19-Mar-2024 11:27 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Pictures of the MicroA1 "Industrial" motherboardANN.lu
Posted on 17-Oct-2004 12:25 GMT by Not ArticiaP69 comments
View flat
View list
On this link you will see three pictures of the MicroA1 "Industrial" motherboard: http://lain.ziaspace.com/~ryu/a1. On the pictures you can see that it still uses the ArticiaS northbridge, as well as the VIA 686B southbridge, but a standalone Sil0680 IDE controller is there as well.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Neil Thomas17-Oct-2004 11:25 GMT
Comment 2Adam Kowalczyk17-Oct-2004 12:15 GMT
Comment 3Joe17-Oct-2004 12:28 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous17-Oct-2004 13:22 GMT
Comment 5ikirRegistered user17-Oct-2004 13:23 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous17-Oct-2004 13:54 GMT
Comment 7Zylesea17-Oct-2004 14:55 GMT
Pictures of the MicroA1 "Industrial" motherboard : Comment 8 of 69ANN.lu
Posted by Neil Thomas on 17-Oct-2004 15:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (Zylesea):
Becasue in the real world designs take time to configure and get working correctly, it takes a great deal of cash and time inuptus to get upto, let alone beyond the cuttinr edge curve. It's easy for you to suggest specs of components that you want, but it is not so easy to implement (not just from a technical point of view). Budgets, supply of components, CAD time & software development time, these are all valid answers to your questions. Other products start the developement lifecycle from different positions so are closer or further away from the development curve. That's life and the balance of economics. Engineering isn't about getting the best, it's a compromise between what is possible, and what is necessary. And it all has a price.

Neil Thomas, AKA MiniBobF
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 9Anonymous17-Oct-2004 16:06 GMT
Comment 10Undercover17-Oct-2004 17:25 GMT
Comment 11Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user17-Oct-2004 17:35 GMT
Comment 12Adam Kowalczyk17-Oct-2004 20:18 GMT
Comment 13JoannaK17-Oct-2004 20:55 GMT
Comment 14NekoRegistered user17-Oct-2004 21:51 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous17-Oct-2004 23:28 GMT
Comment 16Adam Kowalczyk18-Oct-2004 00:57 GMT
Comment 17Adam Kowalczyk18-Oct-2004 00:58 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous18-Oct-2004 05:15 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:16 GMT
Comment 20Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:29 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:31 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:35 GMT
Comment 23kalmar18-Oct-2004 06:38 GMT
Comment 24JoannaK18-Oct-2004 06:44 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous18-Oct-2004 06:45 GMT
Comment 26zylesea18-Oct-2004 06:49 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous18-Oct-2004 07:01 GMT
Comment 28Adam Kowalczyk18-Oct-2004 11:30 GMT
Comment 29Johan Rönnblom18-Oct-2004 13:31 GMT
Comment 30JoannaK18-Oct-2004 13:46 GMT
Comment 31Total Quality Experience18-Oct-2004 15:44 GMT
Comment 32Andreas Wolf18-Oct-2004 17:52 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous19-Oct-2004 00:19 GMT
Comment 34priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 04:09 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous19-Oct-2004 04:39 GMT
Comment 36priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 05:15 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous19-Oct-2004 06:21 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous19-Oct-2004 06:29 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:03 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:09 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:12 GMT
Comment 42priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 07:19 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:33 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:34 GMT
Comment 45priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 07:34 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:51 GMT
Comment 47Anonymous19-Oct-2004 07:53 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous19-Oct-2004 08:07 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous19-Oct-2004 08:42 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous19-Oct-2004 10:20 GMT
Comment 51Johan Rönnblom19-Oct-2004 10:43 GMT
Comment 52Don CoxRegistered user19-Oct-2004 10:48 GMT
Comment 53priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 11:11 GMT
Comment 54JoannaK19-Oct-2004 11:29 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous19-Oct-2004 13:22 GMT
Comment 56priestRegistered user19-Oct-2004 18:44 GMT
Comment 57JoannaK19-Oct-2004 20:21 GMT
Comment 58Anonymous20-Oct-2004 05:55 GMT
Comment 59priestRegistered user20-Oct-2004 12:58 GMT
Comment 60priestRegistered user20-Oct-2004 13:01 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous21-Oct-2004 05:25 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous21-Oct-2004 12:35 GMT
Comment 63Adam Kowalczyk21-Oct-2004 20:15 GMT
Comment 64takemehomegrandmaRegistered user22-Oct-2004 07:59 GMT
Comment 65Anonymous22-Oct-2004 09:14 GMT
Comment 66Adam Kowalczyk22-Oct-2004 10:10 GMT
Comment 67Agima22-Oct-2004 16:43 GMT
Comment 68Anonymous23-Oct-2004 16:37 GMT
Comment 69Adam Kowalczyk23-Oct-2004 16:58 GMT
Back to Top