23-Apr-2024 13:11 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 233 items in your selection (but only 83 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 233]
[Forum] "party on:-)" (R.S.)ANN.lu
Posted on 02-Oct-2001 19:56 GMT by Martin Heine233 comments
View flat
View list
(Before someone again complains that I'm sharing my opinion "everywhere": I just decided to paste here what I wrote in comp.sys.amiga.misc because of Christian's call for articles.)
The article contains quick and dirty translations of comments made yesterday and today by Mr. Haage and Ralph Schmidt at amiga-news.de, since I thought non-german-speakers might be interested in this, too. Newsgroup-article #1:


To try to compensate at least a little bit the advantages of those Amigans who speak German (and therefore often get easier to rumours, facts, etc., because of the importance of german companies and individuals for the Amiga-market), I thought it might be useful to translate a few statements made at amiga-news.de today.

While Eyetech and H&P accuse each other for the A1/AOS4-delays (one says the hardware is missing, one says the OS4 is missing), Mr. Haage made (among others) the following comments (no warranty for the translation!):


[Mr. Haage (H) comments some rumours (R)]

H: "The interest in OS4.0 we have NEVER lost. But we've never been and are not convinced of the profitability of the project if the concepts won't be changed."

R: "They (H&P) are just the executing organ, all decisions are made by Amiga Inc."

H: "Correct. [...]"

R: "Amiga Inc. displays regarding Communication with their partners "certain" deficits."

H: "Deficits is nicely said. But it's correct!"

R: "Failing to come / insufficient payments from Amiga Inc."

H: "Before payments could be made, contracts have to be made. That far, however, we aren't yet. Regarding which I clearly want to emphasize that WE do not delay."

[...]

H: "To be able to be partners to an agreement, one needs contracts - and that is not Amiga Inc.'s strong point."


[Another comment from Mr. Haage]

R: "Is the date told by Alan Redhouse [Eyetech] for the completion of OS4.0 ("november, but probably not the 1st") possible in your opinion?"

H: "Only if it would be right now possible to work towards that date. But the conditions for this don't exist. Maybe a wonder happens, but I don't expect it."


No wonder that those like me, who've been suspicious regarding AI in favour of MorphOS/Pegasos for some time already, unfortunately feel confirmed more and more. Also no wonder that Ralph Schmidt is enjoying this soap opera from AI, H&P and Eyetech, his first comment has been the one quoted as the subject: "party on:-)".


So, after translating Mr. Haage's point of view, I'll also think I should quote from one of Ralph's comments, too. He (RS) answers to a comment by Mr. Haage (JH):

JH: "In an exclusive x86 AmigaOS version we aren't interested."

RS: "No? :-) Do you think we don't get what you proposed internally already in August? :-)"

[...]

RS: "As you've been also told already by a person from Amiga Inc. some monthes ago... you have no future as Amiga OS vendor."


My personal guess is that the main problem seems to be Amiga Inc., i.e. especially their lack of money. So after them already given up on their plans regarding DE being their future OS many monthes ago, it seems their plan to survive as a content vendor for PDAs seems to be not that successful, too (Alan Redhouse, too, does confirm in his statement that AI still has the already known financial problems). If companies like H&P do speak that way about AI already in the public as Mr. Haage did today at amiga-news.de (I just translated a little bit of it), I exprect the worst regarding AI's future.

Therefore it really seems the Amiga-market's future might be just those two ones Ralph outlined: an emulation-based x86 one by H&P and the PPC one covered by MorphOS.



-----8<--------

Newsgroup-article #2:

Some "second helping" - the "party" goes on:

(Again no warranty for the 'quick and dirty' translation.)


Michael Garlich (Titan Computer) in reply to Mr. Haage:

"You should restrain yourself on your statements against Mr. Schmidt! Only you are to blame for the current situation - if you had actually shown your much propagated readiness for cooperation last year in september, it would not have been come that far. Despite all adverse things Mr. Schmidt contrary to you had been willing to cooperate under leadership of Amiga Inc. !!!"


And another reply by Ralph to Mr. Haage:

"[...] You operate on other levels which the normal user doesn't notice. (dealers, influence on Amiga Inc., threats with licences, internal mailing lists, influence on a certain person and a certain company)"



-----8<--------

Newsgroup-article #3:

I think balance requires me to continue the translation at least one more time, i.e. especially regarding the repeated offer below by Mr. Haage to try to come to a cooperation. Of course everyone draws his own conclusions, H&P-fans may say "didn't I tell you, just Ralph is the bad guy" (although there's on the other hand the, today repeated, version by for example Mr. Garlich who said that Mr. Haage would have prevented exactly this last year), while the other side may say he's just lying or trying another trick. My personal conclusion is that Mr. Haage may just get cold feet because of the apparently very bad financial situation at AI and its consequences for another Amiga-PPC-future besides MorphOS.

Well, here again some quick and dirty translations from the very same thread of comments at amiga-news.de as before; again, no warranty.


1. Mr. Haage:

He suggests to accept an invitation made partly humorously by amiga-news.de's Petra Struck to Mr. Haage and Ralph to meet at her home for a dinner and try to come to an agreement.

(But Ralph did already say in a comment before he'd never again cooperate with Mr. Haage, because of the well-known history and because H&P would just have nothing to offer that would be of interest for the bplan/Morphos-crew. (Although I think Ralph underestimates the value of "the name", but on the other hand I don't know how much, if any, influence H&P has regarding this.))


2. Ralph:

(It has been said before that by saying H&P (and Hyperion) would have nothing to offer the MorphOS-team could be interested in, they would cut out "StormC4, Arteffect, Genesis, Olsen's TCP/IP Stack, OS 3.9 licences" and Hyperion's products.)

" 1) We have with the PPC-MorphOS-GCC our own development system, [...].
2) I wouldn't know what's that unique with ArtEffect. [...]
3) Genesis is a GUI surface and the TCP/IP stack belongs to Tomi Ollila, which we do also have as a PPC version.
4) Olsen's TCP/IP stack is controlled by Olsen and nobody else. And we do have a *very* good relationship with Olaf.
5) Amiga users do already own 3.1, 3.5 or 3.9 and it's left up to them of they continue to use it until a completely new WB exists.
6) MorphOS as AmigaOS 4.x was massively opposed by Hyperion since november 2000 and in summer it was said that they'd never would be porting Warp3d to MorphOS, when Amiga Inc. suggested them this. This decision is left up to them for what they want to develop something... The consequence is just that they don't play any role in our plans. Therefore we plan an own 3D solution. Warp3d is only that long important as new games support it.
[...]
9) As I said already... H&P are free to offer their applications for MorphOS also. *We* won't hinder anyone from developing applications for MorphOS. SDKs from us always will be free.
10) With Papyrus we'll have a real office-package with word-processor."


