27-Nov-2021 18:21 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Anonymous, there are 364 items in your selection (but only 214 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 250] [251 - 300] [301 - 350] [351 - 364]
[News] Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINEANN.lu
Posted on 26-Mar-2004 14:52 GMT by Mikey C364 comments
View flat
View list
Answers many questions, including "That Business Card" Amigaworld.net
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 151 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Bill Hoggett on 26-Mar-2004 20:38 GMT
In reply to Comment 150 (Mikey_C):
Ye shall reap that which you sow. Why so surprised?
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 152 of 364ANN.lu
In reply to Comment 150 (Mikey_C):
Message removed by Christophe Decanini for violation of ANN's posting rules.
Specific reason from moderator: Abuse
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 153 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Gru on 26-Mar-2004 20:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 150 (Mikey_C):
Amigaworld.net and you personally wer part of the cover up for the last year, so what do you really expect?
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 154 of 364ANN.lu
In reply to Comment 150 (Mikey_C):
Message removed by Christophe Decanini for violation of ANN's posting rules.
Specific reason from moderator: Insults
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 155 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 26-Mar-2004 20:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 35 (Gru):
Posted by Gru (216.127.82.97) on 26-Mar-2004 17:13:38

In Reply to Comment 24 (gadget):
Because they are lying. Let me put this in simple terms.

No self respecting business man would make and hand out +CEO+ business cards for a company he had no involvement in. It just doesn't happen. This is so obvious it is painful.
-------------------
Well you can see it - I can see it - maybe someone else?

See Brott card I am about to make public.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 156 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Graham_nli on 26-Mar-2004 20:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 153 (Gru):
Thank you for making every stupid comment in this thread worthless, Gru.

Time to lock this thread methinks.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 157 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Graham_nli on 26-Mar-2004 20:47 GMT
In reply to Comment 156 (Graham_nli):
Ah, the IP address is different. Sorry Gru, looks like someone was impostering as you.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 158 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Kjetil on 26-Mar-2004 20:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 91 (Graham_nli):
I think you are on to some thing hare,

* AmigaOS3.X can run hosted on top of many OS (Windows,Linux,MacOS,BeOS,AROS)
* Tiny compared whit can fit on limited storage (Excellent for mobile market)
* More user friendly then Linux,
* AmigaOS4.0 has memory protection, (and can be scaled to any use)
* Allows for optimized native code on the CPU (ARM,MIPS,PPC)
* AmigaOS4.0 can whit some work run on any cpu whit the same byte order
* 68000 programs can use new features on native library's (ARM,MIPS,PPC).
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 159 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Mikey_C on 26-Mar-2004 20:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 151 (Bill Hoggett):
I don't know what you think I have sown bill, but I realise that trying to talk to you is going to be a pointless exercise.
As you have so readily demonstrated elsewhere recently.

Sad man.

Mikey C
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 160 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 20:52 GMT
In reply to Comment 151 (Bill Hoggett):
I have had some problems with a few AW.net moderators and users.
However it is bad to generalize. There is definitely some good efforts made to cover Amiga Inc, Hyperion, Eyetech products.
Unfortunately because of what I think have been policies biased toward AmigaInc and associated companies people tend to associate AW.net to the problems they have with AmigaInc and associated companies. Let's hope that this will change now that AmigaOS supposely does not belong anymore to amigaINC.

Some of the last comments were way off limits. If more of these may come they will be moderated.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 161 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Mikey_C on 26-Mar-2004 20:52 GMT
In reply to Comment 154 (Joe):
Care to substantiate your claim? Scum? Pigs? Cancer? Wankyworld? Lies?

Have you people become so far removed from reality that you cannot discuss things in a reasonable and civilised manner?

Sad, very sad :-(

Mikey C
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 162 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 20:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 161 (Mikey_C):
Just ignore the troll. I'm sure you can discuss with Bill H. I had arguments with him but we agree to disagree when required.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 163 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Mikey_C on 26-Mar-2004 20:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 160 (Christophe Decanini):
I am glad to see some reasoned statements Christophe, yes amigaworld.net has got a bias, no denying it, it is biased towards AmigaOS4/AmigaOne, this is one of the main reasons why Eyetech chose to sponsor the site.

We do not make any apologies for that. It is what most of our members prefer. Why change?

There is Morphzone, where people prefer the MOS/Pegasos solution, no one says that it should change and become Amigazone do they? Of course not, each site has it's distinct identity. If some here can't accept it, then I am sorry for them.

Mikey C
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 164 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Joe on 26-Mar-2004 21:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 162 (Christophe Decanini):
I must be a troll for hating being lied to from a site what claims to care about the Amiga. what Amigaworld admins did was wrong and should not be swept under the carpet as usual.

