28-Mar-2024 13:35 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back!ANN.lu
Posted on 16-Mar-2004 06:09 GMT by samface129 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga Inc. has returned to the court, backed up with legal representation, new evidence and testimonies. With these resources, the defendant Amiga Inc. has managed to come up with a response to plaintiff's motion to modify order granting specific performance, no less than six declarations, and a certificate of service.

The names of those who have filed a declaration are:

Barrie J. Moss AKA "Fleecy" (Amiga Inc.), Evert Carton (Hyperion), Garry Hare (KMOS), Ray A. Akey (Amiga Inc.) and Bill McEwen (Amiga Inc.).

Furthermore, Ray A. Akey filed 11 new exhibits (exhibit A-J) along with his declaration, which are recurringly refered to throughout these new case filings.

You can read all about it here:
http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Some Farker16-Mar-2004 05:37 GMT
Comment 2Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 05:41 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 4Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 06:15 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:20 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:24 GMT
Comment 7Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 06:25 GMT
Comment 8Darrin16-Mar-2004 06:27 GMT
Comment 9Lando16-Mar-2004 06:29 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous16-Mar-2004 06:35 GMT
Comment 11Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 06:41 GMT
Comment 12Atheist216-Mar-2004 06:46 GMT
Comment 13Darrin16-Mar-2004 06:47 GMT
Comment 14Lennart Fridén16-Mar-2004 06:48 GMT
Comment 15Atheist216-Mar-2004 06:56 GMT
Comment 16Lennart Fridén16-Mar-2004 07:07 GMT
Comment 17Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 07:09 GMT
Comment 18XraalE16-Mar-2004 07:16 GMT
Comment 19Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:18 GMT
Comment 20Eva16-Mar-2004 07:21 GMT
Comment 21Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:23 GMT
Comment 22Bill Hoggett16-Mar-2004 07:33 GMT
Comment 23Graham_nli16-Mar-2004 07:43 GMT
Comment 24Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:55 GMT
Comment 25Darrin16-Mar-2004 07:55 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous16-Mar-2004 08:00 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous16-Mar-2004 08:00 GMT
Comment 28pixie16-Mar-2004 08:26 GMT
Comment 29Peter Gordon16-Mar-2004 08:42 GMT
Comment 30Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 08:44 GMT
Comment 31itix16-Mar-2004 08:55 GMT
Comment 32Cluke16-Mar-2004 08:59 GMT
Comment 33Eva16-Mar-2004 09:07 GMT
Comment 34hammer16-Mar-2004 09:14 GMT
Comment 35priest16-Mar-2004 10:26 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous16-Mar-2004 10:40 GMT
Comment 37Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 10:44 GMT
Comment 38Ferry16-Mar-2004 11:01 GMT
Comment 39Ronald St-Maurice16-Mar-2004 11:11 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous16-Mar-2004 11:17 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous16-Mar-2004 11:37 GMT
Comment 42Gabriele FavrinRegistered user16-Mar-2004 11:38 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous16-Mar-2004 11:51 GMT
Comment 44Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 12:18 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous16-Mar-2004 12:39 GMT
Comment 46T1k16-Mar-2004 12:46 GMT
Comment 47Rich Woods16-Mar-2004 12:49 GMT
Comment 48Rich Woods16-Mar-2004 13:04 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous16-Mar-2004 13:09 GMT
Comment 50Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:16 GMT
Comment 51Gabriele FavrinRegistered user16-Mar-2004 13:46 GMT
Comment 52Bill Hoggett16-Mar-2004 13:57 GMT
Comment 53Bill Hoggett16-Mar-2004 14:00 GMT
Comment 54Darrin16-Mar-2004 14:39 GMT
Comment 55Darrin16-Mar-2004 14:43 GMT
Comment 56acg16-Mar-2004 15:21 GMT
Comment 57takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Mar-2004 15:51 GMT
Comment 58Anonymous16-Mar-2004 15:54 GMT
Comment 59Bill Hickman16-Mar-2004 15:57 GMT
Comment 60Lennart Fridén16-Mar-2004 17:03 GMT
Comment 61Lennart Fridén16-Mar-2004 17:11 GMT
Comment 62Damien McKenna16-Mar-2004 17:30 GMT
Comment 63T1k16-Mar-2004 18:02 GMT
Comment 64MIKE16-Mar-2004 18:08 GMT
Comment 65Amon_ReRegistered user16-Mar-2004 18:29 GMT
Comment 66Bill McEwen16-Mar-2004 20:21 GMT
Comment 67cheesegrate16-Mar-2004 20:55 GMT
Comment 68Lost souls16-Mar-2004 21:13 GMT
Comment 69Gregg16-Mar-2004 21:14 GMT
Comment 70Some Farker16-Mar-2004 21:22 GMT
Comment 71cheesegrate16-Mar-2004 21:27 GMT
Comment 72Some Farker16-Mar-2004 21:52 GMT
Comment 73MIKE16-Mar-2004 22:09 GMT
Comment 74Gregg16-Mar-2004 23:30 GMT
Comment 75Darrin17-Mar-2004 00:38 GMT
Comment 76Joe "Floid" Kanowitz17-Mar-2004 00:41 GMT
Comment 77Doobrey17-Mar-2004 01:18 GMT
Comment 78Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 02:12 GMT
Comment 79gary_c17-Mar-2004 02:20 GMT
Comment 80Spitballz17-Mar-2004 02:53 GMT
Comment 81Seehund17-Mar-2004 08:32 GMT
Comment 82Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 09:21 GMT
Comment 83Anonymous17-Mar-2004 12:47 GMT
Comment 84Anonymous17-Mar-2004 12:56 GMT
Comment 85Seehund17-Mar-2004 14:18 GMT
Comment 86Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 14:29 GMT
Comment 87Seehund17-Mar-2004 14:41 GMT
Comment 88Gregg17-Mar-2004 14:48 GMT
Comment 89Gregg17-Mar-2004 14:56 GMT
Comment 90Darrin17-Mar-2004 15:15 GMT
Comment 91Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 15:20 GMT
Comment 92Seehund17-Mar-2004 15:20 GMT
Comment 93Gregg17-Mar-2004 15:22 GMT
Comment 94Gregg17-Mar-2004 15:26 GMT
Comment 95Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 15:34 GMT
Comment 96Don CoxRegistered user17-Mar-2004 16:18 GMT
Comment 97Plaz17-Mar-2004 16:20 GMT
Comment 98Gregg17-Mar-2004 16:38 GMT
Comment 99Gregg17-Mar-2004 16:48 GMT
Comment 100Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 17:09 GMT
Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back! : Comment 101 of 129ANN.lu
Posted by Don Cox on 17-Mar-2004 17:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 100 (Graham_nli):
"No ... however satire is satire - you know you are getting satire from Public Eye, The Onion. A forged e-mail posted as the truth is not satire! It is a forged e-mail."

