyerRegistered user13-Mar-2004 03:31 GMT
Comment 53Bernie MeyerRegistered user13-Mar-2004 03:33 GMT
Comment 54Jupp313-Mar-2004 05:58 GMT
Comment 55Don CoxRegistered user13-Mar-2004 06:05 GMT
Comment 56Don CoxRegistered user13-Mar-2004 06:07 GMT
Comment 57Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user13-Mar-2004 08:11 GMT
Comment 58Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user13-Mar-2004 08:12 GMT
Comment 59hammer13-Mar-2004 08:35 GMT
Comment 60ikirRegistered user13-Mar-2004 09:45 GMT
Comment 61Megol13-Mar-2004 20:44 GMT
Comment 62Megol13-Mar-2004 21:52 GMT
Comment 63Kjetil13-Mar-2004 22:00 GMT
Comment 64Lost souls13-Mar-2004 23:47 GMT
Comment 65Kjetil14-Mar-2004 02:00 GMT
Comment 66Kjetil14-Mar-2004 02:26 GMT
Comment 67Crumb // AATRegistered user15-Mar-2004 08:54 GMT
Comment 68Crumb // AATRegistered user15-Mar-2004 15:10 GMT
Comment 69Kjetil15-Mar-2004 16:27 GMT
Comment 70Crumb // AATRegistered user15-Mar-2004 16:49 GMT
Comment 71Kjetil15-Mar-2004 17:47 GMT
Comment 72Kjetil15-Mar-2004 18:04 GMT
Comment 73Kjetil15-Mar-2004 18:19 GMT
Back to Top