Maybe my tone was harsh but that is how it made me feel.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 165 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Mikey_C on 26-Mar-2004 21:09 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (Joe):
Sorry Joe,

What have we lied about? Care to elaborate? Give instances?

Please, I will answer your points honestly

Mikey C
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 166 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by KenH on 26-Mar-2004 21:11 GMT
On the brighter side, it is good to see there is so much energy around the scene.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 167 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 21:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 164 (Joe):
We don't censor people not agreing with X or Y company. We do censor when flames escalate too far.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 168 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 26-Mar-2004 21:19 GMT
In reply to Comment 52 (Gru):
Posted by Gru (216.127.82.97) on 26-Mar-2004 17:35:39

In Reply to Comment 47 (Darrin):
> You are the one that's ignoring the other 90% of Garry's interview which
> raises some pretty damming questions in order to try and focus on a rather
> small piece of stiff paper.

You mean like coupons which will not be honored and tee shirts that will not be shipped?

In a legal transaction of IP, typically it requires MONEY to change hands. If AmigaOS was legally purchased with MONEY where did it go? It did not go to pay Amiga Inc's outstanding debts. It did not go to pay any outstanding judgements against them. It did not go to ship product they owe their customers, you know shirts and coupons. It was also not reported to the courts. Obviously there was no significant transfer of money for the rights.

Now you tell me, does this sound like a legal above the table transaction from a legit company who's CEO has paraded as Amiga inc's CEO in the past?
------------------
You sly fox! Can't pull the wool (from sheeplord) over your eyes!

If only the blind could see.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 169 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Matt Parsons on 26-Mar-2004 21:24 GMT
Actions speak louder than words.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 170 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by KenH on 26-Mar-2004 21:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 168 (Rich Woods):
[quote]In a legal transaction of IP, typically it requires MONEY to change hands. If AmigaOS was legally purchased with MONEY where did it go? It did not go to pay Amiga Inc's outstanding debts. It did not go to pay any outstanding judgements against them. It did not go to ship product they owe their customers, you know shirts and coupons. It was also not reported to the courts. Obviously there was no significant transfer of money for the rights.
[/Quote]

Please leave my head intact....

But aren't KMOS the financial backers of AI? That would mean they always owned the IP...
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 171 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Hare Gary on 26-Mar-2004 21:31 GMT
In reply to Comment 141 (Gru):
...and the final minor detail that it is now claimed as a gesture of goodwill whether the pre-orders will be honoured or not. You can't blame it on the "new" company if they would be all discarded. AInc is a sinking ship anyway, people blaming them and apologists cheering for the new conmen are all what is expected to happen.
How convenient.
Normally when assets change hand with outstanding financial issues all such issues are remedied in a contract. It is fair to say that it is the case this time as well. In fact Gary does know what is in the contract just does not tell - he will see which version to follow depending on the possible gains strictly. So the pre-orders wil be honoured if it will be if no signifant spending compared to the capital they have and it gains some advantage, otherwise you'd better forget about it.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 172 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Matt Parsons on 26-Mar-2004 21:31 GMT
In reply to Comment 170 (KenH):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
But aren't KMOS the financial backers of AI? That would mean they always owned the IP...
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If that were true, then would they not also be responsible for AI's debt?
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 173 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 26-Mar-2004 21:39 GMT
In reply to Comment 88 (D-Dan):
Posted by D-Dan (81.79.143.103) on 26-Mar-2004 18:35:40

Hmmm - the absurd level of paranoia on these forums baffles me more and more each day.

To everyone that has made claims that Garry Hare lied, that his remarks were fluff, that he has deliberately manipulated facts over the past 12 months, or that he has been involved in extremely closed deals simply to put one over on the competition, I say - Prove it. If you ain't got proof, all you have is a small mind full of conspiracy theories.

In short - put up or shut up!
-----------------
Speak on it my homey, tell us all esse, we need to know - yoah - my MAIN man - duwop on the trewop.....
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 174 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Bill Hoggett on 26-Mar-2004 21:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 160 (Christophe Decanini):
My comments? The strongest thing I said was the "hypocrite" comment, and even that referred more to attitudes than individuals.

As for AW.net, I don't see why anyone would be so offended. I am simply pointing out that you cannot have what they would describe as "positive bias" and be objective at the same time. Any stronger comments than that which may have been made and deleted did not come from me, though I haven't noticed any of my comments gone.

