07-Dec-2021 03:52 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 147 items in your selection [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 147]
[News] Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga LawsuitANN.lu
Posted on 25-Sep-2003 20:26 GMT by Rich Woods147 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit Although I have known about this action since last weekend I have refrained from posting this info until I had the court documentation available. It has just become available today.

23 MOTION Requesting Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant by Amiga Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Temp5, ) (Entered: 09/25/2003)

09/19/2003

24 DECLARATION of DIANA S. SHUKIS in Support of 23 MOTION RequestingLeave to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant, filed by Defendant Amiga Inc. re (Temp5, ) (Entered: 09/25/2003)

09/19/2003

25 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant Amiga Inc re 23 MOTION for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel, 24 Declaration of Diana S. Shukis. (Temp5, ) (Entered: 09/25/2003)

Amiga's attorney's have filed a motion before the Federal Court to withdraw as Attorneys for Amiga - effectively leaving them with no counsel.

This means that they could default on their action(s) and counter-claims.

The documents are available at:

Certificate of Service To Withdraw

Shukis Withdrawl

Withdrawal of Counsel 1

Withdrawal of counsel 2

Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 1 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Emeric SH on 25-Sep-2003 18:31 GMT
A fresh light on the chance of the outcome and the promising new deals. But maybe I'm too hasty with my conclusions, I agree. But their attorney abandoning the ship is not the kind of a good sign. Does these news make it to amigaworld.net? Or is it still shiny and calm there? Someone visiting that site?
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 2 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 18:32 GMT
I have not read the documents yet, but why would an Attorney want to withdraw in the middle of a process? Haven't they got their payments? Oh well, I'll do some reading now ...
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 3 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 18:32 GMT
I have not read the documents yet, but why would an Attorney want to withdraw in the middle of a process? Haven't they got their payments? Oh well, I'll do some reading now ...
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 4 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by dammy on 25-Sep-2003 18:33 GMT
Guess getting paid in Food Stamps is not enough any more for these lawyers. Hrmf!

Dammy
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 5 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 18:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (Emeric SH):
{Posted by Emeric SH (81.182.80.15) on 25-Sep-2003 20:31:21

A fresh light on the chance of the outcome and the promising new deals. But maybe I'm too hasty with my conclusions, I agree. But their attorney abandoning the ship is not the kind of a good sign. Does these news make it to amigaworld.net? Or is it still shiny and calm there? Someone visiting that site?

-------------
Funny but I posted info on moobunny and then worked on the html code for the links and someone posted the info here REAL quick!
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 6 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 18:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (Emeric SH):
> Does these news make it to amigaworld.net?

I doubt it. From the reaction of the article about the Amiga Inc situation over at amiga.org (an article that didn't contain any *news*, but an unbiased briefing of *allready known facts*), I get the feeling that some people are still living in a special kind of "reality", carefully shielded off and protected from the reality the rest of us are living in ...
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 7 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 18:43 GMT
Hmm, I just got to the first page of the first document, but is:

Amiga Inc.
PO Box 887
Ravensdale, WA 98051

... Amiga Inc's current address? I was under the impression that they had no office?
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 8 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 18:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (takemehomegrandma):
(Correction, SECOND page of the first document) :-)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 9 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Bill Hoggett on 25-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (takemehomegrandma):
@takemehomegrandma

They don't. That's a PO Box address.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 10 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 25-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (takemehomegrandma):
Office in a box? Hmm, maybe it's made of carton? ;)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 11 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 18:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (takemehomegrandma):
Posted by takemehomegrandma (Trusted user) on 25-Sep-2003 20:43:18

Hmm, I just got to the first page of the first document, but is:

Amiga Inc.
PO Box 887
Ravensdale, WA 98051

... Amiga Inc's current address? I was under the impression that they had no office?

-----------------
They do have an office - at the Ravensdale PO.

I'll post a picture of the PO along with a pic of Box 887 LATER - hell posted billyboy's address - I guess they can't complain about a picture of a PO Box?
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 12 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Kronos on 25-Sep-2003 18:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (takemehomegrandma):
A office in a post-box ?

Man I've heard about crowded workplaces,but that......
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 13 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Kronos on 25-Sep-2003 18:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 12 (Kronos):
To slow,much to slow ......
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 14 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Tryo on 25-Sep-2003 18:52 GMT
In reply to Comment 12 (Kronos):
Now guess why they sold their "old and not needed furniture". Problems with fitting the whole stuff in their new PO-Box office.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 15 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 18:55 GMT
The "Withdrawal of counsel 2" document was the most interesting IMO:

"THIS COURT HEREBY orders, adjudges and decrees that Diana S. Shukis, Stephen P. VanDerhoef and Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S. may withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant Amiga, Inc. The withdrawal is effective immediately upon entry of this Order."

