20-Apr-2024 12:16 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Files] HTML Tidy 040418 (MorphOS)ANN.lu
Posted on 18-Apr-2004 19:43 GMT by oGALAXYo41 comments
View flat
View list
A new version of HTML Tidy for MorphOS has been created and can be downloaded here. Included is also a diff file which can easily be altered for alternative Amiga solutions.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user18-Apr-2004 17:56 GMT
Comment 2oGALAXYo18-Apr-2004 18:00 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous18-Apr-2004 18:08 GMT
Comment 4oGALAXYo18-Apr-2004 18:11 GMT
Comment 5Jupp318-Apr-2004 18:42 GMT
Comment 6Kid X18-Apr-2004 18:42 GMT
Comment 7hooligan/dcsRegistered user18-Apr-2004 18:55 GMT
Comment 8opi18-Apr-2004 19:00 GMT
Comment 9Jupp318-Apr-2004 19:01 GMT
Comment 10ravek18-Apr-2004 19:03 GMT
Comment 11Kolbjørn Barmen18-Apr-2004 19:09 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous18-Apr-2004 19:26 GMT
Comment 13Amon_ReRegistered user18-Apr-2004 19:41 GMT
Comment 14Amon_ReRegistered user18-Apr-2004 19:45 GMT
Comment 15Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user18-Apr-2004 19:53 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous18-Apr-2004 20:26 GMT
Comment 17Amon_ReRegistered user18-Apr-2004 20:56 GMT
Comment 18Ole-Egil19-Apr-2004 07:28 GMT
Comment 19oGALAXYo19-Apr-2004 07:31 GMT
Comment 20brotheris19-Apr-2004 08:37 GMT
Comment 21Don CoxRegistered user19-Apr-2004 08:59 GMT
Comment 22Kolbjørn Barmen19-Apr-2004 09:05 GMT
Comment 23Ole-Egil19-Apr-2004 09:54 GMT
Comment 24Kolbjørn Barmen19-Apr-2004 10:03 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous19-Apr-2004 10:34 GMT
Comment 26oGALAXYo19-Apr-2004 10:47 GMT
Comment 27brotheris19-Apr-2004 10:47 GMT
Comment 28Ole-Egil19-Apr-2004 11:31 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous19-Apr-2004 12:10 GMT
HTML Tidy 040418 (MorphOS) : Comment 30 of 41ANN.lu
Posted by corwin on 19-Apr-2004 15:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 29 (Anonymous):
>You don't seem to get the point. I'm just pragmatic. Microsoft make the browser
>that virtually all webduhsigner use for minimal validation. I don't care if you
>like that or not: that's not opinion, that's fact. And that makes IE's layout
>details a de-facto standard. Please look up "de-facto" if you don't get the
>meaning (as the rest of your comment suggests since you insist that W3C makes the
>standard, which was never doubted).

What is the de facto standard ? IE5.0 layout ? IE5.01 layout ? IE5.5 layout ? IE6.x layout ? IE5.5 layout with a strict DTD ? Wait a minute... Shouldn't it be MSN Explorer layout ?
Jump...
#36 rez
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 31Anonymous Orc19-Apr-2004 16:58 GMT
Comment 32Kolbjørn Barmen19-Apr-2004 17:30 GMT
Comment 33Ole-Egil19-Apr-2004 17:53 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous19-Apr-2004 18:54 GMT
Comment 35rez19-Apr-2004 19:22 GMT
Comment 36rez19-Apr-2004 19:26 GMT
Comment 37rez19-Apr-2004 19:29 GMT
Comment 38Kolbjørn Barmen19-Apr-2004 20:09 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous19-Apr-2004 20:59 GMT
Comment 40rez19-Apr-2004 23:00 GMT
Comment 41Ole-Egil20-Apr-2004 09:21 GMT
Back to Top