I did say that Garry Hare's explanation for what has been going on really requires verification, particularly when it gets used to lambast others as a result of what he said. I don't see anything insulting there either.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 175 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Darren on 26-Mar-2004 21:40 GMT
Just finished reading the Aworld thread and i can not believe the blind ignorance going on there and even here. Garry Hare should not be treated like a hero like the users did with Fleecy, where i come from you have to prove yourself before getting respect and praise not getting a massive fan club just because you answer questions which nobody knows if they are true or false.

I think someone that gives out fake cards and admits it is not a Amiga saviour at all but a fool who ahould not be trust until he earns it.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 176 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 26-Mar-2004 21:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 110 (Graham_nli):
Posted by Graham_nli (81.96.74.103) on 26-Mar-2004 19:02:32

In Reply to Comment 108 (Anonymous):
It also means that you can lie, or spread misinformation.

Please give me a link to the court document relating to the Amiga/Thendic case that proves you right, and Gopal wrong.
-----------
http://www.merlancia.us/amigabk/
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 177 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by KenH on 26-Mar-2004 21:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 172 (Matt Parsons):
"If that were true, then would they not also be responsible for AI's debt?"

I don't know what their oblgations would be. I'm sure if the court judges that AI pay, they will be the ones footing the bill anyway.

This to me smells like a legal way to protect the IP from past contracts/buyout etc. Whether that's illegal or not I don't know.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 178 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Phil on 26-Mar-2004 21:47 GMT
I say trust no company in this market as they all have been exposed as liar in one shape or another.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 179 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 26-Mar-2004 21:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 122 (Bill Toner):
Posted by Bill Toner (38.119.208.42) on 26-Mar-2004 19:47:09

In Reply to Comment 27 (Wayne Dresing, PhD.):
> I think you will not buy any t-shirts, and it will prove to me and the rest of
> this market that you are a fraud!

You're saying that you won't trust him if he chooses not to follow through on someone else's promise? He didn't promise or sell you a T-shirt, Amiga inc. did. He didn't promise or sell a $50 coupon to you, Amiga Inc. did. He didn't promise or sell you a $100 discount as part of a party pack package, Amiga Inc. did. These aren't his promises to fulfil, they are Amiga Inc.'s.

It sounds like he would like to try and appease us by working out some way to honor the coupons and Party Pack discounts. I had long since given up on any of this happening at all via Amiga Inc., and I have two party packs (one Linux one Windows) plus a coupon, totaling $250 in OS4/AmigaOne discounts/rebates/coupons/whatever. But KMOS only purchased the rights and ownership to the OS. Ownership of something does not transfer sales promotions obligations of a product, unless those obligations are agreed to and part of the purchase agreement contract. If that's not there, then KMOS truely have nothing to do with the sales promotions. Amiga Inc. still are responsible for Amiga Inc's sales promotions. You can't blame Garry if someone else's company fails to deliver something.

While I'd like the idea of getting all $250 and a T-shirt, I'd currently consider any partial reimbursement as a bonus to the zero I'd resigned myself to. I'll grumble to some extent if it ends up only a partial thing. Not much I can do about it really. But please try to hold the correct people accountable, and in this particular case, Garry and KMOS are the wrong people to hold accountable. Amiga Inc. are.
-------------------
I'll give you $10 for your "coupons"?
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 180 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by JoannaK on 26-Mar-2004 21:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 175 (Darren):
IMHO this all stinks badly. Ah well, at least this Kmos/Hare can't make things much worse, after AmigaInc allmost everything is better for a change.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 181 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 21:50 GMT
In reply to Comment 163 (Mikey_C):
"There is Morphzone, where people prefer the MOS/Pegasos solution, no one says that it should change and become Amigazone do they? Of course not, each site has it's distinct identity. If some here can't accept it, then I am sorry for them."

Morphzone is about MorphOS. Amigaworld, community portal make people think that anyone is welcome. In fact you are not welcome for example to criticize AmigaInc but it is OK for example to have some threads bashing Genesi.
I'm not aware of hard moderation on Morphzone (bans, accounts lockout, closed threads, edit). Even Shawn the arch bus troll was not moderated.
As you know I have been on the Amigaworld IRC chanel today and I found a lot of fanatics. Some of them had the same IPs as some anonymous posts here. Several links to ANN were posted. I had a conversation with Ben Hermans (Yes he his the anonymous saying I idolize Bill Buck). I thought it was a good opportunity to chat with him on the channel but I was asked to stop (also got threatened to get physically attacked by a user).
After a while I had pleasant private conversations with some people (including you and Dave and got apologies from the guy that threatened me).
I don't say that it does not exist on the other side but it looks to me that it is to a smaller extend (and anyway don't like such things).

