29-Mar-2024 00:22 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 52 items in your selection [1 - 50] [51 - 52]
[News] Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court CaseANN.lu
Posted on 20-Mar-2004 00:45 GMT by Rich Woods52 comments
View flat
View list
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case 4f1x 44444403/19/2004 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendants Amiga Inc, Amiga Inc re 63 Declaration, 60 MOTION for Relief from Judgment, 61 Declaration, 62 Declaration (Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004) 03/19/2004 DECLARATION of Garry Hare filed by Defendant Amiga Inc re 60 MOTION for Relief from Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Faxed Signature Page)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004) 03/19/2004 DECLARATION of Bill McEwen filed by Defendant Amiga Inc re 60 MOTION for Relief from Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Faxed Signature Page# 2 Exhibit 1, pp. 4-9)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004) 03/19/2004 DECLARATION of Ray A. Akey filed by Defendant Amiga Inc re 60 MOTION for Relief from Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Faxed Signature Page# 2 Exhibit A-1 through E-1, pp. 4-8)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004) 03/19/2004 MOTION for Relief from Judgment by Defendant Amiga Inc. Noting Date `4/9/2004. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: `4403/19/2004)
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 1 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Bodie_CI5 on 19-Mar-2004 23:51 GMT
[sgt Schultz voice]

I know NOTHING... NOTHING!

[/sgt Schultz voice]

What are those numbers? What's this relief thing?
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 2 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Gabriele Favrin on 19-Mar-2004 23:59 GMT
They found a new lawyer. Here there are some details:
http://www.cairncross.com/people/detail.php?id=49
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 3 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Eva on 20-Mar-2004 00:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Gabriele Favrin):
OOoo this is a real news :D Documented and clear.
Thx Poing.

PS
And thx (ironic) to Hyperion and BoumaDogs that fired out Gabriele from Aos4 beta group.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 4 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 20-Mar-2004 00:25 GMT
"MOTION for Relief from Judgment"

Hmm, they are not particularly "shy" considering these latest days of revalations! Will they get away with this *asset stripping*?
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 5 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by the man in the shadows on 20-Mar-2004 00:55 GMT
Here's how it should read:
-----
4f1x
44444403/19/2004

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendants Amiga Inc, Amiga Inc re 63
Declaration, 60 MOTION for Relief from Judgment, 61 Declaration, 62
Declaration (Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004)

03/19/2004

DECLARATION of Garry Hare filed by Defendant Amiga Inc re 60 MOTION for
Relief from Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Faxed Signature
Page)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004)

03/19/2004

DECLARATION of Bill McEwen filed by Defendant Amiga Inc re 60 MOTION for
Relief from Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Faxed Signature Page# 2
Exhibit 1, pp. 4-9)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004)

03/19/2004

DECLARATION of Ray A. Akey filed by Defendant Amiga Inc re 60 MOTION for
Relief from Judgment (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Faxed Signature Page# 2
Exhibit A-1 through E-1, pp. 4-8)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: 03/19/2004)

03/19/2004

MOTION for Relief from Judgment by Defendant Amiga Inc. Noting Date `4/9/2004. Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shukis, Diana) (Entered: `4403/19/2004)
-----

This is getting interesting.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 6 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by samface on 20-Mar-2004 01:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 5 (the man in the shadows):
If you're not happy with just a short description of the court documents, get the actual court documents as PDF files from:

http://www.mindrelease.net/amiga-thendic
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 7 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 20-Mar-2004 01:42 GMT
You forgot the URL: http://www.merlancia.us/amigabk
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 8 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 20-Mar-2004 01:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (Anonymous):
Oops, they're not there yet. OK, I can wait (so I don't have to download and rename cryptically named files from an untrustworthy source).
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 9 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 20-Mar-2004 02:13 GMT
Read the relief request... indeed there are some valid points there, specially about the fact that BB admitted on public fora that the reason behind the case was to just shut Bill McEwen up. Not really a smart move... he practically provided AInc with the cards they needed.