3. Mr. Haage:

Replying to the comment by Mr. Garlich (see earlier in this thread), Mr. Haage says he wouldn't know about what Mr. Garlich would be speaking.


4. Ralph:

(He was asked if Nova Design or Paul Nolan would have announced support for MorphOS already.)

"We have also spoken with Kermit Woodal several times. Since he's also closely related with Merlancia, there are certainly possibilities. :-) Paul Nolan does have a key and a development system since last year... [...]"
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 151 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by adam ceremuga on 06-Oct-2001 11:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 147 (Ralph Schmidt):
Ralph

i'm fully aware you are part of Bplan. Since it is common knowledge merlancia
is going to use your motherboards i included them together.

> When the OS matured we will also target other HW
>like Macs which was also said several times before.
>Please try to inform yourself a little bit before
>you draw your conflusions:-)

Yeah o.k ralph but were i was leading with my questions was you finding common ground (?) between yourself and amiga inc. And a commitment of morphos being avaible for Amiga One eventually would be needed. 'OS Matured' is a very vague term, it could mean two years ralph :) your product is superiour to the amiga one so porting morphos would not harm the bplan imho
Again: when do u expect the Bplan to be on sale so MorphOS development can lead to morph running on other ppc motherboards?

> AInc is not able to lead and control an OS project.
> I don`t say this out of bad will but that`s
> mine, other OS developers and also Mr. Haage
> opinion.

Well Mr Haage did not say that but rather it seemed a sense of frustration that Amiga Inc were short of cash and therefore certain decitions could not be made.
While i'm sure your comment has vadility, it sounds like you believe that the actual people at amiga inc are an incompetent bunch of fools.
is that what you think?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 152 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 06-Oct-2001 12:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 151 (adam ceremuga):
>Yeah o.k ralph but were i was leading with my questions>was you finding common ground (?) between yourself and>amiga inc. And a commitment of morphos being avaible>for Amiga One eventually would be needed.Look..we have no real problem with it...our problemis that it was used to create a 4.0 hype againstour product with 2 virtual products.We just don`t *calculate* with it anymore..we haven`treally since last may.>'OS Matured' is a very vague term, it could mean two>years ralph :) your product is superiour to the amiga>one so porting morphos would not harm the bplan imhoLook..we have an alpha running on the morphos board,we still need some program & test time for the remainingOS modules to get a native rom. There is also remainingdriver work to do.>Again: when do u expect the Bplan to be on sale so>MorphOS development can lead to morph running on other>ppc motherboards?Q1 is planned for the boards to the end user.> AInc is not able to lead and control an OS project.> I don`t say this out of bad will but that`s> mine, other OS developers and also Mr. Haage> opinion.>Well Mr Haage did not say that but rather it seemed a sense>of frustration that Amiga Inc were short of cash and therefore>certain decitions could not be made.He did, if you read the whole comments he wrote on amiga-news.>While i'm sure your comment has vadility, it sounds like you>believe that the actual people at amiga inc are an incompetent>bunch of fools. is that what you think?Look..to develop, lead and control the AmigaOS developmentyou need certain abilities...o you must have the technology knowledge about the OS to decide the right plan....they don`t.o you must have the absolute will to execute the plan and if you can`t you must have the money to finance something you then later supervisor...they don`t. My comment about Hyperion above should have shown that they don`t even have enough power over their "official" partners...they couldn`t force them to do Warp3d for a MorphOS AmigaOS.o you must control the Amiga technology but they don't. 3.5 and 3.9 are controlled by H&P to my knowledge.o you must have the HW for your plans.A lot people think that they fail in all these 4 points.What you make out of this is up to you...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 153 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 06-Oct-2001 14:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 152 (Ralph Schmidt):
Ok, Ralphie boy...1. You know *nothing* about Amiga inc's finances. (You are not their auditor.)2. You know *nothing* about the competence of Amiga inc's employees.3. You know *nothing* about Amiga inc's partnerships. (The true details are only known by the partners themselves.)4. You know *nothing* about what's going on inside the walls at Amiga inc's office in Snowqualmie.You do *NOT* have the appropriate knowledge to judge Amiga inc's capabilities of running a OS development project, period.BTW: Your posts on this forum says alot about *your* competence of running a OS development project. Shut the f*** up and do something useful instead, these kind of wortless and time consuming arguments won't be a benefit to your MorphOS either.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 154 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by David Scheibler on 06-Oct-2001 14:55 GMT
In reply to Comment 153 (Samface):
But you do?

If you don't so why do you think Ralph doesn't know anything about
Amiga Inc? And are you saying H&P's statement about Amiga's competence
are wrong?

BTW: Interview with Bill McEwen in AmigaAktuell (international version
will follow soon): "AmigaDE is not a desktop-OS".
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 155 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Troels Ersking on 06-Oct-2001 15:26 GMT
In reply to Comment 154 (David Scheibler):
We have known for a long time that AmigaDE is not an desktop OS and will not be used as that, so where's the news in that?
Please notice that is not the same as saying that it can't be very usefull on desktops though.


""But you do?
If you don't so why do you think Ralph doesn't know anything about
Amiga Inc? And are you saying H&P's statement about Amiga's competence
are wrong?
BTW: Interview with Bill McEwen in AmigaAktuell (international version
will follow soon): "AmigaDE is not a desktop-OS". ""
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 156 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Troels Ersking on 06-Oct-2001 15:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 147 (Ralph Schmidt):
Is it normal for morphos(that is you RS.) to talk openly about contract proposals you get from other companies? I don't see other companies practice that kind off business.

Why not make a scan of it and make it totally public while you are at it. After all we are living in a "Bigbrother" world?

You just keep on amazing me with your ""I know better, cos I have secret sources of information"" attitude.

Your time must be divided into something like 20% developement on morpos and 80% throwing dirt at other companies, why not spend all the time on morphos and get it working properly instead?

