04-Aug-2021 17:18 GMT.
[Forum] Morphos for x86 at last?ANN.lu
Posted on 13-Oct-2004 05:41 GMT by Cruncher49 comments
View flat
View list
Apparently MorphOS for x86 exists! See here: X86/MorphOS 1 0 MOO! http://www.morphos-news.de/guides/rc5-72/dnet-mos-stats.php Unless of course someone was tinkering with an x86 client to get it to contribute to MorphOS/PPC stats and forgot to change the architecture flag...
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Abuse13-Oct-2004 05:20 GMT
Comment 2Nicolas Mendoza13-Oct-2004 05:25 GMT
Comment 3Abuse13-Oct-2004 05:27 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous13-Oct-2004 05:50 GMT
Comment 5hooligan/dcsRegistered user13-Oct-2004 05:55 GMT
Comment 6miksuh13-Oct-2004 06:13 GMT
Comment 7miksuh13-Oct-2004 06:25 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous13-Oct-2004 06:34 GMT
Comment 9Nicolas Mendoza13-Oct-2004 06:36 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous13-Oct-2004 06:38 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous13-Oct-2004 06:40 GMT
Comment 12miksuh13-Oct-2004 06:43 GMT
Comment 13hooligan/dcsRegistered user13-Oct-2004 06:52 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous13-Oct-2004 07:01 GMT
Comment 15hooligan/dcsRegistered user13-Oct-2004 07:09 GMT
Comment 16Olegil13-Oct-2004 07:18 GMT
Comment 17takemehomegrandmaRegistered user13-Oct-2004 07:20 GMT
Comment 18takemehomegrandmaRegistered user13-Oct-2004 07:34 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous13-Oct-2004 09:01 GMT
Comment 20hooligan/dcsRegistered user13-Oct-2004 09:14 GMT
Comment 21takemehomegrandmaRegistered user13-Oct-2004 09:32 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous13-Oct-2004 09:47 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous13-Oct-2004 10:00 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous13-Oct-2004 10:04 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous13-Oct-2004 10:17 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous13-Oct-2004 10:21 GMT
Comment 27takemehomegrandmaRegistered user13-Oct-2004 10:23 GMT
Comment 28Tryo13-Oct-2004 10:51 GMT
Morphos for x86 at last? : Comment 29 of 49ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 13-Oct-2004 11:47 GMT
In reply to Comment 25 (Anonymous):
Well, it's clear that this idiot is in the blue camp....Don't you think? Maybe this "person" was eager to test his hex edit masterpiece that he has to test it?

Again try to think for once....
#31 Anonymous #32 takemehomegrandma
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 30Anonymous13-Oct-2004 11:53 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous13-Oct-2004 11:56 GMT
Comment 32takemehomegrandmaRegistered user13-Oct-2004 12:06 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous13-Oct-2004 12:28 GMT
Comment 34Stephane Desrosiers13-Oct-2004 13:33 GMT
Comment 35itix13-Oct-2004 13:35 GMT
Comment 36JKD13-Oct-2004 13:45 GMT
Comment 37brotheris13-Oct-2004 13:48 GMT
Comment 38Zylesea13-Oct-2004 15:10 GMT
Comment 39minator13-Oct-2004 15:55 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous13-Oct-2004 17:07 GMT
Comment 41Sigbjørn Skjæret13-Oct-2004 17:31 GMT
Comment 42JoannaK13-Oct-2004 17:37 GMT
Comment 43hooligan/dcsRegistered user13-Oct-2004 17:45 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous13-Oct-2004 18:03 GMT
Comment 45Nicolas Mendoza13-Oct-2004 18:38 GMT
Comment 46Nicolas Mendoza14-Oct-2004 07:11 GMT
Comment 47itix14-Oct-2004 11:28 GMT
Comment 48pixie14-Oct-2004 19:18 GMT
Comment 49hammer17-Oct-2004 21:01 GMT
Back to Top