Hmm ...
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 16 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by T_Bone on 25-Sep-2003 18:56 GMT
Amiga's lawyer realized that the only way Amiga will make money is if they LOSE the case, and have to accept licensing fees from Genesi.

As a lawyer, what do you do when winning the case means you dont get paid?
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 17 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 18:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (takemehomegrandma):
Posted by takemehomegrandma (Trusted user) on 25-Sep-2003 20:55:32

The "Withdrawal of counsel 2" document was the most interesting IMO:

"THIS COURT HEREBY orders, adjudges and decrees that Diana S. Shukis, Stephen P. VanDerhoef and Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S. may withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant Amiga, Inc. The withdrawal is effective immediately upon entry of this Order."

Hmm ...

-------------------
Don't get this confused with an actual order. This is the order that the lawyers prepared IN CASE Judge Lasnik authorizes their withdrawal.

When it's SIGNED by Judge Lasnik - then it becomes an OFFICIAL JUDICIAL ORDER.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 18 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 19:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 17 (Rich Woods):
OK, thanks for the clarification.

Well, please repost it when it's signed then ...!
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 19 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by T_Bone on 25-Sep-2003 19:02 GMT
Well, look at the bright side, things can't get WORSE.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 20 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 25-Sep-2003 19:03 GMT
Haven't read the documents, so forgive me for this simple question: have the withdrawals been accepted by the judge? If not, for what I know about USA's law, he might also reject them.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 21 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 19:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 18 (takemehomegrandma):
Posted by takemehomegrandma (Trusted user) on 25-Sep-2003 21:00:16

In Reply to Comment 17:
OK, thanks for the clarification.

Well, please repost it when it's signed then ...!
--------------
I will - if he reviews it today - but then it is days before the docsget posted. As you notice these docs were filed on Sep 19 but not entered until today.

I just may call Judge Lasnik's court clerk tommorrow and get info on if it was(is) being ruled on.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 22 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 19:05 GMT
In reply to Comment 20 (Fabio Alemagna):
Posted by Fabio Alemagna (151.26.70.22) on 25-Sep-2003 21:03:07

Haven't read the documents, so forgive me for this simple question: have the withdrawals been accepted by the judge? If not, for what I know about USA's law, he might also reject them.
-------------
Yes he could reject them - but the underlying situation will be known by the judge (Amiga has "about $100 in the bank") and will know the lawyers won't work for free.

The odds are almost a given that he'll grant the motion. And looking atbillyboy's statement about the $100 he'll probably ask billyboy if he can retain other counsel.

Of course knowing billyboy he try and get more time out of the judge - I don't think the judge is going to like billyboy's answers very much.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 23 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 25-Sep-2003 19:10 GMT
In reply to Comment 22 (Rich Woods):
However, at this point it must be said that if the lack of money is the reason for which the attorneys withdrawed, and it's not the fact that they believed they couldn't win, then nothing can be said about Amiga Inc.'s position in the case (that is, whether they were right or wrong): as we all know, often people who are right are forced to abandon the case because they can't afford it, in fact this is the most common remark that is made to the USA legal system.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 24 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 19:10 GMT
In reply to Comment 19 (T_Bone):
Worse for whom, the Stock Option Owners in Amiga Inc, or the Amiga Community?

I'd say that it would be a good thing(tm) for the Community if Amiga Inc would just go away ...
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 25 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 19:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 21 (Rich Woods):
> I just may call Judge Lasnik's court clerk tommorrow and get info on if it
> was(is) being ruled on.

Please do that, and post the answer in this thread!
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 26 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Martin Blom on 25-Sep-2003 19:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 19 (T_Bone):
Hahaha .... yeah right.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 27 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 19:17 GMT
In reply to Comment 25 (takemehomegrandma):
25 of 26

Posted by takemehomegrandma (Trusted user) on 25-Sep-2003 21:11:47

In Reply to Comment 21:
> I just may call Judge Lasnik's court clerk tommorrow and get info on if it
> was(is) being ruled on.

Please do that, and post the answer in this thread!

-------------------
I certainly will - doubtful the judge is going to rule on this motion right away - he will want to consult with the attorneys for both sides.

I am afraid that a Federal court ordered bankruptcy will follow. The odds are getting greater.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 28 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 25-Sep-2003 19:25 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (Emeric SH):
So, one lawyer leaves and another takes her place. Big deal. Whats so fascinating about a bit of red tape - beyond of course listening to Rich Woods amazing conjecture :-)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 29 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 25-Sep-2003 19:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 28 (Anonymous):
> So, one lawyer leaves and another takes her place

Really? So who's going to take her place?
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 30 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 19:31 GMT
In reply to Comment 28 (Anonymous):
> So, one lawyer leaves and another takes her place. Big deal.

