25-Apr-2024 04:29 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] KMOS mailing addressANN.lu
Posted on 14-Oct-2004 05:18 GMT by Jubal H30 comments
View flat
View list
Does anyone have a valid mailing address for KMOS? I have some legal documents I'm trying to get through to them and the address supplied to me appears to be very old, as the post office returns the mail stamped "Wrong Address" and no new address has been left.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous14-Oct-2004 05:01 GMT
Comment 2gary_c14-Oct-2004 05:28 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous14-Oct-2004 05:49 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous14-Oct-2004 05:52 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous14-Oct-2004 06:08 GMT
Comment 6gary_c14-Oct-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 7gary_c14-Oct-2004 06:17 GMT
Comment 8Jubal14-Oct-2004 06:52 GMT
Comment 9John Block14-Oct-2004 11:43 GMT
Comment 10kalmar14-Oct-2004 11:55 GMT
Comment 11Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2004 14:05 GMT
Comment 12Janne14-Oct-2004 14:17 GMT
Comment 13Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user14-Oct-2004 15:07 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous14-Oct-2004 15:16 GMT
Comment 15Jon Mines14-Oct-2004 16:31 GMT
Comment 16Jon Mines14-Oct-2004 16:38 GMT
KMOS mailing address : Comment 17 of 30ANN.lu
Posted by Jubal on 14-Oct-2004 19:47 GMT
In reply to Comment 11 (Don Cox):
> You are. What makes you think KMOS has a external office? If Garry Hare has any sense, he will be working from home.

If so, if he had any sense, he'd have a PO BOX. That would be fine. Anyway, I'm not looking for Garry Hare's contact info, I'm looking for "KMOS INC's" contact info. The whole reason you incorporate is to provide a distinction between the two. If he feels comfortable using the same postal address for both individual legal entities, then that's the address I'd need, but that's specifically not what I'm looking for.

> And why would he want to receive these "legal papers"?

How can you reasonably expect to do business if you can't recieve legal papers? Why would you want to hide the address of an incorporated company anyway? It's a separate legal entity. No matter what the papers contain, they are addressed to the legal entity "KMOS", NOT "Garry Hare"... if Garry Hare were obstructing the legal entity "KMOS" from being reached, then the incorporation no longer protects him, as he is obstructing due process between a party and an incorporation. That could be big trouble for him, even though the contents of said papers are rather docile. That just doesn't make much sense, and I don't know why anyone would take that unnecessary risk, so I can only conclude that any reasonably intelligent person would not attempt to possibly incriminate himself in this way.
Jump...
#19 Anonymous #20 Don Cox
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 18Jubal14-Oct-2004 19:52 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous15-Oct-2004 18:36 GMT
Comment 20Don CoxRegistered user16-Oct-2004 06:11 GMT
Comment 21Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user17-Oct-2004 10:36 GMT
Comment 22ppprimemover17-Oct-2004 17:06 GMT
Comment 23John Block17-Oct-2004 19:57 GMT
Comment 24gary_c18-Oct-2004 01:45 GMT
Comment 25ppprimemover18-Oct-2004 04:54 GMT
Comment 26John Block18-Oct-2004 07:01 GMT
Comment 27Seargent Friday18-Oct-2004 19:06 GMT
Comment 28Cybes20-Oct-2004 13:11 GMT
Comment 29John Block20-Oct-2004 18:49 GMT
Comment 30John Block20-Oct-2004 18:54 GMT
Back to Top