Posted on 06-Apr-2004 07:24 GMT by Christian Kemp (Edited on 2004-04-06 10:09:44 GMT by Christian Kemp) | 1057 comments View flat View list |
I am currently being threatened by my former employer (they are "compelled [to] take action against [me]") for the way I am running ANN, and how this allegedly violates my employment contract with them ("interfere _in any manner_ with any business relationship between the Company and any of its customers or business partners"). This might entail drastic changes to the relative freedom of speech ANN has always allowed its visitors, or ANN might close down altogether. Updated 10:00 CET.
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Legal threats? : Comment 356 of 1057 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Amon_Re on 06-Apr-2004 18:22 GMT | In reply to Comment 351 (Fabio Alemagna): I shouldn't really react to this but oh hell...
> Don't need to, you are already back to argueing about shemantics.
No, I'm arguing facts. You attribute to me things I've never said or done. You are the one who is acting dishonestly, not me. You're hatred torwards BBRV makes you blind.
How i feel about BBRV has nothing to do with how i relate to you or anyone else, if i allowed my opinion about BBRV affect my better judgement, i would not be capable of having intresting talks with people directly or indirectly involved with him/his company.
> What Bill said makes perfect sence judging past exchanges with you, you take a
> discussion, find something vague or twistable, and start argueing about petite
> or silly details, without willingness to accept that other people might have a
> different opinion/idea.
I perfectly accept other people's opinion, when they are stated as such. I totally dislike the way people like you talk, instead, that is by means of insults, slanders, unsubstantiated opinions given as facts, and so on and so forth.
Do i insult people? Yes, it happens, shoot me
Do i slander people? If slander = insults, see above
Do i state unsubstantiated opinions as facts? Nope, i don't
Your portret of me is completely screwed, and perhaps mine is completely out in the left field about you too, but nevertheless you are argueing shemantics and little details that aren't of any importance to the topic at hand, you are yet again focussing on a detail.
> and if someone dares question you you react with arrogant lines like "get your
> head examined".
Please, define "quetion you". I'd not say that making unsubstantiated claims about the motives behind my words is "questioning me", that's just making unsubstantiated claims. Besides, at least I've got more class than you when I feel the need to say something harsher than usual.
And here's the arrogance yet again, the elitist bullshit you tend to spew, i don't know if you do it intentionally, trying to get a reaction from people, but i don't give a flying crap neighter, here are some words of wisdom you might like "Nobody is better then me, but i'm no better then the rest".
As for "motives behind your words", i don't know what your motives are, but all you do is focus on minor, stupid things & drag it over the whole thread.
> More snide remarks towards Christian,
It's a simple fact, not a remark. Christian is watching this saga without intervening. Can you really negate that?
And you say others state opinions as fact?
Ever considered that Christian might be somewhere else?
You are (unwillingly?) undermining Christian's character
> Christian isn't the bogeyman in this matter, he's the victim,
Sure, maybe. We don't know yet, we know only what he said. Oh, and I'm inclined to believe him on the fact that BBRV sent him a "threatening" email, and I've already stated what I think about this, and no it was nothing good. But somehow you decide to pick only the words of my posts that further your agenda, twist them and then say I said things I've never really said.
Fuck my agenda, nothing i said in this thread has anything to do with "my agenda", you want to know what my agenda is? Getting my hands on OS4, that's it, nothing more, nothing less, shocking isn't? And my dislike of BBRV has shit all to do with that.
Fabio, pot - kettle - black
Cheers
Dishonest, and nothing else. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|