02-Dec-2020 21:39 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] MUI 3.9 for 68kANN.lu
Posted on 16-Jul-2004 17:46 GMT by mui freak37 comments
View flat
View list
Hi,
we all know that the pre-release of OS4 is shipped with a plain 68k version of MUI 3.9. Now, I'm interested if it would be possible to install this version on a classic Amiga? Will it work? Or is there some hacky code to prevent it from being runned on a real Amiga? Please guys, let me know. This finally would be a way to have all those bug fixes from MUI 3.9 on our mc68k's. I'm not interested in OS4, but I would buy the pre-relase just for this MUI 3.9 if it runs on my A4000 properly....
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous16-Jul-2004 15:55 GMT
Comment 2Zerohero16-Jul-2004 16:52 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous16-Jul-2004 17:48 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous16-Jul-2004 18:23 GMT
Comment 5mark16-Jul-2004 19:01 GMT
Comment 6Richi16-Jul-2004 19:36 GMT
Comment 7koan16-Jul-2004 20:20 GMT
Comment 8Amon_ReRegistered user16-Jul-2004 20:41 GMT
MUI 3.9 for 68k : Comment 9 of 37ANN.lu
Posted by XraalE on 16-Jul-2004 20:46 GMT
Most of the additions of MUI 3.9 are cosmetic anyway. Some need quite a lot of CPU too, and that might tax even UAE, which isn't fast as MOS (or as fast as OS4 *should* be).
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 10itix16-Jul-2004 21:19 GMT
Comment 11smithy16-Jul-2004 21:43 GMT
Comment 12James Carroll16-Jul-2004 23:06 GMT
Comment 13Richi17-Jul-2004 05:55 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous17-Jul-2004 06:52 GMT
Comment 15Richi17-Jul-2004 07:43 GMT
Comment 16insider17-Jul-2004 07:46 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:33 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:35 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:36 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:40 GMT
Comment 21Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 08:40 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous17-Jul-2004 08:41 GMT
Comment 23Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 08:42 GMT
Comment 24Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 09:01 GMT
Comment 25itix17-Jul-2004 09:12 GMT
Comment 26koan17-Jul-2004 14:22 GMT
Comment 27koan17-Jul-2004 14:24 GMT
Comment 28Emeric SH17-Jul-2004 15:32 GMT
Comment 29Richi17-Jul-2004 16:13 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous17-Jul-2004 16:32 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous18-Jul-2004 06:20 GMT
Comment 32Don CoxRegistered user18-Jul-2004 08:29 GMT
Comment 33koan18-Jul-2004 11:34 GMT
Comment 34Richi18-Jul-2004 16:02 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous18-Jul-2004 17:10 GMT
Comment 36Richi18-Jul-2004 19:09 GMT
Comment 37koan19-Jul-2004 07:11 GMT
Back to Top