[News] Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back! | ANN.lu |
Posted on 16-Mar-2004 06:09 GMT by samface | 129 comments View flat View list |
Amiga Inc. has returned to the court, backed up with legal representation, new evidence and testimonies. With these resources, the defendant Amiga Inc. has managed to come up with a response to plaintiff's motion to modify order granting specific performance, no less than six declarations, and a certificate of service.
The names of those who have filed a declaration are:
Barrie J. Moss AKA "Fleecy" (Amiga Inc.), Evert Carton (Hyperion), Garry Hare (KMOS), Ray A. Akey (Amiga Inc.) and Bill McEwen (Amiga Inc.).
Furthermore, Ray A. Akey filed 11 new exhibits (exhibit A-J) along with his declaration, which are recurringly refered to throughout these new case filings.
You can read all about it here:
http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Amiga vs Thendic Update: Amiga is Back! : Comment 92 of 129 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Seehund on 17-Mar-2004 15:20 GMT | In reply to Comment 86 (Graham_nli): > [faked on BBRV's initiative] what for? To make
> BBRV appear stupid before the court?
> I don't think that BBRV expected any kind of resistance from Amiga Inc at all.
Come on, you don't need to be a lawyer hired by AInc to point out to a court if they have gotten false evidence, do you? For example, an "it has come to my attention" letter from Fleecy would be quite enough, wouldn't it? Submitting a faked statement from a third party who doesn't follow the proceedings might have worked in some court case somewhere, but I can't see how submitting a faked statement from either the defendant or the plaintiff themselves could possibly work.
Besides, why would BBRV hire/ask/force/blackmail/threaten/bribe/whatever cheesegrate to post a fake e-mail to a messageboard, instead of simply doing it themselves? Cheesy's got that renowned author and impersonation skills? :)
This must be one of the most fragile conspiracy theories I've seen during the last few years, including everything about NASA and the Illuminati. :)
> Anyway, the IP address was in Australia, so that does rule out Fleecy
> regardless of who wrote the forged e-mail.
http://ann.lu/detail.cgi?category=forum&file=1077728127.msg
The quoted "e-mail" didn't come with detailed mail transfer headers. It was the ANN post that was from Australia (where the invented submitter "John Burgess" also claimed he came from).
> And it is odd that an e-mail was forged with certain content that would
> suddenly support bbrv's court case amendment.
The plaintiff's suggested amendment to the verdict doesn't depend exclusively on this single piece of "evidence", there's no need for BBRV to forge anything like this to begin with. Had it been real, it would just be another inch on the heap that the plaintiff feels that he's already got supporting him.
BBRV and their lawyer have exhibited transient braindeath when picking this one piece of evidence. Now that evidence will be thrown out on routine as it should. Yet another amusing tidbit has passed under our eyes. The non-event is over. My popcorn is getting cold. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|