26-Apr-2024 05:17 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Seagate ST3660A neededANN.lu
Posted on 17-Jan-2001 15:48 GMT by Christian Kemp34 comments
View flat
View list
In the beginning of January, Allan Odgaard managed to short circuit his harddisk. His hope is that someone has an identical harddisk, from which he can borrow the control print to restore his data. "The model is a Seagate ST3660A and the drive parameters are 1057CYL-16HEADS-63SECT-545.5MB." Also see his original message.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1PaulT16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 2yeah, anon16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 3Dave16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 4Christian Kemp16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 5Darrin16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 7Mads Bakholt16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 11Troels Ersking16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 12AdmV0rl0n16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 13the man in the shadows16-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 14amorel17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 16ehaines17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 17Kelly Samel17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 18DanDude17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 19Allan Odgaard17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 20Lightning17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 22Chris17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 24J17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Seagate ST3660A needed : Comment 25 of 34ANN.lu
Posted by Lightning on 17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
In reply to Comment 23 (Anonymous):
yes, but you dont buy a CDR to back up your hard drive(s) - at least i didnt
its just a handy second function for it that has already saved me once from a Diabalo backup that corrupted the file tree - got back 70% from that and the rest from a 2 month old backup of the same partition...
Lightning
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 26Mathew Ignash17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 27PaulT17-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 28Chris18-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 29Ville Sarell18-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 30Lightning18-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 31ehaines18-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 32Alkis Tsapanidis20-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 33AdmV0rl0n20-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Comment 34Johan Rönnblom20-Jan-2001 23:00 GMT
Back to Top