| [News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments
View flat
View list | |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 101 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 07:28 GMT | In reply to Comment 99 (TheRealNapster):
In Reply to Comment 97:
@ Dick Woods
>>You are doing a good job of BLOWING this thread and taking it off the path for which the conversation was intended.
WTF?? You took it OFF TOPIC by posting crap like this FOR NO GOOD REASON:
"you better hurry up and call the court clerk and get an affadavit to the judge - you've got until this Friday AM. "
"Phew - thank goodness we have legal talent like yourself that can straighten out this whole mess."
Don't blame me that you can't FORM A REASONABLE RESPONSE to a post. Don't post RUDE JACKASS RESPONSES to someone that wasn't talking to you anyway.
You can blame me for all your problems, see if I give a sh1t. Everybody knows the truth though, you're a sad like stalker that has NEVER ONCE posted anything with out being a JERK.
-----------------------
A most responsive posting - attesting to the magnificsence of your mental ability to converse in a meaningful discourse with those to whom you wish to reply! |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 102 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by TheRealNapster on 17-Nov-2003 07:30 GMT | In reply to Comment 101 (Rich Woods):
@ Dick Woods
>>A most responsive posting - attesting to the magnificsence of your mental ability to... blah blah blah
Are you going to answer me?
Why did you insult me? You don't know me. I said nothing to you. I said nothing that had anything to do with you?
So? Why the insult? If you had an opinion on my post why didn't you just post something refuting it?
Why? |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 103 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Atheist2 on 17-Nov-2003 07:33 GMT | In reply to Comment 98 (Rich Woods):
Comment 98 Posted by Rich Woods
/*
Aren't you intelligent enough to know I was the one that posted the court documents - and paid for it on MY DIME?
*/
I'm aware of you buying the documents, and posting them. (Didn't you ask for a donation, at one time, to see them?)
/*
You don't know who sued for back pay?
My, oh my!
*/
I think a Mr. Fontenont, maybe 2 more, and I thought YOU as well. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 104 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 07:36 GMT | In reply to Comment 102 (TheRealNapster):
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 102 of 102
Posted by TheRealNapster (Trusted user) on 17-Nov-2003 08:30:59
In Reply to Comment 101:
@ Dick Woods
>>A most responsive posting - attesting to the magnificsence of your mental ability to... blah blah blah
Are you going to answer me?
-------------
Oh my God - you're so funny! I did! Many times! You are simply hilarious.
------------------
Why did you insult me? You don't know me. I said nothing to you. I said nothing that had anything to do with you?
-----------------
Hahha - you said you know ME! Read your previous posts. Damn - this is simply too much.
----------------
So? Why the insult? If you had an opinion on my post why didn't you just post something refuting it?
----------------
How is it possible to insult a FOOL? This is too much. Go to the Merlancia/Ryan link and post there - you might make sense to those that post in that forum.
You've BLOWN your cover here. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 105 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by TheRealNapster on 17-Nov-2003 07:39 GMT | In reply to Comment 104 (Rich Woods):
@ Dick Woods
Are you going to answer me?
-------------
Oh my God - you're so funny! I did! Many times! You are simply hilarious.
------------------
Why did you insult me? You don't know me. I said nothing to you. I said nothing that had anything to do with you?
-----------------
Hahha - you said you know ME! Read your previous posts. Damn - this is simply too much.
----------------
So? Why the insult? If you had an opinion on my post why didn't you just post something refuting it?
----------------
How is it possible to insult a FOOL? This is too much. Go to the Merlancia/Ryan link and post there - you might make sense to those that post in that forum.
You've BLOWN your cover here.
======================================================
Where did you answer me? I have yet to see a response as to why you insulted me out of the clear blue sky. And you had (have) no idea who I was when you made that post.
You can't even answer a simple question?