You don't think that reputations gets spread around? The lawyer's will hardly stand in line to be able to get an "abandoned case" like this, but that is of course my own speculation. We will see what happens! Another chapter in the Amiga Inc saga ...
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 31 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 19:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 30 (takemehomegrandma):
Posted by takemehomegrandma (Trusted user) on 25-Sep-2003 21:31:04

In Reply to Comment 28:
> So, one lawyer leaves and another takes her place. Big deal.

You don't think that reputations gets spread around? The lawyer's will hardly stand in line to be able to get an "abandoned case" like this, but that is of course my own speculation. We will see what happens! Another chapter in the Amiga Inc saga ...
------------------
Your "speculation" is well spot on!
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 32 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 25-Sep-2003 19:36 GMT
In reply to Comment 30 (takemehomegrandma):
You think you know the reasons for one lawyer withdrawing, that from what I can see is pure speculation based on your own personal viewpoint.

Who replace? Someone from the same lawfirm perhaps? Maybe another one?

Cue round of "oooh Im so witty Im going to post something about only being able to pay them in monopoly money ha ha ha".

Or you could go no win no fee. Either or, the hype on here and the spin on how to interpret this bit of court red tape is fascinating. I'm amazed that otherwise intelligent people cannot see this in themselves.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 33 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by T_Bone on 25-Sep-2003 19:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 28 (Anonymous):
> So, one lawyer leaves and another takes her place. Big deal. Whats so
> fascinating about a bit of red tape

GUFFAW!!! HEEEYAW!!

Yea, they're just LINING up around the corner to be the next in line for that "Less than $100 in checking account" Lawyer fee BONANZA!!!

WOOOHAW!!!
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 34 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 25-Sep-2003 19:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 33 (T_Bone):
...a prime example of what I just described.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 35 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 25-Sep-2003 19:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 32 (Anonymous):
What we see is your poor attempt at emulating samface.

There's a news, we're discussing it and speculating on it. If you don't care about it, you're invited to not post useless and meaningless comments who only state the obvious surrounded by wannabe anonymous trolling.

Btw, nice one on OSNews, saw you got moderated ;)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 36 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by T_Bone on 25-Sep-2003 19:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 32 (Anonymous):
> Who replace? Someone from the same lawfirm perhaps?

No, you didn't read it? The entire firm is washing their hands of Amiga, not just the one Lawyer.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 37 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Paul Gadd on 25-Sep-2003 19:40 GMT
Bill Buck must be a total fool to even want any sort of buisness relationship with crooks, sorry Bill but doing any sort of buisness with criminals is not acceptable, it puts you in a bad light and will paint you with the same crooked brush amiga inc has been using.

If however your not then clearly state it.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 38 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 19:41 GMT
In reply to Comment 32 (Anonymous):
Posted by Anonymous (80.9.224.41) on 25-Sep-2003 21:36:12

In Reply to Comment 30:
You think you know the reasons for one lawyer withdrawing, that from what I can see is pure speculation based on your own personal viewpoint.
-----------------
Better re-read the court docket. The court docket lists 2 lawyers representing Amiga - both from the same law firm.

The motion to withdraw includes the entire law firm not just Shukis.

Believe me , I know this gets confusing for you.




Who replace? Someone from the same lawfirm perhaps? Maybe another one?
----------------------
Yeah - someone from the same law firm is going to handle the case now. Uh huh...


Cue round of "oooh Im so witty Im going to post something about only being able to pay them in monopoly money ha ha ha".

You posted it - not me!


Or you could go no win no fee. Either or, the hype on here and the spin on how

This is a Federal Court Case - the lawyers get paid for their hourly fees - this is NOT an accident case where lawyers work on contingency.


to interpret this bit of court red tape is fascinating. I'm amazed that otherwise intelligent people cannot see this in themselves.

Well you made one lucid comment.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 39 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 25-Sep-2003 19:41 GMT
In reply to Comment 35 (Fabio Alemagna):
Oh please Fabio, so one cannot have an opinion if it does not dovetail with the
great Fabio. Instead, you have to be called "Samface" or "pathetic" and other minor personal insults.

If your post contained adult discourse, I would consider answering it with more of my point of view. As it is, you have proved for the nth time today that you cannot hold your own in debate.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 40 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Bill Hoggett on 25-Sep-2003 19:42 GMT
In reply to Comment 32 (Anonymous):
Actually, the speculation is normal but of course no one outside McEwen, the lawyer and possibly the judge knows the reason behind it.

Assuming that this means the end of the line for Amiga Inc is pure speculation, as is assuming that the lawyer will simply be replaced by another one.

Let's wait and see what happens next.