Troels Ersking
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 157 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by David Scheibler on 06-Oct-2001 16:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 155 (Troels Ersking):
The news was not for the rest but for sammy (aka samface). Read his
comments on amiga.org and you will see that he believes that AmigaDE
will be a full desktop OS.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 158 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 06-Oct-2001 16:27 GMT
In reply to Comment 156 (Troels Ersking):
>Is it normal for morphos(that is you RS.) to talk openly about>contract proposals you get from other companies? I don't see>other companies practice that kind off business.I don`t disclose anything about the contract...but when H&P canblame them for no contract from Amiga Inc. I take the rightto say that we got one...weeks ago. We kept all quite about allthat for..let`s say..mid April to now..early October..almost6 months nobody outside had really a clue that MorphOS tried tocooperate with Amiga Inc...all this unfounded hatred against usby persons like Sammy we just took it because we gave Amiga Inc.the chance of a doubt there`s something possible with AInc.But it isn`t...at least nothing about them doing any projectmanagement or control.>Why not make a scan of it and make it totally public while you are at it.>After all we are living in a "Bigbrother" world?You don`t seem to have understood the situation....this isn`t about amiga inc.This here is about *YOU*...you..the people which wanna continue to usethe OS on modern HW. At the moment there`s nothing anymore about let`s playnice, calm, let's talk it out behind the scenes so nobody get hurt...allthat *happened* the whole summer long.It resulted into the current situation which is...AmigaXL/Amithlon for x86AROSMorphOS for PPCand AInc basicly dead silent...and nothing here about rethoric games..but you`re so unsymmpathic,arrogant or your favourite description of my personaly will changeanything about this.Now is the time for...do we all want the OS on modern HW and let's *try* tosave the amiga scene or forget it and continue waiting for vapor and thinkabout how great the past once was...10 years ago.>You just keep on amazing me with your>""I know better, cos I have secret sources of information"">attitude.I don`t really care if you like my attitude about this or not becausethis is not about me....this is about the amiga user, developerand dealer scene to survive.>Your time must be divided into something like 20% developement on morpos>and 80% throwing dirt at other companies, why not spend all the time on>morphos and get it working properly instead?Thanks for bothering for our product but i think this discussion nowis *IMPORTANT*...if not i wouldn't waste my time to write a word here.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 159 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Lennart Fridén on 06-Oct-2001 18:43 GMT
In reply to Comment 154 (David Scheibler):
Which is extremely old news and doesn't prove your point. I could be speaking about the pros and cons of a car and than say that a vulture is a bird (whih is true, but hasn't got anything to do with the car)...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 160 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Lennart Fridén on 06-Oct-2001 18:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 157 (David Scheibler):
>he believes that AmigaDE will be a full desktop OS.

No he doesn't. I believe me, I know him A LOT bettar than you do...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 161 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by David Scheibler on 06-Oct-2001 19:17 GMT
In reply to Comment 160 (Lennart Fridén):
Ah, then maybe you should learn him how to write comments in which you
actually say what you mean and think.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 162 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Smith Rouelle on 06-Oct-2001 19:18 GMT
In reply to Comment 149 (Mahen):
>I think you should definitely try to find an agreement with AInc. as you >obviously require each other. and b/c it seems that is the only possible >solution.

Amiga Inc need MorphOS because they have a product. MorphOS doesn't need Amiga Inc at all.

>Please, Ralph, act now.

Ralph would be jeopardising his product if he did that. Don't do it Ralph!

-Smithy
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 163 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 06-Oct-2001 20:30 GMT
In reply to Comment 161 (David Scheibler):
> Ah, then maybe you should learn him how to write comments in which you actually say
> what you mean and think.

Talk about having your foot and eating it too! Need the salt and pepper?

While we are on the subject of going completely WAY out of the scope of the comments listed here on ANN. For those who are interested, have a look at some of the comments made by our good friend David Scheibler (there are some interesting ones on the Vapor lists) in the news groups as well as the infamous Laire on some IRC sessions and mailing lists (AmigaOne ML particularly, couple of good laughs in there). I know many people believed the AmigaDE was going to be a full desktop OS and were quickly thwarted from that path by Francis Charig and backed by Bill McEwen.

I thinks I be educated enough so I must learn him how to write comments. Oh Sammy boy!!!

In Reply to Comment 146:

> Amiga doesn't have any distribution rights for selling Amithlon.

Will it require anything Amiga offers in order to run? I would think it does. Perhaps a ROM image by chance. Sell a few more of those for some extra cash possible. What about OS3.9. Granted it's a product of H&P but that doesn't mean it is only H&P who will profit from using the name AmigaOS3.9. Bill had a good reason to up play Amithlon as well as AmigaOS/XL now, he just couldn't talk about the QNX version as H&P hadn't agreed to release any information on it. Granted the profit for selling a rom image might be less than most think, but those numbers add up quick.

Come on David... you are smarter than that. Quit making stabs at the dark and focus. I would take pity on you if this was even close to being a real debatable topic.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 164 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by David Scheibler on 06-Oct-2001 20:55 GMT
In reply to Comment 163 (the man in the shadows):
So please explain me why Amiga doesn't distribute Amithlon as they
first wanted to do. Without the bundle of the two emulators the price
of one package could be around 200DEM instead of 300DEM and could be
sold much better. And if there had been another product from H&P: Who
cares? Amithlon had been the "real official emulator fully powered by
Amiga Inc.". And as people here say: Hey the Amiga brand, that's the
important thing! If Amiga releases OS4 then MorphOS will be dead. So
why not: If Amiga releases Amithlon then AmigaXL for QNX will be dead.
If Amiga had been the distributor they would make much more money than
they get now with some licences. So think about why Bill McEwen
announced "Amiga x86 aka Amithlon" to be released on Nov 1st but in
the end Bernd and Harald didn't choose Amiga Inc. but H&P.

There is a huge difference what Amiga Inc. want to do and what they
actually can do.

They announced first DE native devices for the end of May. Where are
these?
They made an announcement about Meternet's Simplebox running DE
natively, no more updates about that.
They made a deal with Sharp but actually in most press releases Amiga
isn't mentioned but TAO is. Guess why.
They made an announcement about the AmigaOne/OS4 to be released in
Q1/April/summer/November.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 165 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by anonymous on 06-Oct-2001 22:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (David Scheibler):
Because no progress was made with Amiga to sell the product, H&P is experienced in software distribution and has channels setup, and offered a realistic agreement, in a timely manner. Man in the Shadows (Amiga.org cheerleader) please find someone to interpret German for you.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 166 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 06-Oct-2001 23:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (David Scheibler):
> So please explain me why Amiga doesn't distribute Amithlon as they
> first wanted to do. Without the bundle of the two emulators the price
> of one package could be around 200DEM instead of 300DEM and could be
> sold much better.

Hey you're right. Though they could break that down even further and offer just the emulation software with the OS & ROM image seperately. That way people who already have a rom image could rip it from their system and if they already have the OS, there's no reason to purchase it again, right? I think H&P made the best move though. Bundle everything you need to run one or the other and say to hell with anyone who complains otherwise. It's funny as hell, have you read some of the stuff at alt.emulators.amiga... all the people whining about how they want one or the other and already have an Amiga with OS3.9 so they intend on using the same ROM and software as their computer system. Why would H&P want to cut out the profit and drive up piracy of the OS and ROM image? You and I both know that would happen.

I think the very best political cartoon I've ever seen is a picture of Markus Nerding dressed up as the Queen of England with Jurgen Haage holding a clipboard with the two words "Amithlon" and "AmigaXL" in a check list where the caption underneath says "Let them eat cake".

> And if there had been another product from H&P: Who cares? Amithlon
> had been the "real official emulator fully powered by Amiga Inc.".
> And as people here say: Hey the Amiga brand, that's the important
> thing!