Why did you do it? <--- No You haven't answered this. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 106 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 07:39 GMT | In reply to Comment 103 (Atheist2):
Posted by Atheist2 (24.69.255.237) on 17-Nov-2003 08:33:41
In Reply to Comment 98:
Comment 98 Posted by Rich Woods
/*
Aren't you intelligent enough to know I was the one that posted the court documents - and paid for it on MY DIME?
*/
I'm aware of you buying the documents, and posting them. (Didn't you ask for a donation, at one time, to see them?)
/*
You don't know who sued for back pay?
My, oh my!
*/
I think a Mr. Fontenont, maybe 2 more, and I thought YOU as well.
------------------
You've THOUGHT wrong - I deal in FACTS!
The court docs were made avilable publicly - try the amigabk directory.
Do your searches to find out where it is and how to get it. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 107 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Atheist2 on 17-Nov-2003 07:42 GMT | In reply to Comment 106 (Rich Woods):
Okay, I give up, why do you keep posting about AInc.'s days in court? |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 108 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 07:48 GMT | In reply to Comment 107 (Atheist2):
Posted by Atheist2 (24.69.255.237) on 17-Nov-2003 08:42:47
In Reply to Comment 106:
Okay, I give up, why do you keep posting about AInc.'s days in court?
----------------------
Give me 5 answers on why I might. We'll take it from there.
Be realistic - be legalistic - be smart - be aware - and act like an adult. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 109 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by TheRealNapster on 17-Nov-2003 07:55 GMT | In reply to Comment 107 (Atheist2):
@Atheist2
Apparently he's incapable of answering questions. Big surprise.
Whatever... |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 110 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Atheist2 on 17-Nov-2003 07:59 GMT | In reply to Comment 108 (Rich Woods):
Well, thinking you were an ex-employee, and had sued for unpaid wages, was wrong.
2) C.A.M. member, and didn't get a T-shirt?
3) AmigaDE SDK purchaser and feel that you didn't get your money's worth (product wasn't as good as claimed, in your eyes)?
4) AmigaDE SDK purchaser, and feel that customer support was poor/non-existant?
5) ....
I don't know. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 111 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Anonymous on 17-Nov-2003 08:04 GMT | In reply to Comment 108 (Rich Woods):
Forget it - Rich is quite happy in his conviction that he's the champion of justice for all the huddled masses out there. Heh, maybe he did once try to be a PI but flunked out, that would explain a few things. He's on slippery ground though, one of these days someone is going to call the cops on him, and all the prosecuting attorney is going to need to convince any jury, are his rantings on moobunny and here (and he's made plenty of enemies, who'd be only too glad to provide the links). I don't think "but he's scamming all these poor, poor people out of $50" is going to make for very good extenuating circumstances... |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 112 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 08:31 GMT | In reply to Comment 111 (Anonymous):
Posted by Anonymous (4.33.151.136) on 17-Nov-2003 09:04:00
In Reply to Comment 108:
Forget it - Rich is quite happy in his conviction that he's the champion of justice for all the huddled masses out there. Heh, maybe he did once try to be a PI but flunked out, that would explain a few things. He's on slippery ground though, one of these days someone is going to call the cops on him, and all the prosecuting attorney is going to need to convince any jury, are his rantings on moobunny and here (and he's made plenty of enemies, who'd be only too glad to provide the links). I don't think "but he's scamming all these poor, poor people out of $50" is going to make for very good extenuating circumstances...
------------------
Oh - goody - RUN IT! |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 113 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Christian Kemp on 17-Nov-2003 08:41 GMT | | Rich, "TheRealNapster" - please take it to email. Also, TRN, please consider this a warning... if you only applied to be a trusted user to post flamebait and engage in long-drawn personal fights, I might just as well revoke your access. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 114 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 08:44 GMT | In reply to Comment 110 (Atheist2):
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 110 of 111
Posted by Atheist2 (24.69.255.237) on 17-Nov-2003 08:59:40
In Reply to Comment 108:
Well, thinking you were an ex-employee, and had sued for unpaid wages, was wrong.
