01-Aug-2021 14:06 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] I've been had.ANN.lu
Posted on 17-Mar-2004 00:58 GMT by I've been had.86 comments
View flat
View list
I'm pissed. I don't know how else to say it. I willingly participated in the "I Am Amiga" club for the sole purpose of helping Amiga to further AmigaOS, and now I find out that they didn't even OWN AmigaOS when I sent them my money! What right did they have in taking my money under this false pretense? I will never trust anyone in this community again with my money, everyone has turned out to be nothing but liars.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 14pLaYeR17-Mar-2004 00:15 GMT
Comment 2Agima17-Mar-2004 00:28 GMT
Comment 3T_Bone17-Mar-2004 00:38 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous17-Mar-2004 00:41 GMT
Comment 5T_Bone17-Mar-2004 00:46 GMT
Comment 6Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 02:05 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous17-Mar-2004 02:46 GMT
Comment 8T_Bone17-Mar-2004 02:57 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous17-Mar-2004 03:31 GMT
Comment 10Rich Woods17-Mar-2004 03:32 GMT
Comment 11Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 03:57 GMT
Comment 12Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 03:59 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous Cow17-Mar-2004 05:39 GMT
Comment 14hooligan/dcsRegistered user17-Mar-2004 06:10 GMT
Comment 15Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 07:06 GMT
Comment 16Troll detector17-Mar-2004 07:19 GMT
Comment 17hooligan/dcsRegistered user17-Mar-2004 07:25 GMT
Comment 18Don CoxRegistered user17-Mar-2004 07:26 GMT
I've been had. : Comment 19 of 86ANN.lu
Posted by Seehund on 17-Mar-2004 07:54 GMT
In reply to Comment 12 (Graham_nli):
I'm sure that most people are happy that Amiga Inc. and their mixed up policies regarding everything are now out of the picture.

Are they? We don't know what/who KMOS are (or even IF and WHY they are).
KMOS doesn't necessarily have to be much more than an AInc afterthought, a list of names (well, one name so far) invented to separate assets from AInc and keep creditors from getting what they're owed when it's time to jump ship and file for bankruptcy.

It's too early to tell.

As long as KMOS don't turn around and simply kill the AmigaOS stuff (unlikely, as people such as Hyperion appear to be very happy with this new deal) anyway.

There was ominous sounding stuff about a contract involving Eyetech. If that means that the current compulsory "Amiga hardware" licensing/bundling idiocy is still in place, then AmigaOS has already been killed. Just like before this last weekend. But we still don't know what that contract says.

Hyperion "appearing happy" means nothing. They have "appeared happy" no matter what twists and turns AInc have done during their years at the helm. (Or "during their years of lying drunk on the deck somewhere near the helm they bought".) That's nothing specific for Hyperion, if you're unhappy in business you don't necessarily let the world know this, especially not on a corporate fansite (I haven't seen them comment on a real site yet).
Jump...
#33 Atheist2 #55 hammer
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 20Anonymous17-Mar-2004 09:01 GMT
Comment 21Ronald St-Maurice17-Mar-2004 10:04 GMT
Comment 22itix17-Mar-2004 10:16 GMT
Comment 23itix17-Mar-2004 10:22 GMT
Comment 24Johan Rönnblom17-Mar-2004 10:39 GMT
Comment 25Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 10:59 GMT
Comment 26JoannaK17-Mar-2004 11:06 GMT
Comment 27itix17-Mar-2004 11:29 GMT
Comment 28Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 11:43 GMT
Comment 29Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Mar-2004 11:48 GMT
Comment 30Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Mar-2004 11:49 GMT
Comment 31Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 11:56 GMT
Comment 32itix17-Mar-2004 12:01 GMT
Comment 33Atheist217-Mar-2004 12:41 GMT
Comment 34Atheist217-Mar-2004 12:51 GMT
Comment 35Atheist217-Mar-2004 12:56 GMT
Comment 36Atheist217-Mar-2004 13:03 GMT
Comment 37Seehund17-Mar-2004 13:24 GMT
Comment 38Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 13:45 GMT
Comment 39Atheist217-Mar-2004 13:48 GMT
Comment 40Agima17-Mar-2004 15:28 GMT
Comment 41Seehund17-Mar-2004 15:29 GMT
Comment 42Matt ParsonsRegistered user17-Mar-2004 15:37 GMT
Comment 43MarkTime17-Mar-2004 15:43 GMT
Comment 44Matt ParsonsRegistered user17-Mar-2004 15:58 GMT
Comment 45Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 16:02 GMT
Comment 46MIKE17-Mar-2004 16:09 GMT
Comment 47hgm17-Mar-2004 16:34 GMT
Comment 48John17-Mar-2004 16:39 GMT
Comment 49Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 16:52 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous17-Mar-2004 17:25 GMT
Comment 51Matt ParsonsRegistered user17-Mar-2004 17:35 GMT
Comment 52Graham_nli17-Mar-2004 17:41 GMT
Comment 53hooligan/dcsRegistered user17-Mar-2004 18:22 GMT
Comment 54Troels17-Mar-2004 19:28 GMT
Comment 55hammer17-Mar-2004 19:34 GMT
Comment 56iam17-Mar-2004 20:07 GMT
Comment 57Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Mar-2004 22:05 GMT
Comment 58NoFleecyMan17-Mar-2004 23:02 GMT
Comment 59TarghanRegistered user17-Mar-2004 23:51 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous Flounder17-Mar-2004 23:55 GMT
Comment 61Anonymous17-Mar-2004 23:56 GMT
Comment 62T_Bone18-Mar-2004 00:59 GMT
Comment 63TarghanRegistered user18-Mar-2004 01:12 GMT
Comment 64gary_c18-Mar-2004 02:04 GMT
Comment 65boinger18-Mar-2004 02:04 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous18-Mar-2004 02:16 GMT
Comment 67Atheist218-Mar-2004 02:28 GMT
Comment 68EyeAm18-Mar-2004 06:43 GMT
Comment 69framiga18-Mar-2004 07:56 GMT
Comment 70samface18-Mar-2004 09:11 GMT
Comment 71samface18-Mar-2004 09:15 GMT
Comment 72Framiga18-Mar-2004 09:20 GMT
Comment 73samface18-Mar-2004 09:49 GMT
Comment 74Don CoxRegistered user18-Mar-2004 10:28 GMT
Comment 75Framiga18-Mar-2004 10:39 GMT
Comment 76Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user18-Mar-2004 14:09 GMT
Comment 77Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user18-Mar-2004 14:12 GMT
Comment 78Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user18-Mar-2004 14:14 GMT
Comment 79Coupons and T-shirts18-Mar-2004 14:34 GMT
Comment 80Coupons and T-shirts18-Mar-2004 14:38 GMT
Comment 81hooligan/dcsRegistered user18-Mar-2004 14:49 GMT
Comment 82Ronald St-Maurice18-Mar-2004 16:00 GMT
Comment 83Graham_nli18-Mar-2004 16:07 GMT
Comment 84TarghanRegistered user18-Mar-2004 16:12 GMT
Comment 853seas19-Mar-2004 02:32 GMT
Comment 86Bazzler22-Mar-2004 15:12 GMT
Back to Top