So in theory you're telling me that if there was a third emulator that would have no native x86 compilation, horrible audio, and shakey stability at best would get more support over a better product simply because it would be backed by Amiga's official seal of approval? Like it would ever happen. That sounds about as bad as the sheep who support Microsoft.

> If Amiga releases OS4 then MorphOS will be dead.

That's a pretty bland statement. You of all people should know that when something is killed off, that doesn't mean the supporting efforts will be killed off instantly as well. Look at the Apple Newton, the Indian Motorcycle company, even Amiga for christ sake. Even if something bigger, badder, better comes along, there's still going to be support. If MorphOS comes out and the mass of the community flocks to MorphOS in droves, there will still be die-hard Amiga users even if MorphOS is identical to the AmigaOS. It doesn't make sense but you should know better than to make a statement like that.

[snipped as comment 165 answered overall question]

> There is a huge difference what Amiga Inc. want to do and what they
> actually can do.

Remember the nVidia announcment back in early 2000? So far what they haven't been able to do, they find a work around for it. That's better than some companies who usually brush off problems to be left forgotten.

> They announced first DE native devices for the end of May. Where are
> these?

Go to developer.sharpsec.com, click on "Latest News" need any other info? Or will you need to know information from other partners of Amiga Inc? Also, Sharp had products for demo in early June with the Zaurus being displayed (JavaOne convention).

> They made an announcement about Meternet's Simplebox running DE
> natively, no more updates about that.

This is information you need to talk with Bob Morris about. You can email him at rmorris@meternet.com. The last information I heard was components of the board were being redeveloped for x86 architecture. From there, stealthmode until further information is released.

> They made a deal with Sharp but actually in most press releases Amiga
> isn't mentioned but TAO is. Guess why.

Hey that's fun, let me try one. Gateway struck up a partnership with Pentagram designs and yet in all of the Pentagram press releases, Gateway isn't mentioned. Oo, I've got another! Apple signed a deal with Pentagram designs for the iMac and iBook cases yet Apple does not mention Pentagram in the press releases they have. I could go on forever with these... it's called cheesing, it's an act to try and prove your knowledge to another. Pathetic. Double check developer.sharpsec.com, the press release listed about Java content have information on Amiga with Tao being the partner of Amiga.

> They made an announcement about the AmigaOne/OS4 to be released in
> Q1/April/summer/November.

Yes! David Schiebler is the man of the hour. Congratulations Mr. Obvious on your task well done, now the world can rest easy knowing that information. Like Microsoft never had a release date slip. Laugh! I'm kind of curious how they ever could have done the Q1 release though, they just started AmigaOne talks at the very beginning of this year.

Now, let's get back to the topic at hand rather than wondering off squabling for scraps of information to try and prove a point.

In Reply to Comment 165:

> find someone to interpret German for you.

I'm looking for a German translator but no one is willing to offer any assistance outside of babel, even if they do speak/read both languages fluently. As you can tell, the help I've received here has been high marks on the bed and breakfast ratings. Perhaps Jurgen would like to give his official translation (not the same as an official statement).
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 167 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by priest on 07-Oct-2001 05:15 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (David Scheibler):
>They announced first DE native devices for the end of May. Where are
these?
Native devices, there will not be "DE native devices", who told you that?
As far as I know AmigaDE devices (PDAs) are being sold in asia...?
And AmigaDE apps can donwnloaded from Sharp's spacetown...?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 168 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Sinan Gurkan on 07-Oct-2001 06:12 GMT
R.S.:Q1 is planned for the boards to the end user.

Hmm at least 4 months...What will happen if Escena finishes their board
in 4 months ?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 169 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by C.Uceda on 07-Oct-2001 06:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 133 (Mike Veroukis):
@ Mike Veroukis

>When it comes to marketing it is. Brand name recognition is important.
>Look at all MicroSoft products. People buy them just because the word
>MicroSoft is on the box, nothing else. For them MicroSoft is the
>mainstream and is a safe option. They buy MicroSoft knowing that
>there might be something better, but they don't know what that might be.

You must not forget that "normal PC users" are a bit ignorant about what
they a re doing or buying. Is clear enough for us all that the majority
of the Skilled Amiga users know the fact that if MorphOS runs like the
old Amiga but modernized and runs a good amount of our software is the
clear path... All of us known what means Amiga and "Amiga-compatible"

As some one said this Chrismas will be very interesting! :)
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 170 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by David Scheibler on 07-Oct-2001 08:32 GMT
In reply to Comment 166 (the man in the shadows):
Ah you seem very well informed about the AmigaOne. But you should go
back to amiga.com and actually read the news there:

From Oct, 2000:

>The Eyetech AmigaOne PPC 1200 is a custom board which uses Eyetech
>Predator technology with the "zico" specification to provide a perfect
>synergy of classic and next generation. It provides all the functionality
>of the standalone AmigaOne PPC, but has been extended to mate with a
>classic Amiga A1200. This allows customers who have a serious investment
>in the classic Amiga to continue to use their machines whilst also having
>a brand new Amiga at their disposal. The 68k processor in the A1200 will
>be emulated at a substantially increased level via the PPC processor on
>the AmigaOne, whilst the classic operating system can take advantage of
>the AmigaOne's next generation hardware resources.

And the important one:

>Both these boards[A1 1200+4000] are scheduled to ship in 1Q01, with
>developer versions being available in December 2000.

Right, they discussed OS4 at the end of 2000 and the begin of 2001 when
they saw that the AmigaDE can't be used as a desktop computer
operating system
(BTW: You should ask some Amiga dealers how many AmigaSDKs and
AmigaDE DEV machines they actually sold...)

But hey: Be happy with your AmigaOne you'll buy on Nov 1st and I'll be happy
with the Pegaoso board.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 171 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by David Scheibler on 07-Oct-2001 08:32 GMT
In reply to Comment 166 (the man in the shadows):
Ah you seem very well informed about the AmigaOne. But you should go
back to amiga.com and actually read the news there:

From Oct, 2000:

>The Eyetech AmigaOne PPC 1200 is a custom board which uses Eyetech
>Predator technology with the "zico" specification to provide a perfect
>synergy of classic and next generation. It provides all the functionality
>of the standalone AmigaOne PPC, but has been extended to mate with a
>classic Amiga A1200. This allows customers who have a serious investment
>in the classic Amiga to continue to use their machines whilst also having
>a brand new Amiga at their disposal. The 68k processor in the A1200 will
>be emulated at a substantially increased level via the PPC processor on
>the AmigaOne, whilst the classic operating system can take advantage of
>the AmigaOne's next generation hardware resources.

And the important one:

>Both these boards[A1 1200+4000] are scheduled to ship in 1Q01, with
>developer versions being available in December 2000.

