28-Mar-2024 22:01 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] RISC OS vs. AmigaOSANN.lu
Posted on 03-May-2004 03:42 GMT by Ronald St-Maurice22 comments
View flat
View list
Are we so dissimilar? If you asked us to list the troubling issues facing the RISC OS platform right now, the lack of more modern hardware support and the OS development split between Castle and RISCOS Ltd. would probably be there, right at the top, beating other problems like the USB split between Castle and Simtec and the gradual slowdown in software development... More...
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Ole-Egil03-May-2004 11:07 GMT
Comment 2Sammy Nordström03-May-2004 12:25 GMT
Comment 3itix03-May-2004 13:04 GMT
Comment 4pixie03-May-2004 13:09 GMT
Comment 5Amon_ReRegistered user03-May-2004 13:27 GMT
Comment 6Kjetil03-May-2004 13:35 GMT
Comment 7JKD03-May-2004 13:44 GMT
Comment 8Don CoxRegistered user03-May-2004 14:07 GMT
Comment 9Graham_nli03-May-2004 14:50 GMT
Comment 10Darth_XRegistered user03-May-2004 14:56 GMT
RISC OS vs. AmigaOS : Comment 11 of 22ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 03-May-2004 15:10 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Don Cox):
Weren't the Archimedes with Riscos the first end user computers with a program/task bar ?
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 12minator03-May-2004 15:27 GMT
Comment 13Kolbjørn Barmen03-May-2004 16:25 GMT
Comment 14Joe "Floid" Kanowitz03-May-2004 16:57 GMT
Comment 15Ronald St-Maurice03-May-2004 17:14 GMT
Comment 16Seehund03-May-2004 17:36 GMT
Comment 17Graham_nli03-May-2004 20:21 GMT
Comment 18Hammer04-May-2004 08:16 GMT
Comment 19Raffaele05-May-2004 06:40 GMT
Comment 20dirty dave05-May-2004 09:27 GMT
Comment 21Kjetil05-May-2004 19:08 GMT
Comment 22NutsAboutAmiga23-Jun-2004 12:35 GMT
Back to Top