27-Apr-2024 16:49 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] Any NEW amigaONE Linux Kernel?ANN.lu
Posted on 11-Aug-2004 09:26 GMT by SpawnPPC55 comments
View flat
View list
Any news about a new AmigaONE Linux Kernel, with DMA and 3D support for ATI RADEON cards?
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1JoannaK11-Aug-2004 08:48 GMT
Comment 2Thomas Würgler/PaganRegistered user11-Aug-2004 09:02 GMT
Comment 3Don CoxRegistered user11-Aug-2004 09:11 GMT
Comment 4ikirRegistered user11-Aug-2004 09:27 GMT
Comment 5koan11-Aug-2004 11:05 GMT
Comment 6Bernie MeyerRegistered user11-Aug-2004 11:45 GMT
Comment 7Bernie MeyerRegistered user11-Aug-2004 11:55 GMT
Comment 8Don CoxRegistered user11-Aug-2004 12:57 GMT
Comment 9Thomas Würgler/PaganRegistered user11-Aug-2004 12:59 GMT
Comment 10Olegil11-Aug-2004 13:18 GMT
Any NEW amigaONE Linux Kernel? : Comment 11 of 55ANN.lu
Posted by NoBeForMe on 11-Aug-2004 14:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (Bernie Meyer):
No need to paraphrase, here's a direct quote from a Hyperion employee

"we won't waste our time fixing the Linux Driver"

Just in case anyone isn't yet familiar with the history in this area....

During Autumn 2002 rumours circulated of problems with the Teron/A1 hardware, and also with the Pegasos, being built on the same Articia S Northbridge. These claims were dismissed by Eyetech and Hyperion who had conducted extensive tests and completely validated the A1 hardware.

In early December 2002 the story was now that the Teron/A1 used a buggy VIA southbridge and the OS4 IDE DMA driver included a suitable workaround for the problem, as did the Linux drivers. There were no problems with the Articia S, and Eyetech had done extensive tests to prove that.

A week or two later, just after Christmas the new story was that early Articia S chips were buggy, and Eyetech knew that it could be fixed in software, but instead they had a hardware fix to tide them over until MAI shipped the next, fixed revision.

Then Eyetech announced that AmigaOne Earlybird hardware would definitely include the hardware fix from MAI, incorporated into the Articia S itself. The problem had been completely eliminated. Reports of problems continued regardless.

In August 2003 the VIA southbridge story was back. A patch to U-Boot and to the Linux Kernel was developed by Hyperion together with MAI which tinkered with the 686B settings, eliminating all problems and proving conclusively that VIA's southbridge had been solely to blame all along.

At the start of November the new patch had completely failed to fix the problem, and a new theory was offered. Now the story became that Hyperion had known all along of a powerful new feature in the Articia S chipset which reduced memory access latency. The Linux drivers don't cater for this feature, but MAI was working on a fix for it. Meanwhile Hyperion had of course written the DMA capable drivers for the AmigaOne (in OS4) properly all along.

Then by December 2003 the story became that no OS4 IDE DMA driver had been written, although one was now in progress. Initial reports said that this driver, like the one written in 2002 was working 100% reliably. The Linux drivers were no longer of interest to Hyperion, and no fixes would be forthcoming from them.

During Spring/summer 2004 an announcement was made that an OS4 IDE DMA driver did now exist, and was 100% reliable, but it couldn't be released for testing and would only be included in the final OS4.0

So basically at any time Eyetech and Hyperion might say nearly anything, but having changed their minds so many times I don't think even they know what the truth is, so it's probably best to steer clear altogether.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 12Thomas FriedenRegistered user11-Aug-2004 15:29 GMT
Comment 13Thomas FriedenRegistered user11-Aug-2004 15:35 GMT
Comment 14Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user11-Aug-2004 15:42 GMT
Comment 15Hans-Joerg Frieden11-Aug-2004 15:46 GMT
Comment 16Hans-Joerg Frieden11-Aug-2004 15:53 GMT
Comment 17Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user11-Aug-2004 15:56 GMT
Comment 18Don CoxRegistered user11-Aug-2004 16:24 GMT
Comment 19Darth_XRegistered user11-Aug-2004 17:09 GMT
Comment 20Ronald St-Maurice11-Aug-2004 17:13 GMT
Comment 21Eva11-Aug-2004 17:47 GMT
Comment 22pixie11-Aug-2004 19:50 GMT
Comment 23Johan11-Aug-2004 19:59 GMT
Comment 24JoannaK11-Aug-2004 20:16 GMT
Comment 25brotheris11-Aug-2004 20:17 GMT
Comment 26Don CoxRegistered user11-Aug-2004 20:38 GMT
Comment 27Don CoxRegistered user11-Aug-2004 20:41 GMT
Comment 28Bernie MeyerRegistered user11-Aug-2004 21:24 GMT
Comment 29Bernie MeyerRegistered user11-Aug-2004 21:46 GMT
Comment 30Bernie MeyerRegistered user11-Aug-2004 21:50 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous11-Aug-2004 23:45 GMT
Comment 32NoBeForMe12-Aug-2004 00:06 GMT
Comment 33Don CoxRegistered user12-Aug-2004 06:25 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous12-Aug-2004 09:38 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous12-Aug-2004 09:45 GMT
Comment 36ehaines12-Aug-2004 11:51 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous12-Aug-2004 12:58 GMT
Comment 38ehaines12-Aug-2004 18:24 GMT
Comment 39Eva13-Aug-2004 03:58 GMT
Comment 40Don CoxRegistered user13-Aug-2004 06:53 GMT
Comment 41pixie13-Aug-2004 09:11 GMT
Comment 42Eva13-Aug-2004 10:30 GMT
Comment 43pixie13-Aug-2004 11:22 GMT
Comment 44Stefan Burström13-Aug-2004 13:22 GMT
Comment 45Davy13-Aug-2004 14:05 GMT
Comment 46Don CoxRegistered user13-Aug-2004 14:40 GMT
Comment 47NoBeForMe13-Aug-2004 16:50 GMT
Comment 48NoBeForMe13-Aug-2004 16:53 GMT
Comment 49NoBeForMe13-Aug-2004 17:15 GMT
Comment 50Davy13-Aug-2004 17:37 GMT
Comment 51brotheris13-Aug-2004 21:57 GMT
Comment 52Anonymous14-Aug-2004 12:37 GMT
Comment 53brotheris15-Aug-2004 08:33 GMT
Comment 54Anonymous15-Aug-2004 10:13 GMT
Comment 55Stéphane Guillard27-Aug-2004 10:43 GMT
Back to Top