2) C.A.M. member, and didn't get a T-shirt?
3) AmigaDE SDK purchaser and feel that you didn't get your money's worth (product wasn't as good as claimed, in your eyes)?
4) AmigaDE SDK purchaser, and feel that customer support was poor/non-existant?
5) ....
I don't know.
-----------------
I don't know is a good answer! It shows that you still have some cranial matter functioning!
Actually I paid The World of Merlancia $107.50? or thereabouts for the Amiga SDK with the promise of OS4.0 in June of 2001. The World of Merlancia blew me off and never delivered. Voice mail confirmation and acknowledgable voice mail message of course.
Amiga still or has proclaimed The World of Merlancia as a "dealer" even though they have had not delivered on my Amiga product.
UNDERSTAND THIS WELL CRETINS - AMIGA INC IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FAILURE OF THE WORLD OF MERLANCIA FOR NOT DELIVERING MY PRODUCT. They are 2 seperate entities in this business transaction.
Even though they have acknowledged The World of Merlancia as one of their dealers. The World of Merlancia, LLC is registered to Rich Woods of Phoenix, AZ.
The Czerwinski's have NO ties to the new World of Merlancia, LLC.
So let the all-unknowing or (uneead) attempt to make a relationship on this undone transaction.
Is anyone going to understand that I am stating that Amiga, Inc has little liability for their dealers actions?
Oh what a tangeled web we weave.... |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 115 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 08:47 GMT | In reply to Comment 113 (Christian Kemp):
Posted by Christian Kemp (Trusted user) on 17-Nov-2003 09:41:20
Rich, "TheRealNapster" - please take it to email. Also, TRN, please consider this a warning... if you only applied to be a trusted user to post flamebait and engage in long-drawn personal fights, I might just as well revoke your access.
----------------
Thank you. It IS getting out of hand. My IP address is public and I DO NOT post under false or proxied addresses.
Consider my replies or posts to be finsihed to TRN as of now.
Thank you. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 116 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Matt Parsons on 17-Nov-2003 09:06 GMT | In reply to Comment 45 (IanS):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is anyone else sick of this sh*t?
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Nope, I am facinated by it!! I don't watch my TV, so this is my best source of entertainment :-) We all need Soaps :-D
It seems you just want to bury your head in the sand and pretend that this isn't happening (I remember that Feeling during the demise of Commodore). But this is happening, you can stop it (unless you have a spare $4 Million lying around), so it back and enjoy it :-) |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 117 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 09:32 GMT | In reply to Comment 116 (Matt Parsons):
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 116 of 116
Posted by Matt Parsons (62.140.196.133) on 17-Nov-2003 10:06:37
In Reply to Comment 45:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Is anyone else sick of this sh*t?
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Nope, I am facinated by it!! I don't watch my TV, so this is my best source of entertainment :-) We all need Soaps :-D
It seems you just want to bury your head in the sand and pretend that this isn't happening (I remember that Feeling during the demise of Commodore). But this is happening, you can stop it (unless you have a spare $4 Million lying around), so it back and enjoy it :-)
--------------------
You don't watch TV also? I like Discovery channel myself. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 118 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by IanS on 17-Nov-2003 09:38 GMT | In reply to Comment 116 (Matt Parsons):
I can assure you there's a big difference between "burying my head in the sand" and just not giving a sh!t.
