04-Aug-2021 16:02 GMT.
[Forum] Internet TV patentANN.lu
Posted on 17-Jul-2004 09:33 GMT by Amon_Re62 comments
View flat
View list
Yet another software patent that shouldn't have been granted :( See here
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Kolbjørn Barmen17-Jul-2004 10:14 GMT
Comment 2Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 10:38 GMT
Comment 3NekoRegistered user17-Jul-2004 10:43 GMT
Comment 4Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Jul-2004 10:45 GMT
Comment 5Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 12:20 GMT
Comment 6NekoRegistered user17-Jul-2004 12:22 GMT
Comment 7Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 12:24 GMT
Comment 8Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Jul-2004 12:24 GMT
Comment 9Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 12:25 GMT
Comment 10Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 12:26 GMT
Comment 11Bill Toner17-Jul-2004 13:24 GMT
Comment 12Andrew Korn17-Jul-2004 13:25 GMT
Comment 13Joe "Floid" Kanowitz17-Jul-2004 13:29 GMT
Comment 14Don CoxRegistered user17-Jul-2004 14:06 GMT
Comment 15Rafo17-Jul-2004 15:07 GMT
Comment 16Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Jul-2004 15:11 GMT
Comment 17Bill Hoggett17-Jul-2004 15:43 GMT
Comment 18Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 15:44 GMT
Comment 19NekoRegistered user17-Jul-2004 17:45 GMT
Comment 20Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user17-Jul-2004 18:00 GMT
Comment 21Bill Hoggett17-Jul-2004 19:09 GMT
Comment 22Amon_ReRegistered user17-Jul-2004 20:44 GMT
Comment 23Kolbjørn Barmen17-Jul-2004 22:56 GMT
Comment 24Darrin18-Jul-2004 02:52 GMT
Comment 25Kronos18-Jul-2004 04:45 GMT
Comment 26Darrin18-Jul-2004 05:11 GMT
Comment 27Amon_ReRegistered user18-Jul-2004 06:16 GMT
Internet TV patent : Comment 28 of 62ANN.lu
Posted by Amon_Re on 18-Jul-2004 06:28 GMT
In reply to Comment 26 (Darrin):
">You mean like the GIF-patents

Nobody is forced to use GIF's. There are a lot more formats out there. If someone designs a file format then why shouldn't he protect it and earn money for it?"

Because the 'net is filled with GIFS already, most people out there don't even know there's a patent on GIF files, and as such, they use the format, forcing others to obtain a licenced app to display them, or to be stuck with ilegal apps or the unability to display the file altogether. Software patents like these are a burden for smaller or open source OS & apps.

"> or C='s "right-click-menu" ?

It was a neat idea. Give the guy who thought of it some credit. OK, that example is a pretty good arguement for your side ;-)"

You SHOULD NOT be able to patent a UI.

">Yes such trivial ones do exists,

Apparently so.

>and more are granted even today. And whats worse is that they last 15 years or more.

But your argument that this should stop all patents is WRONG. Cars are involved every day in fatal Road Traffic Accidents as a result of driver error. So, using your argument, we should therefore ban all cars because a minority of drivers don't bother to follow the Highway Code (or whatever laws your particular country has)."

But car accidents don't have the risk of destroying a whole market, your analogy is bogus. Besides, had there been no "copying" (immitating would be a better word), the computing world as we know it would be completely different, after all Xerox would be the only one with a usuable GUI.

">I don't mind patents for real inventions, like someone coming up with REAL
>artificial intellegence, being protected for 3-5 years, but this patent-
>hogging only for the purpose to artificially protect the interest of big
>companies has the same effect as communism.
>It makes competion nearly impossible.

I agree with you that "patent hugging" is a bad thing, but that's no reason to deprive honest applicants of the protection it provides. What needs to be done is to educate the people who grant the patents about what the negative consequences could be."

Do you know what is involved in obtaining a patent & what the cost(s) are?