This forum has a tradition of people posting spoof messages and hoax news items. You might prefer it didn't, but it would be easy to demonstrate. The immediate reaction to that email shows that readers do expect hoaxes here.

Adam is safe from jail, I think.
Jump...
#104 Graham_nli
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 102Anonymous17-Mar-2004 20:52 GMT
Comment 103Gregg17-Mar-2004 21:11 GMT
Comment 104Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 23:39 GMT
Comment 105Lost souls18-Mar-2004 01:54 GMT
Comment 106Darrin18-Mar-2004 03:18 GMT
Comment 107Don CoxRegistered user18-Mar-2004 06:49 GMT
Comment 108Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 14:38 GMT
Comment 109Gregg18-Mar-2004 16:06 GMT
Comment 110Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 16:44 GMT
Comment 111Gregg18-Mar-2004 16:51 GMT
Comment 112Gregg18-Mar-2004 17:09 GMT
Comment 113Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 17:58 GMT
Comment 114Gregg18-Mar-2004 19:37 GMT
Comment 115Interesting18-Mar-2004 19:55 GMT
Comment 116Interesting18-Mar-2004 20:00 GMT
Comment 117Interesting18-Mar-2004 20:03 GMT
Comment 118Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 20:16 GMT
Comment 119Gregg19-Mar-2004 00:31 GMT
Comment 120Graham_nli19-Mar-2004 00:46 GMT
Comment 121Graham_nli19-Mar-2004 00:54 GMT
Comment 122Graham_nli19-Mar-2004 00:56 GMT
Comment 123interesting19-Mar-2004 05:35 GMT
Comment 124interesting19-Mar-2004 05:42 GMT
Comment 125Ketzer19-Mar-2004 06:19 GMT
Comment 126Gregg19-Mar-2004 13:16 GMT
Comment 127Ketzer19-Mar-2004 14:19 GMT
Comment 128Gregg19-Mar-2004 14:54 GMT
Comment 129D-Dan21-Mar-2004 00:53 GMT
Back to Top