Plain and simple - I couldn't give a monkeys! :-) |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 119 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Matt Parsons on 17-Nov-2003 10:30 GMT | In reply to Comment 118 (IanS):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Plain and simple - I couldn't give a monkeys! :-)
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Then enjoy it!!!
whatever will be, will be :-)
I used to watch Discovery, but when I moved the new house was in an area without Cable, so I have to make to with "The Amiga Saga" :-D |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 120 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 17-Nov-2003 10:48 GMT | In reply to Comment 119 (Matt Parsons):
Posted by Matt Parsons (62.140.196.133) on 17-Nov-2003 11:30:42
In Reply to Comment 118:
I used to watch Discovery, but when I moved the new house was in an area without Cable, so I have to make to with "The Amiga Saga" :-D
--------------
Wait for the movie! |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 121 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Matt Parsons on 17-Nov-2003 10:51 GMT | In reply to Comment 120 (Rich Woods):
Maybe if I do a Peer to Peer file share search I'll find an illegal DVD Rip of "The Amiga Saga". Then I can download it, watch it and find out how this ends before any of you!! ;-) |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 122 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Amon_Re on 17-Nov-2003 11:55 GMT | In reply to Comment 20 (Eva):
Eva, like you my native tongue isn't english, and i'm not 100% of what a summery judgement implies, so i asked.
When in doubt, ask
Cheers |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 123 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by gary_c on 17-Nov-2003 13:41 GMT | In reply to Comment 95 (TheRealNapster):
TheRealNapster wrote:
> Defend him all you want. I might a post that had nothing to do with him in response to something someone else posted.
[...]
Why did he do this? I don't know. But I don't see how you can say it was me starting something with him.
Well, that was a pretty mild reaction to your post, not exactly a trigger for an escalation, in my opinion. But I guess we all have our breaking points.
-- gary_c |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 124 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by samface on 17-Nov-2003 14:17 GMT | I'd say let's delete this entire thread, it's not even news since I beat Rich Woods to posting those court documents.
Everything is available at:
http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic/
Or as an alternate URL due to some DNS related problems:
http://mindrelease.mine.nu/amiga-thendic/ |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 125 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by gary_c on 17-Nov-2003 14:34 GMT | In reply to Comment 85 (TheRealNapster):
TheRealNapster wrote:
>> (BTW, speaking of "real identities," aren't you the former AmigaGuy?)
-------------
> Yes I am. Been hanging out at AmigaWorld.net? :)
Hanging out? No. Irreconcilable differences, I'm afraid. But I drop by once in a while to check out the more entertaining threads.
-- gary_c
-- gary_c |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 126 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by samface on 17-Nov-2003 14:40 GMT | In reply to Comment 124 (samface):
BTW, as an ironic fact, the hearing is on my birthday. =)
How old? That is for me to know and for you to guess. :-P |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 127 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Jupp3 on 17-Nov-2003 15:47 GMT | In reply to Comment 120 (Rich Woods):
@ Rich Woods
Thank you for bringing the facts about to case for everyone to see. It sure has coused LOTS of arguing, but I think it's still better, that we DO know the truth... |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 128 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Matt Parsons on 17-Nov-2003 15:50 GMT | In reply to Comment 124 (samface):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'd say let's delete this entire thread, it's not even news since I beat Rich Woods to posting those court documents.
Everything is available at:
http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic/
Or as an alternate URL due to some DNS related problems:
http://mindrelease.mine.nu/amiga-thendic/
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
But Samface, what if I don't trust your version of the court documents? You might have altered them or even hidden some pages :-(
I prefer to have two sources of info ;-) |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 129 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by T_Bone on 17-Nov-2003 16:06 GMT | 4 more days in this cliffhanger.
Will Amiga get a new lawyer?
Will the evil Dr Genesi win in court?
Is Samface the father of Eva's child?
Find out in the next episode of As the Boingball turns... |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 130 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Gregg on 17-Nov-2003 16:27 GMT | In reply to Comment 129 (T_Bone):
> Find out in the next episode of As the Boingball turns...
"Spins", shurely?
Gregg
P.S. Thanks, The RealNapster, for adding yourself to my humble little ANN Idiot File; you're in fine company with samface, Darrin and Eva. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 131 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by samface on 17-Nov-2003 16:39 GMT | In reply to Comment 128 (Matt Parsons):
It's perfectly normal practice, especially when it comes to the law, to verify the authenticity of everything used as evidence. Rich Woods has never given us anything else besides his word that his documents are for real. Add to that, he never made it a secret that some parts are not available to everyone and kept password protected on his website.