Personally, I doubt this is something Amiga Inc would have wanted, particularly if their case was going well, but I don't expect to hear any truthful comments coming from that direction.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 41 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 25-Sep-2003 19:43 GMT
In reply to Comment 40 (Bill Hoggett):
And there I read the first ( other than myself of course ;-) ) sensible post on the thread.

Watch and learn Rich, T_Bone, Fabio, takemehomegrandma and all.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 42 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 25-Sep-2003 19:48 GMT
In reply to Comment 41 (Anonymous):
41 of 41




Posted by Anonymous (80.9.224.41) on 25-Sep-2003 21:43:20

In Reply to Comment 40:
And there I read the first ( other than myself of course ;-) ) sensible post on the thread.

Watch and learn Rich, T_Bone, Fabio, takemehomegrandma and all.
-------------------
Could you give us the reasons why a Federal judge would let a law firm withdraw from a 8+ month old case according to Federal Rules and Procedure?
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 43 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by T_Bone on 25-Sep-2003 19:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 41 (Anonymous):
> And there I read the first ( other than myself of course ;-) ) sensible post on
> the thread.

Try POSTING one sometime. Or at a bare minimum, READ the articles linked to the story so we don't have to keep correcting you on details you missed.

At least Samface is intelligent enough to do that, even if I disagree with his conclusions.

Other lawyer from the same firm indeed. Sheesh. Nobody values reading comprehension anymore. How embarassing.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 44 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 25-Sep-2003 19:51 GMT
In reply to Comment 39 (Anonymous):
> Oh please Fabio, so one cannot have an opinion if it does not dovetail with the
> great Fabio.

Sorry? Did I say you can't have an opinion? Au contraire it seems it's you the one who is criticizing our freedom to talk about this issue. If _that_ is your opinion, that is if your opinion is that we are not free to talk abotu such stuff without being subject of your superior judgment, then indeed you're not entitled to it.

> nstead, you have to be called "Samface" or "pathetic" and other minor personal
> insults.

Oh, well, I don't really see where I called you "pathetic" up there, but I realize that your anger is making you go blind, and as for Samface being an insult... well, you said it :-)


> if your post contained adult discourse, I would consider answering it with
> more of my point of view. As it is, you have proved for the nth time today
> that you cannot hold your own in debate.

Sorry? Are you by any chance forgetting that I was replying to an useless post of yours?

:)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 45 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 19:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 40 (Bill Hoggett):
> Let's wait and see what happens next.

Of course! What else could we do? ;-)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 46 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 25-Sep-2003 19:53 GMT
In reply to Comment 41 (Anonymous):
> And there I read the first ( other than myself of course ;-) ) sensible post on
> the thread.

Your post was contraddicted by the one you're replying to, wanadoo. Try to learn how to read, make yourself this favour.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 47 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 25-Sep-2003 19:54 GMT
Perhaps some lawyer would do some pro bono charity work here? Amiga Inc *is* kind of homeless after all ...
:-P

(Nah, sorry for that ...)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 48 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by T_Bone on 25-Sep-2003 19:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 47 (takemehomegrandma):
There arn't too many "Ambulance Chasing" Lawyers that handle Corporate Contract law. We're not talking about Grandma slipping in Kmarts parking lot. Lawyers dealing in these cases expect to get paid. :)
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 49 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Gabriele Favrin on 25-Sep-2003 19:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 39 (Anonymous):
>Oh please Fabio, so one cannot have an opinion if it does
>not dovetail with the
>great Fabio. Instead, you have to be called "Samface" or

I for first do NOT like Fabio behaviour in many occasions,
but between him and an anonyous silly kid who hasn't even
the courage to sign his own words, I surely find more
serious and trstablke who used his name and surname.

So, please, switch page, move to Amiga one and start writing
support letter to your myths. Hope you'll sign at least
them.

Learn from adults.
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 50 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 25-Sep-2003 20:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 49 (Gabriele Favrin):
Gabrielle

If I considered your behaviour adult, then I would try to learn from you. But I don't.

I will continue to post here as often as I like and with views that you clearly do not like. If I had to choose between what you try to patronise as a "silly little kid who is too scared to sign their name" and a pompous oaf like yourself I'd choose the "silly little kid" any time.

Either way, you will not bully me off this site. If you aren't prepared to discuss the topic at hand and would rather have a go at me, why don't you start a new forum thread for the purpose?

Still, you could of course continue to be an oaf and pollute this one.

I just love the way people use this tactic to have a go at "Anonymous" posters. If Christian removes the ability to post anonymously, I will fill in some BS details. You will still be back at square one, frustrated that you cannot take retribution against someone who doesn't hold the same point of view as yourself.

Stop it Gabrielle, and Fabio, you are embarrassing yourselves.
Anonymous, there are 147 items in your selection [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 147]
Back to Top