23-Apr-2024 14:58 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] I just wanted to share this:ANN.lu
Posted on 10-Jul-2004 11:18 GMT by Hagge12 comments
View flat
View list
What about improved AGA? What about 800x600, 72Hz on your low end Amiga? What about this beeing news 1992. Makes your dreaming doesn't it?
Find out what I'm talking about. Was searching for the memory bandwidth of AGA and found this on google. A friend was complaing about a few new radeons having 128-bit memory access so I wanted to show him something to compare with.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Hagge10-Jul-2004 09:21 GMT
Comment 2Graham_NLI10-Jul-2004 10:10 GMT
Comment 3itix10-Jul-2004 10:28 GMT
Comment 4pixie10-Jul-2004 11:08 GMT
Comment 5Graham_NLI10-Jul-2004 11:11 GMT
Comment 6Darth_XRegistered user10-Jul-2004 15:36 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous10-Jul-2004 16:05 GMT
Comment 8Graham_NLI10-Jul-2004 23:34 GMT
Comment 9the man in the shadows10-Jul-2004 23:41 GMT
I just wanted to share this: : Comment 10 of 12ANN.lu
Posted by Christian on 11-Jul-2004 00:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 9 (the man in the shadows):
> I think someone needs to ask what Dave Haynie thinks about an updated AGA chipset.

Why? Didn't you read this on the bottom of the first linked website?

"Gateway/AI would have been insane to continue AAA. It would have been
revolutionary if released in 1990, pretty cool in 1992, ok in 1994 (the
earliest it could have been released on the schedule we had, with a
healthy Commodore). Today, it would be a horribly expensive thing with
less graphics performance than any old everyday $10 PCI-based SVGA
graphics chip. There is simply no point whatsoever. And that's spelled
"HAYNIE"...
- Dave Haynie, Team Amiga ML, 3/5/99."
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 11Damien McKenna11-Jul-2004 01:06 GMT
Comment 12Chris Hodges11-Jul-2004 15:33 GMT
Back to Top