[News] Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back! | ANN.lu |
Posted on 16-Mar-2004 06:09 GMT by samface | 129 comments View flat View list |
Amiga Inc. has returned to the court, backed up with legal representation, new evidence and testimonies. With these resources, the defendant Amiga Inc. has managed to come up with a response to plaintiff's motion to modify order granting specific performance, no less than six declarations, and a certificate of service.
The names of those who have filed a declaration are:
Barrie J. Moss AKA "Fleecy" (Amiga Inc.), Evert Carton (Hyperion), Garry Hare (KMOS), Ray A. Akey (Amiga Inc.) and Bill McEwen (Amiga Inc.).
Furthermore, Ray A. Akey filed 11 new exhibits (exhibit A-J) along with his declaration, which are recurringly refered to throughout these new case filings.
You can read all about it here:
http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back! : Comment 81 of 129 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Seehund on 17-Mar-2004 08:32 GMT | In reply to Comment 78 (Graham_nli): Anyway, it would be interesting to wonder if you did that all on your own, or whether someone suggested to you to make a post containing an e-mail purporting to be from Fleecy containing certain content.
Yeah, because there's no way the truth would come out. In fact, it's so safe to do this that the mysterious Someone would do all this and then send it in to a court as knowingly fabricated evidence against a company employing the impersonated person. They'll never find out! Mouahahahaaaah!
Sheesh. Is this [wrongpla|amigaworld].net?
As a side note, Fleecy's recent declaration to the court is the only tangible evidence that it was a fake to begin with. AInc sent a bunch of clippings from Internet forums (not even the forum where the fake was posted) where a person, whose only credentials and identifiable features was being able to type "cheesegrate" in a text entry field, claimed to be the one who posted the e-mail and that is was a fake. Akey declares that he's been in contact with Adam C (cheesegrate, but none of that correspondence was submitted to the court.
Speaking of clippings from web forums; despite all these people (NO LESS THAN SIX!!! ;)) declaring things, AInc failed to produce one single statement from the plaintiff made BEFORE or AT THE TIME the "OEM Licensing Agreement" was signed (Nov. 2000). Wouldn't this be the only relevant thing, to try to prove that the plaintiff somehow knew that AmigaOS and DE/AA/AACE/AG242/yadayada were/would become separate products when they signed the contract? Why send in all this crap if it's irrelevant?
BTW, "Amiga vs Thendic"? We're talking about the (closed) "Thendic vs Amiga" case here, aren't we? Isn't the plaintiff supposed to be written first? |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|