Right, they discussed OS4 at the end of 2000 and the begin of 2001 when
they saw that the AmigaDE can't be used as a desktop computer
operating system
(BTW: You should ask some Amiga dealers how many AmigaSDKs and
AmigaDE DEV machines they actually sold...)

But hey: Be happy with your AmigaOne you'll buy on Nov 1st and I'll be happy
with the Pegaoso board.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 172 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Mekanix on 07-Oct-2001 10:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 158 (Ralph Schmidt):
> and AInc basicly dead silent...

Or playing it professional. If Amiga Inc had to release a pressrelease every time you, mr. Haage, Hyperion and others aired another episode of your neverending soap, they wouldn't be doing anything else.

Amiga Inc. *do* cater for other business' than a few minor hasbeen amiga-players, so throwing themselves into this bitchfight wouldn't do them any good.

Amiga Inc. would do wise to cut all relation to all those loudmouthed antiproductive developers.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 173 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 07-Oct-2001 10:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 157 (David Scheibler):
Hello, David.Could you please give me an URL pointing exactly to where I specificly states that the AmigaDE is going to be a full-blown desktop OS?I'll trade for some pointing exactly to where I specificly states otherwise.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 174 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 07-Oct-2001 10:43 GMT
In reply to Comment 168 (Sinan Gurkan):
Sinan..do you really think the so called AOne/4.0 is still a concernfor me ? What i`m concerned are people like Kent Seaton and youwho still hype or believe into some illusion to protect someother people's weird interests which shouldn`t be *yours*.Your interest should only be to get a followup OS productand the modern HW for it.....
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 175 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 07-Oct-2001 10:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 154 (David Scheibler):
"If you don't so why do you think Ralph doesn't know anything aboutAmiga Inc? And are you saying H&P's statement about Amiga's competenceare wrong?"I say that *noone* but Amiga inc themselves knows. The only thing the rest of us can do is express our impressions of what they are doing and how they are doing it. Saying "Amiga inc are not capable of running a OS development project" without actually knowing anything is pure ignorance.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 176 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 07-Oct-2001 10:52 GMT
In reply to Comment 172 (Mekanix):
@mekanixWhat do you think to gain from creating explaination/excusesfor something others have to justify ?P.S. Too bad such arguments here always lead into the religious area where people which "believe" fight against everything which contradict the basement of their believes.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 177 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Adam Ceremuga on 07-Oct-2001 10:54 GMT
@mekanix
>Amiga Inc. would do wise to cut all relation to all those loudmouthed >antiproductive developers.
your ingorance is amazing.. 'These loudmouthed antiproductive developers' are what's left of the amiga development community.. yeah amiga inc should ditch all of them and replace them with more marketing press releases.. "the future is looking great!" :)

@ralph
> they couldn`t force them to
> do Warp3d for a MorphOS AmigaOS.
> o you must control the Amiga technology but they don't.
> 3.5 and 3.9 are controlled by H&P to my knowledge.

BUT advantages for working with amigainc
- partnership with matrox. you said you need to create drivers for bplan.. The dual head feature in the matrox would be quite cool if morphos supported it.
- i disagree with you about amiga and hyperion. if amiga said morph is OS4, hyperion would be in no position to decline development, esp with H&P out of the race at the moment. Hyperion do PPC 3D stuff.. You guys make a PPC OS.. THEY ARE IMPORTANT TO YOUR PLANS..
- Obviously name recognition, release Bplan/Morph as an amiga = widespread press coverage and sympathy. without = a lot less and only from hardcore amigans who know what morph is about..
- as far as i can tell 3.5/3.9 were just 3.1 + some extras. So what's your point? IF you included WB 3.1 in morph os it would decrease your overall development time and less chance of your q1 delivery date being postponed. you agree ralph?

BTW your partners Merlancia on their website is claiming this november/december for your motherboard based tsunami so you guys can be accused of vaporware too :)
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 178 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 07-Oct-2001 11:17 GMT
In reply to Comment 175 (Samface):
>I say that *noone* but Amiga inc themselves knows.Look..we negotiated with AInc..saw their reactionsto certain issues and also talked heavily with OSdevelopers which worked on WB 3.x. We discussedthe issue with several parties and i have not met*one* developer/party which had a different opinion.You can now believe that i only speak with biasedpeople but then there must be a LOT biased people.Even Mr. Haage said publicly that he doesn`t believethat AInc is able to handle an OS project.>The only thing the rest of us can do is express our>impressions of what they are doing and how they are doing it.Sammy..you're an **user** with absolute no contact tothe amiga developer and dealer circle. You base youropinions on what some official press statements oncesaid about big plans...developers/dealers look at the*reality*...they know who develops what and what not...they usually know about problems through certainindications or even private talks which are spreadedfurther you as an user never noticed.As CBM 3rd party developers we also knew a lot more aboutCBM's state and some people even knew more which had personalrelationships with CBM employees. What happened in May 94was already indicated internally around summer 93 whencertain key CBM developers left them and later in feb 94the end was near which caught all you out there like ashock.>Saying "Amiga inc are not capable of running a OS development>project" without actually knowing anything is pure ignorance.Maybe it`s just the reality...have you ever thought about thispossibility ? People which ignore the reality are the*ignorant* ones...not the people which do and act accordingthe *circumstances*.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 179 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by David Scheibler on 07-Oct-2001 11:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 173 (Samface):
Sorry, I remembered it wrongly. You didn't say that Amiga Inc. will
release a AmigaDE native OS but instead you said that there were
*never* plans to do this, what is wrong as they first planned it that way.
(see your comments on Amiga.org regarding the news article about
MorphOS running on Pegasos (Sep 2nd))
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 180 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Mahen on 07-Oct-2001 11:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 177 (Adam Ceremuga):
[Advantages for working with AInc]