We'll see what happens...
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 10 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 20-Mar-2004 03:14 GMT
In reply to Comment 9 (Fabio Alemagna):
Well, does it matter what's the reason you sue?I could say something fell on my foot this morning and so I got angry and decidedto sue AInc - if you have a case, the judge will probably decide in your favourregardless of your given cause.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 11 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by T_Bone on 20-Mar-2004 03:14 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Gabriele Favrin):
That's their old lawyer too :)
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 12 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 20-Mar-2004 03:18 GMT
In reply to Comment 10 (Anonymous):
>Well, does it matter what's the reason you sue?

Of course it does, are you kidding me?
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 13 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cheesegrate on 20-Mar-2004 03:29 GMT
notice the date of the sale has changed to october 2003 to stop mcewan being charged for perjury? have a look at the gary statement. looks like some fodder for genesi to fight back.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 14 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cosmo on 20-Mar-2004 03:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (Cheesegrate):
> notice the date of the sale has changed to october 2003 to stop
> mcewan being charged for perjury? have a look at the gary
> statement. looks like some fodder for genesi to fight back

Clutching at straws, aren't we? Sheesh...
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 15 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by samface on 20-Mar-2004 04:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Anonymous):
Those cryptic file names are from the PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) and renaming every document would only make it harder to keep a track on the different urls.

Not trustworthy? Well, atleast I let EVERYONE have access to the documents, giving EVERYONE the ability to have them verified with an alternative source of information as they please.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 16 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by samface on 20-Mar-2004 04:01 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (Cheesegrate):
Read: http://www.ann.lu/comments2.cgi?view=1079749535&category=unmoderated&start=1&4#message4
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 17 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cosmo on 20-Mar-2004 04:05 GMT
In reply to Comment 4 (takemehomegrandma):
I really doubt this 'asset stripping' theory you've cooked up has any substance to it. If that was just the case, then there would be no new money involved. In which case, who's paying the lawyers?
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 18 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by samface on 20-Mar-2004 04:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (samface):
BTW, if you do happen to have 111 name suggestions for 111 different files, please let me know.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 19 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by samface on 20-Mar-2004 04:16 GMT
In reply to Comment 18 (samface):
Correction: That should be 103 unique PDF files.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 20 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cosmo on 20-Mar-2004 04:25 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (samface):
> Those cryptic file names are from the PACER (Public Access to
> Court Electronic Records) and renaming every document would
> only make it harder to keep a track on the different urls.

Doesn't really matter, since the documents are clearly presented on a webpage and in numerical order of submission.

Which raises a question: didn't BBRV submit something yesterday? ("Knockout punch" or some such.) So how come that hasn't turned up yet, when these new documents today have? Just curious.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 21 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Tigger on 20-Mar-2004 05:27 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (Cheesegrate):
Actually KMOS always bought Amiga OS on October 10th, (the company was formed on October 7th to do that). They bought it however from Itek, LLC who acquired it from AMiga Inc on April 23rd. Thats the crazy thing, we have people arguing that AmigaOS having been sold twice since April while AI have been telling us business as usual (as has Hyperion, Eyetech, etc) is just fine. All the while creditors daily try to get paid their debts from Amiga Inc, and they give away the OS, to someone who then sells it in a stock only purchase to an employee or former employee of the original owners (ie the VC) who may be bankrolled by the same VC.
-Tig
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 22 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Doobrey on 20-Mar-2004 05:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 18 (samface):
>BTW, if you do happen to have 111 name suggestions for 111 different files,
>please let me know.

File1,file2,file3,file4,file5,file6,file7,file8,file9,file10...
I`ll think of the 101 names later ;)
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 23 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Don Cox on 20-Mar-2004 06:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (samface):
"Not trustworthy? Well, atleast I let EVERYONE have access to the documents, giving EVERYONE the ability to have them verified with an alternative source of information as they please."

Just as it is a good thing to have a choice of Pegasos or AmigaOne, so it is a good thing to have a choice of Rich or Samface. Competition is a good thing.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 24 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Don Cox on 20-Mar-2004 06:06 GMT
In reply to Comment 22 (Doobrey):
"File1,file2,file3,file4,file5,file6,file7,file8,file9,file10..."

