Posted on 06-Apr-2004 07:24 GMT by Christian Kemp (Edited on 2004-04-06 10:09:44 GMT by Christian Kemp) | 1057 comments View flat View list |
I am currently being threatened by my former employer (they are "compelled [to] take action against [me]") for the way I am running ANN, and how this allegedly violates my employment contract with them ("interfere _in any manner_ with any business relationship between the Company and any of its customers or business partners"). This might entail drastic changes to the relative freedom of speech ANN has always allowed its visitors, or ANN might close down altogether. Updated 10:00 CET.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Legal threats? : Comment 351 of 1057 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 06-Apr-2004 18:07 GMT | In reply to Comment 344 (Amon_Re): > Don't need to, you are already back to argueing about shemantics.
No, I'm arguing facts. You attribute to me things I've never said or done. You are the one who is acting dishonestly, not me. You're hatred torwards BBRV makes you blind.
> What Bill said makes perfect sence judging past exchanges with you, you take a
> discussion, find something vague or twistable, and start argueing about petite
> or silly details, without willingness to accept that other people might have a
> different opinion/idea.
I perfectly accept other people's opinion, when they are stated as such. I totally dislike the way people like you talk, instead, that is by means of insults, slanders, unsubstantiated opinions given as facts, and so on and so forth.
> and if someone dares question you you react with arrogant lines like "get your
> head examined".
Please, define "quetion you". I'd not say that making unsubstantiated claims about the motives behind my words is "questioning me", that's just making unsubstantiated claims. Besides, at least I've got more class than you when I feel the need to say something harsher than usual.
> More snide remarks towards Christian,
It's a simple fact, not a remark. Christian is watching this saga without intervening. Can you really negate that?
> Christian isn't the bogeyman in this matter, he's the victim,
Sure, maybe. We don't know yet, we know only what he said. Oh, and I'm inclined to believe him on the fact that BBRV sent him a "threatening" email, and I've already stated what I think about this, and no it was nothing good. But somehow you decide to pick only the words of my posts that further your agenda, twist them and then say I said things I've never really said.
Dishonest, and nothing else. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|