28-May-2020 18:15 GMT.
[Files] ReactionChat releaseANN.lu
Posted on 09-Sep-2004 19:09 GMT by James Carroll25 comments
View flat
View list
I have just released a small reaction based IRC client for AmigaOS 3.x on my site. ReactionChat I started making an IRC client about a year or two ago. It was going to be based on Reaction, but I had problems with it.. clipboard support in the listbrowser class was a bit lacking.. when new text would appear in channel, the listbrowser would display it and bring that bottom new text into view - which makes it impossible to read the scrollback buffer in a busy channel, I couldnt figure out how to do nick completion with the string gadget class, and a few other things like that..... I'm still learning to program, so maybe these problems could have been worked around.. I'm not sure. But anyway, for those reasons I decided to switch to MUI. Well, this client has eventually become WookieChat .. it still needs a lot of work, but we're getting there slowly. Anyway, I've put the early Reaction version of my client online now. You can grab it from http://wookiechat.amigarevolution.com/rchat.exe . Raise the stack high before you run it. Some people like Reaction/Classact alternatives to MUI software. Well, ReactionChat is even more primitive and possibly more unstable than WookieChat, but its there for people to try out. As usual, its noncrippled shareware, but theres an option on the site to make small donations. Fanks.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Gregg09-Sep-2004 17:18 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous09-Sep-2004 17:25 GMT
Comment 3Don CoxRegistered user09-Sep-2004 17:29 GMT
Comment 4James Carroll09-Sep-2004 17:34 GMT
Comment 5James Carroll09-Sep-2004 17:36 GMT
Comment 6Gregg09-Sep-2004 17:47 GMT
Comment 7Gregg09-Sep-2004 17:50 GMT
Comment 8Gregg09-Sep-2004 17:50 GMT
Comment 9Don CoxRegistered user09-Sep-2004 17:51 GMT
Comment 10James Carroll09-Sep-2004 17:52 GMT
Comment 11Gregg09-Sep-2004 17:56 GMT
Comment 12James Carroll09-Sep-2004 17:59 GMT
Comment 13James Carroll09-Sep-2004 18:08 GMT
Comment 14Big blueass troll09-Sep-2004 21:43 GMT
Comment 15DarrinRegistered user10-Sep-2004 01:52 GMT
Comment 16James Carroll10-Sep-2004 03:01 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous10-Sep-2004 06:36 GMT
Comment 18Leo10-Sep-2004 11:49 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous10-Sep-2004 13:35 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous10-Sep-2004 13:38 GMT
Comment 21NekoRegistered user10-Sep-2004 14:54 GMT
ReactionChat release : Comment 22 of 25ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 11-Sep-2004 09:02 GMT
In reply to Comment 6 (Gregg):
> Because Amiga executables do not need .exe suffix

You better stop beeing a smart ass Amiga user because that's an unsustainable argument: Amiga libraries don't need the .library suffix and yet they have it ;) So do many other files on Amiga computers. If files don't have an icon, the suffix is a great way to find out what kind of file it is: is it *.lha or *.lzx or *.iff or a .font or ... If there are twenty files and none has an .exe(cutable) suffix, how am I supposed to find the executable? Doubleclick on each file? The fact that some AmigaOS files have a suffix and some files do not is not an indication of the greatness of AmigaOS, it's a sign of how half-baked AmigaOS is in some regards.

> And if you make icon for the application which has .exe suffix in it's name, then icon name must also include that .exe suffix. And that looks awful.

Yes, good point, but you have the same problem with a lot of files. guides that end on *.guide, text files that end on *.rtf etc. The solution is to use a file requesters that hides *.info files.
#24 Gregg
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 23Marcin 'Morgoth' Kurek11-Sep-2004 12:09 GMT
Comment 24Gregg13-Sep-2004 16:25 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous16-Sep-2004 22:18 GMT
Back to Top