It is up to AW.NET team to do what they want with their site but they have to assume the choices they made and the consequences.
I'm against AW.NET bashing but I do understand why it happens and can not moderate all comments torwards AW.NET.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 182 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 21:54 GMT
In reply to Comment 171 (Hare Gary):
Please do not impersonate
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 183 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Bill Hoggett on 26-Mar-2004 21:57 GMT
In reply to Comment 170 (KenH):
> But aren't KMOS the financial backers of AI? That would mean they always
> owned the IP...

Apparently Itec were financial backers of AI, but according to the interview there is no formal connection between KMOS and Itec. OTOH, the amiga.com announcement says KMOS acquired Itec LLC, so someone has got that wrong.

Either way, being financial backers is not the same thing as being owners. AI would have to be a subsidiary of KMOS, which they are not.

We'd all get a far better picture if we knew just how incestuous the relationships between Amiga Inc, Itec, KMOS, Hyperion and Eyetech really are, but I suspect that is one secret that will only come out if there are bankruptcy proceedings to come.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 184 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 26-Mar-2004 21:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 141 (Gru):
Posted by Gru (216.127.68.137) on 26-Mar-2004 21:04:33

In Reply to Comment 127 (Graham_nli):
> Anyway, who were the people who claimed that KMOS was a shell company owned by
> Bill and Fleecy to offload the IP from Amiga Inc? Would they care to comment on
> the interview?

Facts:
KMOS didn't exist before a couple months ago.
KMOS has no products, no website and no public phone number or office.
Garry Hare is a former officer of Amiga Inc (stated under oath by McBill and cards given out by Garry).
The exclusive Amigaworld.net connection.
This transaction was supposedly done in secret, though any right minded individual will admit is smells of a backdated scam.
McBill stating in court Amiga Inc owns AmigaOS, see above.
Fleecy's Fleecyisms for the past year, see above.
AmigaOS is the only asset Amiga Inc had of value, yet no money passed hands in this transaction?

Damn is any of this sinking in yet?
-----------------
Well maybe a LITTLE bit - we will get an Amiga update explaining all of this. Maybe this year, next year - but they will explain this!
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 185 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 21:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 174 (Bill Hoggett):
@Bill

The off limit comments where not yours. I clicked answer but I should have put @ALL.
Sorry for the confusion.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 186 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 21:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 184 (Rich Woods):
@Rich

Please, avoid to quote full comments for every answers.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 187 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Mikey_C on 26-Mar-2004 22:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 181 (Christophe Decanini):
Okay, each side have their own fanatics. It would be worse if such sites did not exist (i.e. Amigaworld.net and Morphzone)

ANN is in the middle of the lot, thus gets all the fights I guess.

As to your point about Amigaworld.net I totally disagree,
What I think people here may not understand is that Amigaworld.net is an Amiga site. By that we mean AmigaOS4 and AmigaOne or Amiga Classic and AOS3.x etc.

I know that this may annoy some people, but to us, Morphos/Pegasos is not Amiga. It is perhaps Amiga like, but not Amiga. Thus, we feel that when people try and use the Amiga name on something that is not "Amiga", they are taking the pee.

Just my two cents, I know it's highly contraversial, but that is how most of us on Amigaworld feel. (I imagine)

Mikey C
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 188 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Graham_nli on 26-Mar-2004 22:12 GMT
In reply to Comment 187 (Mikey_C):
I agree, AmigaWorld.net is a site for the people who like the AmigaOne, AmigaOS4, and stuff relating to these.

I've dissed Amiga Inc. on there several times and not got moderated. Just because someone wants AmigaOS4 doesn't make them a fan of Amiga Incs.

Genesi, Pegasos, etc, are mentioned on there of course - there is cross-over as they are quite similar in many ways, and so you get threads regarding them. Usually very good natured.

I just don't get how it is okay for there to be a MorphZone for MorphOS/Pegasos users, but not an equivalent for the AmigaOS/AmigaOne users.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 189 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Phil on 26-Mar-2004 22:13 GMT
In reply to Comment 187 (Mikey_C):
That site is a disgrace to Amiga users worldwide. amiga company shits on amiga users and somebody speaks out then gets called a troll then his/her comments moderated and warned. it says how good the site it when members have to use another Amiga site to express their opinions about Amiga Inc and now KMOS.