">As a side note, did it ever come to your mind that people don't really mind
>the copy-protection, but the STASI-like methods the distributors are useing to
> pursue those they think that might be doing something wrong =

Coded copy protection alone isn't enough. Code can be decompiled/reverse engineered and reused. The idea can be stolen and incorporated into a rival product without the rivals having to put any research into the idea or even spending time producing their own functioning code. Hacked software is just too easy to find."

Kronos was actually refurring to the way corporations persue their copy rights, and how they enforce it upon people, i have internet, i can download just about any cd or dvd i want, yet, i own over 300CD's & 100DVD's, because i buy what i like, now, had i been unable to play DVD's on linux, i would have bought none dvd whatsoever, i bought it, it should be my right to use & abuse my dvd's as i see fit, but the DCMA, for instance, makes playing DVD's on linux a crime, so technicly, i'm breaking the law (had i lived in the states)

"I could easily start a flame war here by suggesting a possible example of such "software", but I wont ;-)"

MorphOS, Lindows, AROS, linux.... the list is huge

">And you should also know that porting OS4 to OF-based mobos DOES NOT mean it
>can't use a dongle ? The piracy-claim is, was and allways will be void.

It's easier to by-pass a "dongle" than it is to adapt a whole OS to work on hardware it wasn't designed for. My "piracy claim" seems valid to me."

It's valid, but unrelated
#30 Darrin
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 29Darrin18-Jul-2004 07:22 GMT
Comment 30Darrin18-Jul-2004 07:40 GMT
Comment 31Amon_ReRegistered user18-Jul-2004 08:23 GMT
Comment 32Kolbjørn Barmen18-Jul-2004 08:34 GMT
Comment 33Amon_ReRegistered user18-Jul-2004 08:38 GMT
Comment 34Kolbjørn Barmen18-Jul-2004 08:59 GMT
Comment 35Darrin18-Jul-2004 09:17 GMT
Comment 36Darrin18-Jul-2004 09:19 GMT
Comment 37Kolbjørn Barmen18-Jul-2004 09:25 GMT
Comment 38Darrin18-Jul-2004 09:46 GMT
Comment 39Amon_ReRegistered user18-Jul-2004 09:51 GMT
Comment 40Amon_ReRegistered user18-Jul-2004 09:57 GMT
Comment 41Darrin18-Jul-2004 09:57 GMT
Comment 42Darrin18-Jul-2004 09:59 GMT
Comment 43Darrin18-Jul-2004 10:01 GMT
Comment 443seas18-Jul-2004 11:09 GMT
Comment 45Darrin18-Jul-2004 11:29 GMT
Comment 46RAG18-Jul-2004 11:59 GMT
Comment 47Darrin18-Jul-2004 13:02 GMT
Comment 48mark18-Jul-2004 20:40 GMT
Comment 49Olegil19-Jul-2004 08:50 GMT
Comment 50ujb19-Jul-2004 13:43 GMT
Comment 51Darrin19-Jul-2004 14:23 GMT
Comment 52Darrin19-Jul-2004 14:40 GMT
Comment 53Fabio AlemagnaRegistered user19-Jul-2004 15:48 GMT
Comment 54Darrin19-Jul-2004 16:14 GMT
Comment 55Amon_ReRegistered user19-Jul-2004 20:03 GMT
Comment 56Amon_ReRegistered user19-Jul-2004 20:07 GMT
Comment 57ujb20-Jul-2004 06:38 GMT
Comment 58RAG20-Jul-2004 09:04 GMT
Comment 59Amon_ReRegistered user20-Jul-2004 10:10 GMT
Comment 60Darth_XRegistered user21-Jul-2004 22:18 GMT
Comment 61Darth_XRegistered user21-Jul-2004 22:23 GMT
Comment 62Darth_XRegistered user21-Jul-2004 22:38 GMT
Back to Top