Hmm. You haven't done much animation, have you? That should be File0001, File0002, File0003 ... to keep them in order in lists.

;-)
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 25 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by hooligan/dcs on 20-Mar-2004 07:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 9 (Fabio Alemagna):
I've been thinking about the same
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 26 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by SlimJim on 20-Mar-2004 08:16 GMT
<Shrugs>

AmigaInc said several years ago, after juste critique, that they should not
comment in fora on the competition. They have (to a much bigger extent than
Genesi at least) kept to that intention. They have received precious little
appreciation from the community over this bone-hard line (for various reasons)
and I beleive they have probably suffered more in lost good-will than they have
gained from that silence.
But at least they seem to be able to reap some advantage from that careful
stance now. Good for them I say. Genesi certainly has not kept quiet about their
competition after all, and I suspect there is plenty of usable stuff to be
found among the plentiful material provided by Mr Buck et al.
.
SlimJim
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 27 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 20-Mar-2004 09:07 GMT
In reply to Comment 10 (Anonymous):
> Well, does it matter what's the reason you sue?

Yes it does.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 28 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 20-Mar-2004 09:10 GMT
In reply to Comment 14 (Cosmo):
> Clutching at straws, aren't we? Sheesh...

No, he has a point as well. The fact is, both parties have their faults, AInc now coming up with something to say only because Genesi provided them with the cards they needed to play, but aside from that, AInc has really nothing to say, and it's clear that the sale was a fraudolent move. The Judge is not stupid, he/she will consider their actions under the correct light.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 29 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 20-Mar-2004 09:17 GMT
In reply to Comment 28 (Fabio Alemagna):
Actually, they had cards before, but now lawyer to submit them remember?
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 30 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 20-Mar-2004 09:29 GMT
In reply to Comment 28 (Fabio Alemagna):
[AmigaOS sale]

> and it's clear that the sale was a fraudolent move.

It surely is not. The case was _NEVER_ about AmigaOS as the latest order by
judge Lasnik just recently verified. So basically, AmigaInc. could do with AmigaOS
whatever they wanted, at any time. Only after the first order on Feb, 19, 2004
Genesi applied for a change of the order to include AmigaOS, not ever once before.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 31 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 20-Mar-2004 09:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 29 (Anonymous):
> Actually, they had cards before, but now lawyer to submit them remember?

All they talk about in the relief request are recent events, things happened during the latest 3 or 4 months.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 32 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cosmo on 20-Mar-2004 10:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 28 (Fabio Alemagna):
>> Clutching at straws, aren't we? Sheesh...
> No, he has a point as well. [...]

His point was suggesting that McEwen had somehow committed perjury by not before mentioning the sale of AmigaOS, and that this was some kind angle for Genesi to fight back with...

I'd that that would be a pretty flimsy case, in the face of the Amiga submissions.

It's just semantics as to whether or not a sale had actually occurred. There are many different ways you can interpret when a sale has completed. Whatever the proper legal definition is, McEwen wouldn't be expect to know it that specific time. Genesi would have to prove that he deliberately deceived the court.

It could just as easily be put the other way around: suppose McEwen testified that AmigaOS *had* been sold in April, when the agreement had been made, but then the deal fell through. (Given the history of such deals in the past, this wouldn't be entirely unexpected.) The same people would be accusing McEwen of perjury in this case too. "He said it was sold, when it wasn't! Perjury!".

As I said, clutching at straws...
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 33 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 20-Mar-2004 10:08 GMT
In reply to Comment 30 (Anonymous):
That is irrelevant, the Genesi case was not the only one AInc has had to face during the past years. They owe money, as per judgements, to many people, the money they earned by selling AmigaOS should have gone to those people. It didn't.

Moreover, After the sale had supposedly already been made, McEwen declared under oath he was the only owner of the rights to and source code of AmigaOS, which now he implicitely admits is not true. There are a lot more of issues like these they'll have to face.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 34 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by AdmV on 20-Mar-2004 10:51 GMT
In reply to Comment 33 (Fabio Alemagna):
All of which is irrelevant. The past is the past, the losses are the losses, and Amiga Inc has shafted a load of assets elsewhere while still owing creditors and not paying.