I couldn't agree more. Also
Amiga's partnership with TAO
would bring the best java virtual
machine to the new OS, plus a bunch
a fresh new developers (plus the ones
who fled from the classic amiga because
of the amiga sdk)
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 181 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 07-Oct-2001 11:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 177 (Adam Ceremuga):
>Posted by Adam Ceremuga on 07-Oct-2001 12:54:51 @ralph> they couldn`t force them to> do Warp3d for a MorphOS AmigaOS.> o you must control the Amiga technology but they don't.> 3.5 and 3.9 are controlled by H&P to my knowledge.BUT advantages for working with amigainc>- partnership with matrox. you said you need to create drivers for bplan..> The dual head feature in the matrox would be quite cool if morphos supported it.There are also other gfxcards and who says we aren`table to get informations from Matrox too.>- i disagree with you about amiga and hyperion. if amiga said morph is OS4,>hyperion would be in no position to decline development, esp with H&P out ofI think i`ve already discussed the whole issue and i don`t reallythink there`s something to *disagree* about that.You can disagree about Hyperion being important to the market ornot but not disagree about what happened.>the race at the moment. Hyperion do PPC 3D stuff.. You guys make a PPC OS..We will do a 3d API with other partners which are interestedin it.>THEY ARE IMPORTANT TO YOUR PLANS..>- Obviously name recognition, release Bplan/Morph as an amiga>= widespread press coverage and sympathy.>without = a lot less and only from hardcore amigans who know what morph is about..I think i`ve already discussed this before...>- as far as i can tell 3.5/3.9 were just 3.1 + some extras.>So what's your point? IF you included WB 3.1 in morph os itThe point is that AInc doesn`t control that technology whichmeans they only have the Kickstart and the WB 3.1 left.But as we basicly have a Kickstart replacement and *all*WBs would need a heavy rework anyway there is basiclynothing really worthy from the sw side.The only factor AInc still controls is the name.>would decrease your overall development time and less chance>of your q1 delivery date being postponed. you agree ralph?Unlikely> BTW your partners Merlancia on their website is claiming this>november/december for your motherboard based tsunami so you guys>can be accused of vaporware too :)Well..true..all these products aren't available yet but wehave shown that MorphOS is *real*, we've shown that theppc mb is running Linux and we announced that MorphOS runson it which was only yet controlled by Olaf Barthel forAmiga Inc.That's a lot more than others have done or are able todo.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 182 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 07-Oct-2001 15:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 170 (David Scheibler):
> Ah you seem very well informed about the AmigaOne. But you should go
> back to amiga.com and actually read the news there:
>
> From Oct, 2000:
>
> ...
>
> Both these boards[A1 1200+4000] are scheduled to ship in 1Q01, with
> developer versions being available in December 2000.

You're right about one thing; they did release that information late 2000. I still don't see how it would have been possible for a Q1 release though. Mid year perhaps depending on resources, but definitely not as quickly as Q1. My gamble was before the end of this year, which still looks very likely.

> Right, they discussed OS4 at the end of 2000 and the begin of 2001 when
> they saw that the AmigaDE can't be used as a desktop computer
> operating system

Nod.

> (BTW: You should ask some Amiga dealers how many AmigaSDKs and
> AmigaDE DEV machines they actually sold...)

I already know the numbers. The DEV machines are pathetic in numbers and I know everyone who has one (counting everyone on one hand with two fingers left). That's what you get when you try to leverage off of x86 technology, it's not like everyone but the neighbors dog has one already. As for the SDK, there are more companies on a global scale that have the SDK verses the AmigaOS, that in itself should say quite a bit. The numbers sold to individual developers interested in the Amiga vs. those interested in the Tao perspective are radically different as well.

> But hey: Be happy with your AmigaOne you'll buy on Nov 1st and I'll be happy
> with the Pegaoso board.

You know for a fact the A1 board and software will be ready on November 1st? Is this some inside information you have that everyone else doesn't? I'm sure the A1 will be the first system out in the new generation of Amiga products (not just the namesake, but encompassing MorphOS systems as well) and my fingers have been itching to use a real Amiga system ever since October 2nd 2000 8:28pm.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 183 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 07-Oct-2001 15:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 174 (Ralph Schmidt):
> Sinan..do you really think the so called AOne/4.0 is still a concern
> for me ? What i`m concerned are people like Kent Seaton and you
> who still hype or believe into some illusion to protect some
> other people's weird interests which shouldn`t be *yours*.

I only contribute my statements only because no one else will. So why fly out in your passion of anger to question the attention you’re getting or attempts of disillusioning my own. Have you ever thought there are others out there just as boisterous and livid as I am about utter junk like the original post? I could drag out history on why I have chosen the path I have but doing so would be slander to MorphOS development. Instead, I stand up for what I believe in and defend my own interests be it a religious zealot or not. Don't condemn other people for doing the same. Weird interests indeed. Perhaps your focus should be more on the success of MorphOS rather than the failing of the "so called" OS4.

This mud slinging of drawing subject matter from outside these comments is really uncalled for if you ask me. If you want to counter an opinion, don't use something stated from the past, instead work with the material you're given at present (preferably in the same thread).

I've stated it many times before, it isn't that I won't support MorphOS, it's that I can't without the hardware. Granted Pegasos, Tsunami, and Torro systems will change everything but I would rather follow the path I've decided with the A1 systems. If MorphOS will run on the A1 board, great, I'll give it another try and judge it at that point. Until then, it makes no difference to me what happens with MorphOS. If you must know, my key interest is that of Tao more than Amiga. It's what Tao provides for Amiga that has more of an interest for me than what Amiga's A1 can provide.

> Your interest should only be to get a followup OS product
> and the modern HW for it.....

So as a consumer I have to be a sheep? I have absolutely no right to a public opinion? Your concern should really be focused on the people who will be purchasing systems that MorphOS runs rather than staying awake at night hoping you don’t find threads like this one.

"Sixteen men on a dead men's chest. Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum." - The Derelict, 1642, Author Unknown
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 184 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Sinan Gurkan on 07-Oct-2001 16:54 GMT
In reply to Comment 174 (Ralph Schmidt):
@Laire:
I just wondered if your team are willing to support an alternative
PPC motherboard or not ? (The thread is huge..I may have missed
the answer to this question)

I think Amiga brand is very important for MOS. Without the name MorphOS will have
a big public recognization problem...

I am beta-testing Olaf Barthel`s RoadShow TCP/IP Client and FFS2..
He is working hard to finish his software..I just want to use RoadShow
on a fast G3 PPC motherboard when it is finally finished...

All PPC developers have to come together...That is the only solution...
Forget the past, look at the future..Give people another chance...
You are all Germans, is it so impossible for all you to talk about
a solution to this problem...? You are the people that will make
or break the Amiga...

As a user/beta-testers, all of developers are important for me..(it should
be the same for every other Amiga user left)...I just want to use
Frieden brother`s, yours, Olaf Barthel, Sam Jordan`s and lots
of others that I can`t mention developments on the same OS/hardware...
Why split the effort where all of your targets are virtually the same...?

I seriously doubt that people will want to buy a expensive PPC motherboard
that can only run %50 of the current PPC software...Wouldn`t be it be great
if you were working with other developers for a BPlan version of iFusion...?
Even it would be a threat for Macintosh!..Other examples can be given...

Not signing that Amiga Inc contract is signing Amiga`s (and its follow up OSes)
death statement...
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 185 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Mekanix on 07-Oct-2001 18:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 176 (Ralph Schmidt):
> What do you think to gain from creating
> explaination/excuses for something others
> have to justify ?

Am I doing that? And here I thought I was just stating the obvious.

> P.S. Too bad such arguments here always
> lead into the religious area where people
> which "believe" fight against everything
> which contradict the basement of their believes.

You don't wanna borrow a comma or two? It took me several rereads before I got some sort of sence out of the above.

And why bring religion into this? Is your fight with Haage and the rest of the world a religious one?