You're of course fully entitled to question my sources just as I'm entitled to question his. Sign up for a PACER account (free and available for all) at https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/regform.html, then login with your username and password in the Western District of Washington's CM/ECF at https://ecf.wawd.uscourts.gov/. The case number is 2:03-cv-00003-RSL. There you will find everything I have on my website and there you have your verification wether they are modified or not.
Now tell me if you notice any differences in Rich Wood's and my way of handling people's request for verification of the documents authenticity. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 132 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by samface on 17-Nov-2003 16:51 GMT | In reply to Comment 130 (Gregg):
Hi, my name is Sammy Nordström AKA "Samface", do I know you? Regardless, I seriously doubt that you would know me enough to classify my psychological state. Thank you for adding yourself to my humble little ANN prejudgemental people file. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 133 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by TheRealNapster on 17-Nov-2003 17:03 GMT | In reply to Comment 130 (Gregg):
@ Gregg
>>Thanks, The RealNapster, for adding yourself to my humble little ANN Idiot File
Maybe I over-reacted to how Rich Woods treated me. The thing that was getting me upset was he wouldn't even explain to me why he said hurtful things for no reason at all.
Doesn't it matter to anyone that you can't even post a comment to somebody with out being attacked by Rich?
Why is it O.K. for him to attack a complete stranger, but soooo wrong for me to get upset about it? |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 134 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by DaveP on 17-Nov-2003 17:32 GMT | In reply to Comment 133 (TheRealNapster):
;-) |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 135 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by John Block on 17-Nov-2003 17:43 GMT | Rich is providing a service bringing to light news which we would otherwise not have known about.
The personal slanging matches in the comments are a sad waste of time.
Some of us are time poor and look on visiting ANN as a treat.
It is depressing that a few unthinking people spoil it. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 136 of 263 | ANN.lu |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 137 of 263 | ANN.lu |
Message removed by Christian Kemp for violation of ANN's posting rules.
Specific reason from moderator: Flamebait |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 138 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Gregg on 17-Nov-2003 18:10 GMT | In reply to Comment 132 (samface):
Sammy, I'm not sure what you mean by "prejudgemental", but I feel it is certainly fair to judge you on your postings to ANN, with respect to whether I should expend time and energy reading such posts. This is what I meant by "Idiot File"; I apologise for using inflammatory and unnecessarily insulting language - should have just called it my "Ignore File" (this reply notwithstanding).
Gregg |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 139 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by samface on 17-Nov-2003 18:17 GMT | In reply to Comment 135 (John Block):
>Rich is providing a service bringing to light news which we would otherwise
>not have known about.
It's not so much about what he is doing, it's more about how he is doing it. That's why I chose to not depend on his "services". |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 140 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Gregg on 17-Nov-2003 18:19 GMT | In reply to Comment 136 (TheRealNapster):
Yeah, what he said - thanks, John.
TRN, you should have realised by now that it is very easy to misinterpret things on the Internet; you didn't need to take umbrage, and you certainly didn't need to burn up this thread with your reaction.
My advice for what it it is worth : if you're irritated, write your reply, then sit on it; after cooling off, go back and review both the original perceived slight and your response. If everything still looks the same, then go ahead and post; otherwise, just have a laugh.
Oh, and : "Do as I say, not as I do".
Gregg |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 141 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by TheRealNapster on 17-Nov-2003 18:33 GMT | In reply to Comment 140 (Gregg):
@Gregg
>> My advice for what it it is worth :
It's good advice and you're completely correct.
The thing I don't understand is that you're not giving any advice to Rich. If you re-read through the begining of the thread I think what he wrote to me was indeed rude. Then later he replies again,
"Read the original message again, bright one. I didn't post deliver devices..."
