[News] Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back! | ANN.lu |
Posted on 16-Mar-2004 06:09 GMT by samface | 129 comments View flat View list |
Amiga Inc. has returned to the court, backed up with legal representation, new evidence and testimonies. With these resources, the defendant Amiga Inc. has managed to come up with a response to plaintiff's motion to modify order granting specific performance, no less than six declarations, and a certificate of service.
The names of those who have filed a declaration are:
Barrie J. Moss AKA "Fleecy" (Amiga Inc.), Evert Carton (Hyperion), Garry Hare (KMOS), Ray A. Akey (Amiga Inc.) and Bill McEwen (Amiga Inc.).
Furthermore, Ray A. Akey filed 11 new exhibits (exhibit A-J) along with his declaration, which are recurringly refered to throughout these new case filings.
You can read all about it here:
http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back! : Comment 112 of 129 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Gregg on 18-Mar-2004 17:09 GMT | In reply to Comment 110 (Graham_nli): Your statement is incorrect:
No it isn't - it's a "summary"; you might claim that it is incomplete, but I'm pretty sure you realise that I was deliberately simplifying things to ease comprehension - sadly a wasted effort in this case. Curiously, you add to McEwen's statement, but you still omit some things - so are you incorrect too?
Let's try again :
A: "I sent stuff to Amiga Inc."
B: "We received nothing from Thendic,
Allegedly
moreso other people did manage to send us stuff at that address that he says he sent stuff to."
Allegedly.
See the problem? You damn Buck because he doesn't provide proof, but take McEwen's word, equally lacking in proof, as gospel. Again, I ask why, and again despair at the futility of asking such a simple and straightforward question.
If you really want to get into detail, you should consider that McEwen seems to think it perfectly normal that people should try to send stuff to a business at an address that they have been evicted from.
Furthermore Amiga Inc showed that proof of sending and non-reception is possible to get, by their submission of their failure of reception of stuff they sent to Thendic's currently listed address.
The absence of proof is not proof of anything; again, this is not a difficult concept, and you should be able to grasp it without too much effort.
Gregg |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|