29-Mar-2024 00:04 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] MUI 3.9 for 68kANN.lu
Posted on 16-Jul-2004 17:46 GMT by mui freak37 comments
View flat
View list
Hi,
we all know that the pre-release of OS4 is shipped with a plain 68k version of MUI 3.9. Now, I'm interested if it would be possible to install this version on a classic Amiga? Will it work? Or is there some hacky code to prevent it from being runned on a real Amiga? Please guys, let me know. This finally would be a way to have all those bug fixes from MUI 3.9 on our mc68k's. I'm not interested in OS4, but I would buy the pre-relase just for this MUI 3.9 if it runs on my A4000 properly....
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous16-Jul-2004 15:55 GMT
Comment 2Zerohero16-Jul-2004 16:52 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous16-Jul-2004 17:48 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous16-Jul-2004 18:23 GMT
Comment 5mark16-Jul-2004 19:01 GMT
Comment 6Richi16-Jul-2004 19:36 GMT
Comment 7koan16-Jul-2004 20:20 GMT
Comment 8Amon_ReRegistered user16-Jul-2004 20:41 GMT
Comment 9XraalE16-Jul-2004 20:46 GMT
Comment 10itix16-Jul-2004 21:19 GMT
Comment 11smithy16-Jul-2004 21:43 GMT
Comment 12James Carroll16-Jul-2004 23:06 GMT
Comment 13Richi17-Jul-2004 05:55 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous17-Jul-2004 06:52 GMT
Comment 15Richi17-Jul-2004 07:43 GMT
Comment 16insider17-Jul-2004 07:46 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:33 GMT
MUI 3.9 for 68k : Comment 18 of 37ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 17-Jul-2004 08:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 16 (insider):
strange you say that - because OS4 MUI 3.9 has new features. and its also damn fast - just look at the OS4 preview videos that have been posted recently.

oh! and if coders really really feel like it, theres no reason why their OS4 PowerPC native apps cant use MUI - its NOT just limited to legacy 68k programs.
(Already the PPC native version of YAM uses MUI for example!)
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 19Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:36 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:40 GMT
Comment 21Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 08:40 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:41 GMT
Comment 23Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 08:42 GMT
Comment 24Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 09:01 GMT
Comment 25itix17-Jul-2004 09:12 GMT
Comment 26koan17-Jul-2004 14:22 GMT
Comment 27koan17-Jul-2004 14:24 GMT
Comment 28Emeric SH17-Jul-2004 15:32 GMT
Comment 29Richi17-Jul-2004 16:13 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous17-Jul-2004 16:32 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous18-Jul-2004 06:20 GMT
Comment 32Don CoxRegistered user18-Jul-2004 08:29 GMT
Comment 33koan18-Jul-2004 11:34 GMT
Comment 34Richi18-Jul-2004 16:02 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous18-Jul-2004 17:10 GMT
Comment 36Richi18-Jul-2004 19:09 GMT
Comment 37koan19-Jul-2004 07:11 GMT
Back to Top