25-Apr-2024 06:42 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Events] Elena Novaretti (ZoneXplorer - PowerIcons) is present with a Peggy II at WEBBITANN.lu
Posted on 08-May-2004 16:00 GMT by Raffaele49 comments
View flat
View list
I have news that Elena Novaretti, author of good software programs such as ZoneXplorer and Power Icons (and a known Pegasos fan and owner) is also present at Webbit Padova with a Pegasos II kindly furnished by Pegasos Italia just for the exhibition event. We expect soon impressions of Webbit show from Elena, and news about the impact which Peggy II made to italian public. Wow!!!

After 10 years of absence to important events here in Italy, two Amiga based platforms are there!

More! I have news that the booth by Virtual Works, Ikir Sector, Soft3, Bitplane (with partecipation by Eyetech, ZetaOS and Cloanto people) IS A DOUBLE-SIZE booth.

Very impressive.

And more, seems that (basing upon Ikir statements on the web), there are two Pegasos at Amiga booth...

Amiga has a Very Very strong presence and a lots of opportunities to impact the public at Webbit Italy.

Good news for our beloved platform.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Ugr08-May-2004 14:55 GMT
Comment 2Don CoxRegistered user08-May-2004 15:05 GMT
Comment 3Kjetil08-May-2004 15:16 GMT
Comment 4Raffaele08-May-2004 16:02 GMT
Comment 5Kjetil08-May-2004 16:17 GMT
Comment 6Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user08-May-2004 16:54 GMT
Comment 7Kronos08-May-2004 16:59 GMT
Comment 8Jupp308-May-2004 17:05 GMT
Comment 9Kjetil08-May-2004 17:12 GMT
Comment 10the man in the shadows08-May-2004 17:16 GMT
Comment 11Joe "Floid" Kanowitz08-May-2004 17:39 GMT
Elena Novaretti (ZoneXplorer - PowerIcons) is present with a Peggy II at WEBBIT : Comment 12 of 49ANN.lu
Posted by Kjetil on 08-May-2004 18:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (Kronos):
Hint: One of the Friedens allready admitted that they will have to write some sort of box
for apps written for AOS1-4.0, once they introduce REAL MP in OS4.x


Yes I know this where used as an argument, and I don't think it's needed,
different rules to different task it all that is needed, the problem so to speak is that 68k programs,
pass arguments using pointers from whit inn the program it self, static vars etc, and not from shared memmory, inn system using isolated memory you can not pass pointers from an read only area, this will force an mmu hit,

We do not won't a fake exec to duplicate arguments and memory areas before passing it on to real execSG, that slow, and it will make every thing use twice the amount of CPU time,

Some one will argue that they have implemented the perfect box, and that they do not pass/duplicate arguments between the core kernel and the fake kernel, all the fake kernel is do all the memory allocation and reassure management by it self, if that is the case how the hell is your system able to communicate whit the other boxes,

2nd hint: the number of layers does say almost nothing about the overall efficenty,

WindowsXP, MacOSX, nice preforming OS, NOT.

WindowsXP = DOS + Win3.1 + WinMe + WinNT + Java + VB
MacOSX = OS8.0 + OS9.0 + Alian kernel + Java
MoprhOS = Quark + ABOX + (QBOX inn development)
AmigaOS4.0 = ExecSG + (68k task emulation)
AmigaOS4.x = ExecSG + "68k BOX"
AROS = AROS

Every task takes up CPU time, every driver takes up CPU time, every Box takes up CPU time.

only the quality of those layers does

If the box is resident, it takes up CPU time,

nd you can have a completly f***ed up OS by just trying to mix to many ideas and concepts into the only layer you got.

just like A/BOX contains 68k + PUP + WUP support.

yes it's hard and difficult task to make a system run on task emulation bases, given they you most be able to expand on the old, whit out braking an egg or tow, some times it's worth breaking an egg inn the process,
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 13Anonymous08-May-2004 18:41 GMT
Comment 14Kjetil08-May-2004 19:00 GMT
Comment 15Kronos08-May-2004 19:17 GMT
Comment 16Nicolas Sallin08-May-2004 19:43 GMT
Comment 17Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user08-May-2004 20:10 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous08-May-2004 20:54 GMT
Comment 19Kjetil08-May-2004 21:49 GMT
Comment 20Kronos09-May-2004 05:28 GMT
Comment 21cheesegrate09-May-2004 05:33 GMT
Comment 22stefkos09-May-2004 06:17 GMT
Comment 23Don CoxRegistered user09-May-2004 06:32 GMT
Comment 24Kjetil09-May-2004 08:01 GMT
Comment 25koan09-May-2004 08:27 GMT
Comment 26Kjetil09-May-2004 08:33 GMT
Comment 27Kjetil09-May-2004 08:35 GMT
Comment 28brotheris09-May-2004 08:40 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil09-May-2004 09:19 GMT
Comment 30Don CoxRegistered user09-May-2004 09:37 GMT
Comment 31Andrea Maniero09-May-2004 10:06 GMT
Comment 32Raffaele09-May-2004 10:14 GMT
Comment 33Lecta09-May-2004 12:13 GMT
Comment 34Sigbjørn Skjæret09-May-2004 12:19 GMT
Comment 35Kjetil09-May-2004 14:13 GMT
Comment 36Sigbjørn Skjæret09-May-2004 15:27 GMT
Comment 37koan09-May-2004 18:25 GMT
Comment 38ikirRegistered user09-May-2004 18:57 GMT
Comment 39Miky06009-May-2004 20:23 GMT
Comment 40Miky06009-May-2004 20:24 GMT
Comment 41cecilia10-May-2004 15:22 GMT
Comment 42Lecta10-May-2004 15:54 GMT
Comment 43Libero AT & ATGraphics11-May-2004 07:25 GMT
Comment 44Raffaele11-May-2004 10:06 GMT
Comment 45Libero Moschella11-May-2004 15:01 GMT
Comment 46Kjetil11-May-2004 18:07 GMT
Comment 47Kjetil11-May-2004 18:26 GMT
Comment 48Sigbjørn Skjæret11-May-2004 19:34 GMT
Comment 49Sigbjørn Skjæret11-May-2004 19:41 GMT
Back to Top