"Bright one"? An insult? The post I made was clearly in response to Neko and had nothing to do with him. But he keeps insulting me and I wasn't even talking to him.
It's just irritating that I'm getting a bunch of blame and know one seems to care how he acted (aside from the fact that he started it).
Why is that? |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 142 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by smithy on 17-Nov-2003 19:10 GMT | In reply to Comment 45 (IanS):
@IanS
>Man, just take your own advice and STFU.
>
>Is anyone else sick of this sh*t?
No, I'm not sick that the truth is continuing to seep out. Although, I can see why you are. Each time Rich Woods posts more news about Amiga Inc (news that billyboy and "fleecy" would never tell you), people like you come here and divert the thread from the topic to attacks on Rich Woods. You say the same stuff every time a new thread appears with news about Amiga Inc's position. So that's what I'm sick off. Why don't you discuss the topic instead? That is - the end of the disgraceful Amiga Inc.
But anyway, all of this will soon be over - until then, you don't have to read threads that contain the truth about Amiga Inc, or use them to attack Rich Woods. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 143 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by smithy on 17-Nov-2003 19:14 GMT | In reply to Comment 48 (Anonymous):
>The timing of all these legal attacks is pretty amusing - every time an OS4
>milestone is reached (I believe the one that triggered this latest attack
>was "OS4 is now booting off hard disk instead of TFTP"), we get more "news
>from the court".
Are you accusing the Federal Court of conducting its business to coincide with announcements about OS4? But even if this fantasist theory was true, Amiga Inc has nowt to do with OS4. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 144 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by smithy on 17-Nov-2003 19:16 GMT | In reply to Comment 53 (T_Bone):
>> The timing of all these legal attacks is pretty amusing - every time an OS4
>>milestone is reached
>>
>Are we to believe the judge is in on it now?
First it was Ralph Schmidt's fault, then it was the blue trolls, then it was Genesi, now it's the US Federal Court. Who's going to be blamed next? The only higher authorities left are the Queen and God! |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 145 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Nate Downes on 17-Nov-2003 19:35 GMT | In reply to Comment 144 (smithy):
Then Elvis! |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 146 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by - on 17-Nov-2003 20:02 GMT | In reply to Comment 145 (Nate Downes):
Aliens I seen em wit my own I's |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 147 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Darrin on 17-Nov-2003 20:57 GMT | In reply to Comment 130 (Gregg):
@ Gregg
>P.S. Thanks, The RealNapster, for adding yourself to my humble little ANN
>Idiot File; you're in fine company with samface, Darrin and Eva.
Coming from a total twat like you, that can only be a complement. Crawl back under your rock Gregg. You've never managed to provide anything worthwhile to any thread in your whole sorry existance.
You have my pity. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 148 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Some Farker on 18-Nov-2003 03:57 GMT | It's obvious what's gonna happen. Gensai Gensee whatever is going to get a judgement in their favor, then use that as leverage to quash OS4, or acquire it, cannibalize it, and toss the remains.
Wait for it - it's going to happen more or less just like that. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 149 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by DaveP on 18-Nov-2003 06:04 GMT | In reply to Comment 148 (Some Farker):
On the actual claim, Im not sure how they could get a judgement in their favour, on
pretrial motions it seems like theres more substance to those than the actual case. |
|
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 150 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 18-Nov-2003 06:06 GMT | In reply to Comment 127 (Jupp3):
Posted by Jupp3 (193.167.144.30) on 17-Nov-2003 16:47:06
In Reply to Comment 120:
@ Rich Woods
Thank you for bringing the facts about to case for everyone to see. It sure has coused LOTS of arguing, but I think it's still better, that we DO know the truth...
-------------------
Thanks - and that was my reason for doing this.
Better to have facts to deal with than silence and innuendo by unpaid Amiga people.
Can't argue with court documents. |
|
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
