24-Apr-2024 19:30 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] A big step forward in cross-platform computingANN.lu
Posted on 15-Sep-2004 22:32 GMT by Gary Goldberg39 comments
View flat
View list
By Leander Kahney 02:00 AM Sep. 13, 2004 PT A Silicon Valley startup claims to have cracked one of most elusive goals of the software industry: a near-universal emulator that allows software developed for one platform to run on any other, with almost no performance hit. Transitive Corp. of Los Gatos, California, claims its QuickTransit software allows applications to run "transparently" on multiple hardware platforms, including Macs, PCs, and numerous servers and mainframes... http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,64914,00.html?tw=wn_6techhead
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Lando15-Sep-2004 23:18 GMT
Comment 2Andrew Korn15-Sep-2004 23:27 GMT
Comment 3Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Sep-2004 01:11 GMT
Comment 4Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Sep-2004 01:18 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous16-Sep-2004 01:46 GMT
Comment 6AMC25816-Sep-2004 03:17 GMT
Comment 7Chris Perver16-Sep-2004 05:50 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous16-Sep-2004 06:16 GMT
Comment 9bennymee16-Sep-2004 06:28 GMT
Comment 10Don CoxRegistered user16-Sep-2004 09:38 GMT
Comment 11miksuh16-Sep-2004 12:04 GMT
Comment 12Don CoxRegistered user16-Sep-2004 13:43 GMT
Comment 13Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 13:45 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous16-Sep-2004 14:41 GMT
Comment 15miksuh16-Sep-2004 14:44 GMT
Comment 16sutro16-Sep-2004 17:06 GMT
Comment 17Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 17:57 GMT
Comment 18Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 18:00 GMT
Comment 19sutro16-Sep-2004 18:55 GMT
Comment 20Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user16-Sep-2004 20:41 GMT
Comment 21Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Sep-2004 23:39 GMT
Comment 22JoannaK17-Sep-2004 02:40 GMT
Comment 23Johan "Hagge" Krüger-Haglert17-Sep-2004 04:35 GMT
Comment 24sutro17-Sep-2004 13:32 GMT
Comment 25Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Sep-2004 14:06 GMT
Comment 26Kolbjørn Barmen18-Sep-2004 11:03 GMT
Comment 27Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user18-Sep-2004 14:31 GMT
Comment 283seas19-Sep-2004 15:42 GMT
A big step forward in cross-platform computing : Comment 29 of 39ANN.lu
Posted by noggin on 20-Sep-2004 08:51 GMT
I'm not sure if people actually realise this, but Tao's VM technology is Java. It's a small+fast implementation of the virtual machine, and AFAIK nothing more than that. I'm less clear on AmigaDE, I guess it is either a re-badge with the Amiga name (fair enough), or chucks some game-related API's on top of Tao's Java VM. If they do add API's, they are completely redundant IMO. J2ME (Java 2 Micro Edition) already has perfectly good, standard API's to deal with game stuff already (MIDP, CLDC, MMAPI, JSR-184).

BTW, there are are also more languages that run on the Java VM than there probably ever will on .Net (if your really interested, I'll find you a link to IIRC, hundreds). They are not officially supported by Sun of course, so if you want an officially supported non-Java language VM then just go with MS.

I don't quite understand the point in arguing .Net against Java here, and I certainly don't see .Net as a "better" technology. It's just different. You either you throw your lot in with Sun or with Microsoft. I know what I continually choose based on (1) track record, (2) the relative open-ness of the tech, and (3) being a proven solution. But that is not really the point. The likelihood is that nobody will "win", so there is no point arguing about it until there are independent and fair assessments of the two technologies in *real environments*. This is something we have not seen yet since the only studies so far have been clouded by dodgy back-handers from both sides (some more public than others).

Ultimately, it's too early to tell for .Net - give it a few more years.

For enterprise-level business, and for the mobile phone industry, development using VM-like environments is almost completely Java. That may indeed change over time. It will certainly be interesting to see what pans out.
Jump...
#30 3seas #32 Don Cox
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 303seas20-Sep-2004 10:09 GMT
Comment 31noggin20-Sep-2004 10:32 GMT
Comment 32Don CoxRegistered user20-Sep-2004 14:10 GMT
Comment 33Don CoxRegistered user20-Sep-2004 14:14 GMT
Comment 34Ben Hern20-Sep-2004 17:39 GMT
Comment 35MarkTime20-Sep-2004 18:25 GMT
Comment 36noggin21-Sep-2004 05:28 GMT
Comment 37noggin21-Sep-2004 05:35 GMT
Comment 38Joe "Floid" Kanowitz21-Sep-2004 08:11 GMT
Comment 39Joe "Floid" Kanowitz21-Sep-2004 08:24 GMT
Back to Top