Then you have that nearly a year of lies with the Q&A with Moss which again AW comes out of it smelling of roses, that site has shown its true colors. any amiga website which is personally involved with any amiga companies should not be taken serious.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 190 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by JoannaK on 26-Mar-2004 22:16 GMT
In reply to Comment 180 (JoannaK):
Have to reply to myself.. I realized what's so strange on this discussion... There are soon 200 posts and not a single of them is from Samface.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 191 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by MIKE on 26-Mar-2004 22:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 37 (SlimJim):
Because amigaworld.net is a site setup for these shills? Their interviews Larry King look like a hard hitting serious journalist.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 192 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Emeric SH on 26-Mar-2004 22:21 GMT
"No doubt, I will get flamed for posting this, so be it, I honestly can't believe the attitude of some individuals here. Especially towards Amigaworld.net. Sad! Sad! Sad! :(

Oh well

Mikey C"

Check back the threads where a certain AmigaWorld moderator, in a discussion about the business card declared it fake, refused to even take a look at the scans, and dealt with everyone with a different opinion, or thinking that Bill Buck was not lying as an enemy.

May we expect DaveP to apologise for biased moderation? Now that we know, the card is genuine. Or anyone of you?

May I point out, that recently most of Bill Bucks previous statements turn out to be true, and reality must be distorted by "buggy linux drivers" and "he told everyone he was not really CEO"?
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 193 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Martin Blom on 26-Mar-2004 22:22 GMT
In reply to Comment 190 (JoannaK):
Shhhh!!!
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 194 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by MIKE on 26-Mar-2004 22:24 GMT
In reply to Comment 49 (hooligan/dcs):
Why does anyone believe a word this fellow says? Is it because he mentions a professor who's passion was ethics? Seriously I wouldn't doubt if Bill McEwen authored the responses to these questions, it's in his style. He passed out business cards at a trade show that said he was the CEO of Amiga, but he told everyone he wasn't, yea that's believable, come on guys, this is ridiculous.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 195 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by hooligan/dcs on 26-Mar-2004 22:25 GMT
In reply to Comment 130 (FuZion):
"FFS shut up will ya! You are all a bunch of complaining losers. Garry has explained what happened. Right from the first card he gave out. He didn't run around saying, "Look everyone, I'm the new CEO of Amiga. Come along. Follow me... Yipeeeee"."
------------------------------

I will stop reading the thread here, and continue tomorrow.
Me, loser, as you so nicely put it.. why should I believe ANYTHING Hare says? Why should I believe anything Buck says? Why should I believe anything Moss says?

Yes, my dear boy, they are probably all more or less lying. Hare has as much credibility as the other two I mentioned.. you draw your own conclusions.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 196 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by MIKE on 26-Mar-2004 22:27 GMT
In reply to Comment 53 (Don Cox):
Don, they won't port it to any platforms except the AmigaONE. They are looking to make money on the closed platform that is controlled by Eyetech/Hyperion. They are making the same choice as Apple, smaller market share and higher profits per unit, vs. larger market share and smaller profits per unit.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 197 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Mikey_C on 26-Mar-2004 22:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 192 (Emeric SH):
Isn't it amazing, how everyone is focusing on the physical aspect of the card and not the questions that arise from it? Guess not, I suppose, you are trying to deflect attention from the real issue. Of course, if you had done your homework, you would have seen my post on Amiga.org in regards to the business card.

Still, continue to deflect the fact that this whole embittered war arose over a certain individual mis representing facts and twisting the truth. Had the individual concerened not done so, we would not be here right now talking about the circumstances. Would you care to comment on this?

Mikey C
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 198 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by IceDragon on 26-Mar-2004 22:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 187 (Mikey_C):
Sounds like a valid argument, amiga is a trademark and morphos does not have anything legal in common with that trademark. I wouldn't expect non-biased on morphzone either.

Concerning the hype trying to "identify" Garry Hare as a liar, i have not yet found a single proven lie in the interview. All the assumptions on that are nothing more or less than what assumptions are, non-factual personal point of views.

This guy sure has yet to prove what he can do or offer for the community, that is undoubted. That he is not spreading his whole business plan for the next 10 years with the current situation and an ongoing lawsuit is only a sign that he is actually not so dumb as some people would like to think, (or so stupid as some other involved parties in the lawsuit already proved to be) and more of a businessman than bbrv or McEwen will ever be.
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 199 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Mikey_C on 26-Mar-2004 22:34 GMT
In reply to Comment 198 (IceDragon):
I agree entirely with your points

Mikey C
Garry Hare Interview Now ONLINE : Comment 200 of 364ANN.lu
Posted by Christophe Decanini on 26-Mar-2004 22:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 196 (MIKE):
The difference is that Apple sold a few millions units in the last years. To get more users a <300$ solution would be more than welcome.
Anonymous, there are 364 items in your selection (but only 214 shown due to limitation) [1 - 50] [51 - 100] [101 - 150] [151 - 200] [201 - 250] [251 - 300] [301 - 350] [351 - 364]
Back to Top