I can't really put it into words how stupid, and we're talking new deeper levels of stupidity here, HOW STUPID to see these two little companies - already low on monies, FIGHTING ONCE AGAIN, SQUABBLING LIKE PATHETIC, MISERABLE LITTLE BASTARDS - instead of working together.

Just a continuation of all the stupid little wars and idiocy over the past few years. Every single day they lose people who might have once been interested in their work, rather than their squabbling.

Its a soap opera. THATS ALL. The technology is finished, and the talent is a side issue.

AdmV
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 35 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 20-Mar-2004 11:36 GMT
In reply to Comment 4 (takemehomegrandma):
Yadda Yadda Whine Whine.

The question of asset stripping is only a question if/when they enter bankrupty.

Cheers
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 36 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Johan Rönnblom on 20-Mar-2004 13:13 GMT
Bah. Selling stuff is *not* a matter of semantics. There's a precise
point where something is sold, and where it is not.

As CEO you are expected to know this difference.

It is one thing to make stupid press releases of deals supposedly
made, when in fact they are not made (I don't need to repeat the list,
do I?). It's something completely different to swear under oath that
you a) own something that you have in fact sold or b) own something
that you in fact do not own.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 37 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Gregg on 20-Mar-2004 13:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 32 (Cosmo):
It's just semantics as to whether or not a sale had actually occurred.

Brilliant!

Hey, Cosmo - I've got a bridge you've already bought...

How much does one get paid as an AInc. apologist, by the way? Oh, silly me - they're all "working" for free, aren't they?

Gregg
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 38 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cosmo on 20-Mar-2004 13:56 GMT
In reply to Comment 37 (Gregg):
> Brilliant!

I presume you're being sarcastic, and that you actually have a counter opinion to bring to the discussion?

> Hey, Cosmo - I've got a bridge you've already bought...

I don't think your analogy really fits this situation.

> How much does one get paid as an AInc. apologist, by the
> way? Oh, silly me - they're all "working" for free, aren't
> they?

Is it not possible to debate these things without throwing labels at each other?
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 39 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Graham_nli on 20-Mar-2004 13:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 38 (Cosmo):
Gregg just takes one small grammar error in a post and ignores the rest, and then continues to press about the grammar error ... whilst throwing in general insults ... for the next 10 posts.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 40 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cosmo on 20-Mar-2004 14:14 GMT
In reply to Comment 36 (Johan Rönnblom):
> As CEO you are expected to know this difference.

Seems like a rather subtle point that I wouldn't expect many CEOs to be aware of. Specifically that something is considered sold before a full transfer of products/monies has occured, and even when such an agreement could still be undone by such things not ultimately being transferred.

Seems counter intuitive to me, as I would have set the date of sale at the time of transfer of the money. (Presumably it cost a bit more than $100.)

But, for the sake of advancing the discussion, I'll submit to your (expert?) opinion that McEwen was mistaken to state that AmigaOS wasn't sold. But this still brings us back to the original point about this being a rather flimsy issue to base any "fight back" from Genesi, given the shear amount of material that Amiga at al. have tabled.

I don't know how Genesi would be able to *prove* that it was a deliberate attempt to deceive the court, and I don't know what sort of punishment a court would give if it was otherwise regarded as just a mistake from a CEO who neglected to read their CEO-rulebook on the day that they were expected to anwser such questions in person in a court room.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 41 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Johan Rönnblom on 20-Mar-2004 14:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 40 (Cosmo):
If you don't expect McEwen to know what AInc owns and does not own,
what do you expect him to know?

How can we know that AInc owns AmigaDE? How can we expect McEwen to
know whether he actually is CEO or not?


Please. As a common citizen over 18 you're expected to be able to make
contracts. If you can't, that's your problem. As CEO, the justice
systems have additional expectations from you. If you're not confident
handling such matters you should not write contracts, and you
definitely should not accept to become a CEO.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 42 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by IanS on 20-Mar-2004 14:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 39 (Graham_nli):
What I find amusing, is that in his infinite sarcasm, he never seems to add anything to a conversation - even though he makes many posts.