Or are implying that because I'm not throwing myself at your feet after hearing your gospel, it *must* be because your obvious genious have shattered my worldview?

Well, here's some news to you: I'm not using an Amiga anymore and haven't for several years. I'm quite pleased and impressed with FreeBSD actually.

But I'm still keeping an eye on the old lady for old times sake. And what bugs me the most are you, mr. Haage, Hyperion and all those other unprofessional players in the marked. And reading the latest interview with Bill of AInc I guess I'm not the only one who's getting pissed! ;)

Any bets on how long it'll take till Fleecy flips the bird and leave you and your pals at Haage, Hyperion etc. behind to fight till you're all blue in your head and out of business?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 186 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Jürgen Lange on 07-Oct-2001 19:19 GMT
In reply to Comment 110 (Ralph Schmidt):
Ralph, Heine's translations are terrible! It's some Engrish (or German English).

Jürgen
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 187 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 07-Oct-2001 20:14 GMT
In reply to Comment 184 (Sinan Gurkan):
@SinanWho says we aren`t able to licence software controlled byOlaf Barthel ?Besides that you have no clue about the contract but let meassure you if we would have signed it, it would have meant*NO* OS product in the forseeable future for the HW we develop.So..it would have meant the death of the so called amiga sceneor market....a less little evil than a failure of Amiga Inc.P.S. My god...how naiv are you.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 188 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 07-Oct-2001 20:14 GMT
In reply to Comment 184 (Sinan Gurkan):
previous msg is by me..forgot the name
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 189 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Ralph Schmidt on 07-Oct-2001 20:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 185 (Mekanix):
>Am I doing that? And here I thought I was just stating the obvious.But what`s obvious to *you* because you lack the informationsmay not be real.As I only keep an eye on the AMD/Intel happeningsi also lack the informations to judge what is *really*going on...what may be obvious may not be real either.And even if i would concentrate on that i wouldlack the information sources to judge what`s reallygoing on...i could only make some uneducated guesseswhich aren`t sufficient.But in the amiga area i don`t lack the informationsources to do more than an educated guess about whatis going on because i`m *part* of that playfield.Is this so difficult to accept ?> P.S. Too bad such arguments here always> lead into the religious area where people> which "believe" fight against everything> which contradict the basement of their believes.>You don't wanna borrow a comma or two? It took me several rereads before I got some sort of sence out of the above.Sorry..but germans have a way to construct long sentences toforce people to pay some attention:-)>And why bring religion into this? Is your fight with Haage>and the rest of the world a religious one?Whatever Amiga flavour acted the last 6 years it`sreasoning was always defended for imho religiouscult side reasons.... Probably everybody stillremembers the unbelievable excuses for AmigaInternation(Gateway)'s strategic failures.I have no active fight with H&P..i justdon`t work with them...plain and simple.There`s nothing religious about this.>Or are implying that because I'm not throwing myself at your feet>after hearing your gospel, it *must* be because your obvious genious>have shattered my worldview?No...i have no problem with people with other opinionsbut then they should try to argue logically.You based your reasoning on "believe".>Well, here's some news to you: I'm not using an Amiga anymore>and haven't for several years. I'm quite pleased and impressed>with FreeBSD actually.I also use FreeBSD..and ?>But I'm still keeping an eye on the old lady for old times sake.But keeping *an* eye on the old lady is not enough to judgewhat's really happening. You only see some public statementsfrom xyz and then when it bubbles up like in this thread.Then you may only decide which side you sympathize with onthe base of *how* somebody writes here and not about whatsomebody *says* and if what he says could be real.>And what bugs me the most are you, mr. Haage, Hyperion and all>those other unprofessional players in the marked. And reading theTo call somebody unprofessional while only keeping an eyeon this market gives you what informations again ?..notsufficient ones.It`s not professional to shut your mouth while the amigascene goes under..i prefer to make a public stand againstthis unlike 99.99999% of you out there i also work ona SW & HW solution.>latest interview with Bill of AInc I guess I'm not the only one>who's getting pissed! ;)Maybe also research when that interview was held...maybe alsoconnect that with the informations people got here in thisthread.>Any bets on how long it'll take till Fleecy flips the bird and>leave you and your pals at Haage, Hyperion etc. behind to fight>till you're all blue in your head and out of business?Haven`t you noticed yet that the so called PPC war is***over***. Monday showed that one party left thepropaganda playfield and now focuses on x86.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 190 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Solneman on 07-Oct-2001 20:54 GMT
I'm sorry, that last paragraph may have been unclear. Let's pose a hypothetical situation. If, say, Petro Tystchenko had provided Ralph Schmidt with access to AmigaOS source files, on a covert basis, and that access had contributed significantly to the success of MorphOS, then Ralph would have a moral obligation to Amiga because it was their source code which helped him. This is above and beyond any legal ramifications. DON'T GET UPSET -- THIS IS ONLY A HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION! Petro did *not* give Ralph a copy of AmigaOS source code.That's true it wasn't Pedro .....
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 191 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Smith Rouelle on 07-Oct-2001 21:15 GMT
In reply to Comment 190 (Solneman):
What are you on about? Why are you making up baseless rumours? Is your last resort to slander MorphOS?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 192 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 08-Oct-2001 02:43 GMT
In reply to Comment 191 (Smith Rouelle):
At least I remember Phase 5 claiming to have a license for OS3.1.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 193 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Mekanix on 08-Oct-2001 06:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 189 (Ralph Schmidt):
> No...i have no problem with people
> with other opinions but then they
> should try to argue logically.
> You based your reasoning on "believe".

Ahh, the classic: "If you can't argue, try miscrediting you opponents way of reasoning." There is nothing illogical about my reasoning. Prof. business isn't done by slandering opponents in public. And I've never seen Amiga Inc participating in public slandering since Fleecy and Bill took over. So what would be the *logical* deduction of Amiga Inc's silence in this the latest episode of your soap? Correct!
Now, let's move on and *you* try arguing logically! ;)

> To call somebody unprofessional while
> only keeping an eye on this market gives
> you what informations again ?..not
> sufficient ones.

Slandering people in public is *always* unprofessionel. All the "information" I need to make such a "bold" statement is just to watch this soap!

> It`s not professional to shut your mouth while the
> amiga scene goes under..i prefer to make a public
> stand against this unlike 99.999990f you out there
> i also work on a SW & HW solution.

Now, is it *really* going under... or is the party going on elsewhere and you're not invited?

> Maybe also research when that interview was
> held...maybe also connect that with the
> informations people got here in this
> thread.

According to the inteview, it took place on october 2nd.

> Haven`t you noticed yet that the so called
> PPC war is ***over***. Monday showed that
> one party left the propaganda playfield and
> now focuses on x86.

