26-Apr-2024 17:14 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] Freescale donates 10 PegasosPPC machines to Gentoo developersANN.lu
Posted on 11-Oct-2004 10:58 GMT by MrZammler24 comments
View flat
View list
Check this out: http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20041011-newsletter.xml#doc_chap1.

While they mention that MOS is pre-installed there, I'm assuming they'll not be concentrating their efforts on MOS stuff. (that's to be expected of course from a linux distro). So, while it is nice that Amiga-ish hardware finds it's way to people outside of the community, do you think that this is of any good for the Amiga platform in general? Or is it a sign that Amiga-like OSes just doesnt cut it for the 21st century?
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Freescale donates 10 PegasosPPC machines to Gentoo developers : Comment 1 of 24ANN.lu
Posted by AdmV on 11-Oct-2004 09:15 GMT
How does an Amiga OS fit in today's situation?

When released, Amiga OS as far as I understand was built formost as a gaming machine/OS - including the custom equipment for the sound ,GFX, and thus it fitted very nicely into Multimedia which due to the display being a TV fitted into an explosive market.

Today, Amiga OS lives on retro-capabilities. It plays old games, and old apps, or updated apps. You can I guess apply that to MOS or AROS, Amithlon and UAE.

If amiga OS is to have some kind of future, I would suggest this and only from my personal view.

1. An OS that is nice for the user.
2. A stable OS.
3. Development tools and API's that allow applications and games, network tools and other areas to be developed.
4. A modern look and feel.
5. An OS that is as open as possible.

Right now, I am not sure Amiga OS even is capable of matching what is on offer in any of the mainstream OS's. Its capabilities have been around for a long time and its lacking in rather a lot of areas, as you would expect for an oldish OS. To bring people back into this OS would require major changes, beyond people being fond of it.
Jump...
#2 Thomas Würgler/Pagan #6 Anonymous
TopNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 2Thomas Würgler/PaganRegistered user11-Oct-2004 10:30 GMT
Comment 3AdmV11-Oct-2004 10:53 GMT
Comment 4magnetic11-Oct-2004 11:38 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous11-Oct-2004 12:23 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous11-Oct-2004 13:20 GMT
Comment 7Ronald St-Maurice11-Oct-2004 13:57 GMT
Comment 8cheesegrate11-Oct-2004 13:58 GMT
Comment 9Ronald St-Maurice11-Oct-2004 13:58 GMT
Comment 10AdmV11-Oct-2004 14:37 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous11-Oct-2004 15:24 GMT
Comment 12Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user11-Oct-2004 15:28 GMT
Comment 13Kolbjørn Barmen11-Oct-2004 15:57 GMT
Comment 14Abuse11-Oct-2004 16:04 GMT
Comment 15Damien11-Oct-2004 16:13 GMT
Comment 16thefab11-Oct-2004 17:26 GMT
Comment 17coldfire11-Oct-2004 18:17 GMT
Comment 18Abuse11-Oct-2004 18:45 GMT
Comment 19coldfire11-Oct-2004 19:17 GMT
Comment 20Bla_head11-Oct-2004 20:24 GMT
Comment 21cdecanini11-Oct-2004 20:40 GMT
Comment 22Christophe DecaniniRegistered user11-Oct-2004 20:50 GMT
Comment 23Olegil12-Oct-2004 10:06 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous12-Oct-2004 11:03 GMT
Back to Top