19-Apr-2024 19:10 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Order on Plantiff's Motion in Thendic Amiga CaseANN.lu
Posted on 18-Mar-2004 04:10 GMT by Rich Woods81 comments
View flat
View list
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Order re 47 Court's Order Granting Specific Performance, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(AF, ) (Entered: 03/17/2004) ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Order re 47 Court's Order Granting Specific Performance, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(AF, ) (Entered: 03/17/2004)<

Get it HERE

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Gregg18-Mar-2004 03:13 GMT
Comment 2Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 03:22 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous18-Mar-2004 03:31 GMT
Order on Plantiff's Motion in Thendic Amiga Case : Comment 4 of 81ANN.lu
Posted by gary_c on 18-Mar-2004 04:19 GMT
To save a trip across the Net, here is the essence of it, quoted from the PDF file Rich posted:

"To the extent plaintiffs seek modification of the February 19, 2004, Order to include a list of the related items to which plaintiffs must be given access, the motion is GRANTED. To the extent plaintiffs are attempting to rewrite the License Agreement to cover operating systems other than Amiga's DE Operating System, the motion is DENIED.

"For all of the foregoing reasons, page 2, lines 8-12 of the Court's Order of February 19, 2004, is hereby amended as follows:

[cited paragraph]Plaintiffs are entitled to specific performance as requested in the complaint, 'i.e., integration of Amiga's DE Operating System into Thendic's Pegasos and/or other products in question.' Complaint at 2. Defendant shall, within thirty days of the date of this Order, grant plaintiffs rights and possession of the DE Operating System, along with the 'Enhancements,' 'Updates,' 'Upgrades,' and 'Documentation' that are related to that system, for integration into Pegasos.[end cited paragraph]"

So it looks like the next order of business for Amiga, Inc., now apparently relieved of the AmigaOS distraction by selling it to Itec/KMOS, is to get AmigaDE running on a Pegasos. The order is dated March 12, so apparently the responses filed by Amiga and friends on March 15 weren't a factor in the judge's decision.

-- gary_c
Jump...
#5 Rich Woods
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 5Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 04:43 GMT
Comment 6James Carroll18-Mar-2004 04:54 GMT
Comment 7hooligan/dcsRegistered user18-Mar-2004 06:08 GMT
Comment 8Don CoxRegistered user18-Mar-2004 06:38 GMT
Comment 9Ferry18-Mar-2004 07:31 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous18-Mar-2004 07:47 GMT
Comment 11hooligan/dcsRegistered user18-Mar-2004 08:22 GMT
Comment 12Don CoxRegistered user18-Mar-2004 08:42 GMT
Comment 13Joe "Floid" Kanowitz18-Mar-2004 09:00 GMT
Comment 14Joe "Floid" Kanowitz18-Mar-2004 09:07 GMT
Comment 15priest18-Mar-2004 13:31 GMT
Comment 16Bill Toner18-Mar-2004 13:56 GMT
Comment 17Sir Lancelot Du Lac18-Mar-2004 13:59 GMT
Comment 18Spitballz18-Mar-2004 14:01 GMT
Comment 19Steffen Haeuser18-Mar-2004 14:13 GMT
Comment 20John Block18-Mar-2004 14:15 GMT
Comment 21MarkTime18-Mar-2004 14:17 GMT
Comment 22Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 14:22 GMT
Comment 23Leif18-Mar-2004 14:26 GMT
Comment 24Coupons and T-shirts18-Mar-2004 14:27 GMT
Comment 25Gregg18-Mar-2004 14:27 GMT
Comment 26hnl_dkRegistered user18-Mar-2004 14:31 GMT
Comment 27Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 14:34 GMT
Comment 28Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 14:41 GMT
Comment 29iam18-Mar-2004 14:41 GMT
Comment 30Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 14:42 GMT
Comment 31Gregg18-Mar-2004 14:49 GMT
Comment 32Bill Toner18-Mar-2004 14:55 GMT
Comment 33Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 15:12 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous18-Mar-2004 15:12 GMT
Comment 35priest18-Mar-2004 15:49 GMT
Comment 36Gregg18-Mar-2004 15:49 GMT
Comment 37Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 16:02 GMT
Comment 38Gregg18-Mar-2004 16:12 GMT
Comment 39Crumbs18-Mar-2004 16:14 GMT
Comment 40Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 16:16 GMT
Comment 41Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 16:18 GMT
Comment 42Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 16:21 GMT
Comment 43Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 16:22 GMT
Comment 44Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 16:27 GMT
Comment 45Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 16:28 GMT
Comment 46Gregg18-Mar-2004 16:34 GMT
Comment 47Crumbs18-Mar-2004 16:37 GMT
Comment 48Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 16:45 GMT
Comment 49Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 16:47 GMT
Comment 50Bill Toner18-Mar-2004 17:02 GMT
Comment 51Gregg18-Mar-2004 17:15 GMT
Comment 5218-Mar-2004 17:44 GMT
Comment 53Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 17:45 GMT
Comment 54Joe "Floid" Kanowitz18-Mar-2004 17:48 GMT
Comment 55Gregg18-Mar-2004 19:17 GMT
Comment 56Gregg18-Mar-2004 19:24 GMT
Comment 57Interesting18-Mar-2004 19:26 GMT
Comment 58Interesting18-Mar-2004 19:32 GMT
Comment 59Interesting18-Mar-2004 19:33 GMT
Comment 60Interesting18-Mar-2004 19:36 GMT
Comment 61Interesting18-Mar-2004 19:41 GMT
Comment 62Gregg18-Mar-2004 19:44 GMT
Comment 63Interesting18-Mar-2004 19:52 GMT
Comment 64Gregg18-Mar-2004 20:01 GMT
Comment 65Gregg18-Mar-2004 20:07 GMT
Comment 66Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 21:06 GMT
Comment 67Rich Woods18-Mar-2004 21:07 GMT
Comment 6818-Mar-2004 21:55 GMT
Comment 69Interesting18-Mar-2004 23:16 GMT
Comment 70Graham_nli19-Mar-2004 00:41 GMT
Comment 71Gregg19-Mar-2004 01:51 GMT
Comment 72Gregg19-Mar-2004 01:56 GMT
Comment 73Graham_nli19-Mar-2004 02:20 GMT
Comment 74Atheist219-Mar-2004 03:19 GMT
Comment 75Anonymous19-Mar-2004 05:12 GMT
Comment 76vortexau19-Mar-2004 05:34 GMT
Comment 77vortexau19-Mar-2004 06:38 GMT
Comment 78vortexau19-Mar-2004 06:48 GMT
Comment 79Ronald St-Maurice19-Mar-2004 10:31 GMT
Comment 80Rich Woods21-Mar-2004 00:46 GMT
Comment 81Interesting23-Mar-2004 18:33 GMT
Back to Top