Hmm, all I've gathered is that Haage might have been derailed from the OS-project. That Eyetech and Haage accuse eachother of not delivering. That you have been busy throwing gasoline on the bonfires. That Haage with Amithlon/AmigaXL is (finally) opening the door for x86. And Bill reafirming (finally) that x86 *still* is a target of OS5.

And if it were true that the PPC war is over, all you'd need to do is to lean back, light you cuban and enjoy the ride. You have won.

But that's not what we are seeing, is it? I've *never* seen Ralph Smith panicing as much as he do now. Miscrediting Amiga Inc at any opportunity as incompetent to lead any OS-project. Positioning MorphOS as the only future, trying to secure the last bit of a miniscule market. Plus the usual grudge against Haage, Hypering, Warp3D and the rest of the world.
What would the logic conclusion of this be? That Ralph Schmidt feels the rope tightening around his neck? That Ralph Schmidt isn't telling *everything* his so called sourced is whispering in his ear?

What are you fearing, Ralph Schmidt?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 194 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 08-Oct-2001 06:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 189 (Ralph Schmidt):
"Haven`t you noticed yet that the so called PPC war is
***over***. Monday showed that one party left the
propaganda playfield and now focuses on x86."

According to Bill in the latest interview, AOS4 is *NOT* dead. Employees of Amiga inc is working on it right now, the FFS2 and the new TCP/IP stack is under beta-testing. What makes you think the war is over?

I find it really unprofessional of you to take advantage of this confused situation. You know what's over? I say your "party" is over, herr Schmidt.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 195 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Sinan Gurkan on 08-Oct-2001 07:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 187 (Anonymous):
@Laire

Did you discuss the contract with Amiga Inc, Did you request any changes , Have Amiga Inc rejected your request ?

You say that things have changed since May...Maybe it is time for requesting a new contract ?

Let's assume it is Q1 2002 and Pegasos is ready..Will you re-consider signing the contract ?

BTW.I am not against anyone..I just want a new AmigaOS for PPC...(I don't care which kernel it uses as long as all past/future PPC products support it)
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 196 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by adam ceremuga on 08-Oct-2001 07:19 GMT
@samface
as ralph has stated the work you stated as being carried out by amiga is done by a 'olaf somone' who owns. i cannot verify what ralph says but it seems plausible. also do you automatically accept what bill says? over the last 2 years 3 executive updates have amigaDE with 3d/Sound/Sheep/everything will be out in the next couple of weeks. A year later i am betting the upcoming DE player will not include these features as bill admitted/ "not a desktop os"

@sinan
good questions. i'm glad you see that morphos is a possible os4..
noticed the amigaart posting :)
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 197 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Smith Rouelle on 08-Oct-2001 07:37 GMT
In reply to Comment 193 (Mekanix):
>And I've never seen Amiga Inc participating in public slandering since Fleecy >and Bill took over. So what would be the *logical* deduction of Amiga Inc's >silence in this the latest episode of your soap? Correct!
>Now, let's move on and *you* try arguing logically! ;)

Look again, more specifically at Fleecy's aggressive posts on ANN early this year.

>> Maybe also research when that interview was
>> held...maybe also connect that with the
>> informations people got here in this
>> thread.
>According to the inteview, it took place on october 2nd.

There was date in the interview. Furthermore, it was translated from English to German (for a German magazine), then back to English (from the magazine interview). So any quips that Bill is sounding angry can be discounted, because any implicit meanings will have been lost in the 2 translations.

>What would the logic conclusion of this be? That Ralph Schmidt feels the rope >tightening around his neck? That Ralph Schmidt isn't telling *everything* his >so called sourced is whispering in his ear?

>What are you fearing, Ralph Schmidt?

The only rope that would appear is IF AmigaOne/OS4 is released on November 1st or soon after... if it doesn't then we can all see plainly that Ralph hasn't embarked on some elaborate conspiracy that you seem to be accusing him of.

Are you prepared to offer a public apology to Ralph on November 1st, if, on the small chance AmigaOne/OS4 isn't released and yet another 'strategy' is announced.
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 198 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Smith Rouelle on 08-Oct-2001 07:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 197 (Smith Rouelle):
>There was date in the interview

That should be NO date!

Smithy
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 199 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 08-Oct-2001 07:54 GMT
Well, I thought I'd give you guys my overall view on all this. I don't know if it's worth anything though since I don't think there's not many people left with patience enough to go through this long thread... but hey, for whatever it's worth:

First of all, there are no *facts* telling us about the AmigaOS4 project's status at all except that it's still in the works. Yes, H&P shouldn't be talking about Amiga inc's capability of running a OS development project in public, that's very unprofessional and I'm sure Amiga inc will work things out with them *internaly*. So, my first point beeing; we need to know alot more before we say things like "the project is a failure" or "Amiga inc is not capable of running a OS development project". And I must say; that goes for you too, herr Schmidt.

Second of all, what if Amiga inc would fail? I mean, would it be a benefit to anyone of us? I don't even think it would be a benefit to the MorphOS team. Let's put it like this: No Windows, no OS/2. You see Ralph, if Amiga inc would fail, most people would *not* see the MorphOS as an alternative. Look at our history, what has happened everytime the owner of the Amiga brand has gone under? Well, most just left the Amiga market completely and I think this time will be of no difference. It's not about what product will be the better, it's about survival of the Amiga brand. If the owner of the brand fails yet again, do you think there will be many people left still trusting in an Amiga product? Yes, your product doesn't use the Amiga brand, but it's still an Amiga product in the eyes of the user. Profitability in the already small market that is left will die with the brand. So, my second point beeing; Amiga inc's failure would *not* be a benefit to the MorphOS team.

My third point would be what Mekanix already posted above, what is it that you fear, herr Schmidt?
"party on:-)" (R.S.) : Comment 200 of 233ANN.lu
Posted by Samface on 08-Oct-2001 08:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 196 (adam ceremuga):
"as ralph has stated the work you stated as being carried out by amiga is done by a 'olaf somone' who owns. i cannot verify what ralph says but it seems plausible. also do you automatically accept what bill says?"

Seems plausible... Do you automatically accept everything Ralph says?

"over the last 2 years 3 executive updates have amigaDE with 3d/Sound/Sheep/everything will be out in the next couple of weeks. A year later i am betting the upcoming DE player will not include these features as bill admitted/ "not a desktop os"

Well, you seem a little confused here. You have to remember that AmigaOS5 is the *final* product with the AmigaOS and the AmigaDE merged as one, meaning the AmigaDE *with* (as added features meaning that the AmigaDE itself won't give you those features on it's own) 3d/Sound/Sheep/everything *is* AmigaOS5. It's just like they said when they officially announced their plans for the AmigaOS4.x series, no plans regarding the AmigaDE has changed. All they ever did was *add* plans to their strategy, still having the same goal.
Anonymous, there are 233 items in your selection (but only 83 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 233]
Back to Top