Keep on with the sarcastic comments Gregg - great entertainment mate.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 43 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by on 20-Mar-2004 15:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 42 (IanS):
Oh, you noticed too?
Careful IanS! Gregg is likely to respond using big words in his desire to impress and intimidate, then insist that he's merely trying to 'extend your vocabulary'!
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 44 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 20-Mar-2004 18:10 GMT
In reply to Comment 4 (takemehomegrandma):
Posted by takemehomegrandma (Trusted user) on 20-Mar-2004 01:25:41

"MOTION for Relief from Judgment"

Hmm, they are not particularly "shy" considering these latest days of revalations! Will they get away with this *asset stripping*?
--------------------
sorry for the mess. Was posting with the URL's for the documents and my system crashed.

Took about 40-50 reboots - wasn't getting the nosie when the graphics card was supposed to swithc in - NOTHING!

I thought my poor miggy bit the dust!
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 45 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 20-Mar-2004 18:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 2 (Gabriele Favrin):
They found a new lawyer. Here there are some details:
http://www.cairncross.com/people/detail.php?id=49
---------------
Actually this is the "old" lawyer also - but good work - nice to see the shyster's bs.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 46 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Gregg on 20-Mar-2004 18:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 43 ():
C'mon, lads, anyone else want a go? Cosmo, graham_nli, IanS, anonymous coward - should be safe enough to put the boot in now...

Ow.

I think a mosquito just bit me.

Oh, hang on - it was just a gnat.

Now, all we need is my little "French" poodle to pop in with a quick yap or two - if he isn't too busy with his new business, that is...

You know, chaps, if you didn't keep on proffering such laughably subjective and reality-rupturing opinions, I probably wouldn't be posting all this tedious stuff. I'd much rather be expending my limited energies in more constructive ways, but I find I'm easily distracted, so let's try this :

You don't post stupid opinions, and I won't point out your mind-bending irrationalities.

Fair deal?

This leaves you free to stop embarrassing yourselvs, and we can all be a little more constructive. Mutually beneficial*, seems to me.

Gregg

* : anonymous coward, that would be "a win-win situation" (yech!) for you, I think. Please don't take this as condescension; I am merely trying to respect your decision to limit your vocabulary.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 47 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 20-Mar-2004 18:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 7 (Anonymous):
Posted by Anonymous (194.63.235.139) on 20-Mar-2004 02:42:59

You forgot the URL: http://www.merlancia.us/amigabk
-----------------
Just got my miggy back up after the crash when I posting the court docket info. will be up in this section in a few hours. Along with descriptive file names.
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 48 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 20-Mar-2004 18:16 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Anonymous):
Posted by Anonymous (194.63.235.139) on 20-Mar-2004 02:46:26

In Reply to Comment 7 (Anonymous):
Oops, they're not there yet. OK, I can wait (so I don't have to download and rename cryptically named files from an untrustworthy source).
-------------------
I don't like the way the court names it's documents - it is very confusing and it takes a bit of work to rename each one - but it makes it easier to know what is in the document.

Since my miggy was so SHOCKED by the court documents and crashed - it took MANY hours to get her back up - I think she fainted and couldn't be revived - but now she's back.

Give me a couple hours and the docs will be up.

And stay tuned folks - from a "secret" source - there is MORE stuff coming!
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 49 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Cosmo on 20-Mar-2004 19:03 GMT
In reply to Comment 48 (Rich Woods):
> And stay tuned folks - from a "secret" source - there is
> MORE stuff coming!

Does it come packaged in boxing gloves I wonder? ;)
Latest Update on Thendic Amiga Court Case : Comment 50 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by Bodie_CI5 on 21-Mar-2004 00:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 45 (Rich Woods):
Why is it BS? Why insult the lawyer if you don't know her personally?
Anonymous, there are 52 items in your selection [1 - 50] [51 - 52]
Back to Top