26-Apr-2024 02:31 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Eyetech clarify similarities and differences...ANN.lu
Posted on 03-Nov-2000 15:55 GMT by Christian Kemp34 comments
View flat
View list
Eyetech Group Ltd have released a new press release, with a factual clarification of similarities and differences between the AmigaOne 1200 & 4000, the Predator, GRex and Mediator boards. It has to be said that this is probably highly controversial material, and that interested customers should also seek third party advice, especially as far as Eyetech's opinion on the Mediator is concerned.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Kojak02-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 2Juergen Schober02-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Time Will Tell02-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Eagle One02-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Kay Are Ulvestad02-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous02-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Richard Brooklyn02-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Richard Brooklyn03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Christophe Decanini03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Chris Moore03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 13Tony Gore03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 14Richard Brooklyn03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Donovan Reeve03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 16StormLord03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Homer03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 18ehaines03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Roj03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 21sutro03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Eagle One03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Kay Are Ulvestad03-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 24sutro04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 26Kay Are Ulvestad04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 27Keith Blakemore-Noble04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 28ehaines04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Henrik Nordhus04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Paul McCord04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Eyetech clarify similarities and differences... : Comment 31 of 34ANN.lu
Posted by Eagle One on 04-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 28 (ehaines):
: Yes I agree, but in the Mac, usually everything is write 100%
: "system-friendly", so things are easier :)
: So, I bet that on the Amiga some old game or demo that you love will
: fail to run on the 68k emul :)
.
>Those are the same old games and demos that break on things like AGA
>machines and any OS version more recent than 1.3. Nothing to do with
>68K emulation.
.
No, I can run these things in my A1200/060 with some help from degraders, TUDE, Relokick 1.3 and so on :)
My point is that these solutions are way too "hacky" to work frawlessly in an emul.
.
>emulator. After all, access to custom chips etc. is still there, so
>it's not like UAE where the whole computer has to be emulated. (But
>even there, UAE has a fairly high success rate last I heard.)
.
I have UAE in my x86 box, it works 'ok' most of the time, but strangely it seems to
like most the usual adf game booting in Rom1.3 mode, than hacked whdload games booting
in full Rom3.1/HD/OS3.1/AGA/gfx card mode...I'm not saying that it don't run the stuff,
it does a fairly decent job, but there's always some glitches here and there: missing song in stage n,
corrupted background in end level, and so on...:-\
.
That's why I always prefer the "real thing", even with some hacks to ensure compatibility :)
.
: But seriously, what else reason Elbox has to let your old
: 68k accelerator together in a full PCI/SharkPPC G3 system? :)
.
>Good question. Marketing? If/when these things actually get released
>we'll see how compatible they are...until then it's just speculation.
.
Erm...I think they're giving more options to the customer... like the supposed "dual working" of both
the G3 in SharkPPC and the 68k in your old accelerator (I've seen Elbox commenting this in theis latest
press release - correct if I'm wrong :)
Huge speculations aside, of course they should keep the old accelerator in the pass-thru or else the
current Mediator users will have 4 nice PCI slots in a not-so-nice 020/2mb ChipRAM config :)
Jump...
#34 ehaines
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 32MagicSN05-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 33victor #05-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Comment 34ehaines06-Nov-2000 23:00 GMT
Back to Top