[Forum] Interesting thread on Amiga.org | ANN.lu |
Posted on 06-Sep-2004 14:12 GMT by Anonymous (Edited on 2004-09-06 19:48:28 GMT by Christian Kemp) | 382 comments View flat View list |
Due to censorship by Argo the thread is locked but it is interesting to see a major Anti Amiga Inc webmaster turn in to a Genesi attacker and a certain website defender.
Amiga.org thread
Discuss
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Interesting thread on Amiga.org : Comment 328 of 382 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Sammy Nordström on 09-Sep-2004 09:18 GMT | In reply to Comment 318 (Bernie Meyer): >So if, during ongoing litigation, one company decides to sell an asset that,
>according to the other party in the litigation, is subject of the litigation
>--- would you expect the other party to know about it?
Did I mention anything about selling assets? What has selling assets go to do with changing CEO?
>So why do you consider it so unusual for Bill Buck to phone this new CEO (who,
>after all, handed out business cards with his phone number on them), and to
>talk to the guy to find out who he is now dealing with?
Because even if you plan to settle, it would have to go through legal counsel. Talking to your legal opponent directly is a huge risk. "Anything you say can and will be used against you", remember?
Besides, the motive to "just shut Bill McEwan up" tells me alot about the character of the individual at hand and what he is prepared to do solely for the sake of a personal grudge.
>How do you supposed BB should have verified the veracity of the business card?
Again, there was an ongoing litigation and it should just be a matter of asking his lawyer to contact Amiga Inc.'s lawyer then go from there. They would have to do that if they were planning to settle anyway, right?
>And last but not least --- why *should* BB have felt the need to verify that
>the guy who says he is AI CEO, acts as if he is AI CEO, was known to associate
>with the majority stakeholder in AI, and was named by AI itself in their court
>filings as someone who knew much about what's going on, is indeed the CEO?
Because his company was in litigation with AI and because AI had not made a change of CEO known, neither in court nor in public? |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|