26-Apr-2024 21:10 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga Inc Closes Down Another Pirate BBSANN.lu
Posted on 16-Apr-2001 11:30 GMT by Christian Kemp48 comments
View flat
View list
Via Moo Bunny: Amiga Inc. has closed down the amiga.rulez.org online pirate BBS. A bit of good news for few companies still selling/developing Amiga stuff.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Bianca Campbell15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 2Seehund15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 3Buzzy15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 4Christian15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Amiga Inc Closes Down Another Pirate BBS : Comment 5 of 48ANN.lu
Posted by David Shipman on 15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
If I may play devil's advocate for a minute, bear with me, this is a somewhat controversial opinion.
The ease of pirating software (yes, thats right, "warez") sold more Amigas than any other factor. Case in point : kids. Loads of people had an Amiga to play games when they were young... why did they want an Amiga? Because their friends had Amigas... they could copy games. Simple. Realistically, is a 10 year old going to spend his pocket-money on mail-order software?
I'm not proposing we encourage piracy, by any means... software developers need to make a living like anyone else. Just take a look at the big picture... I know of someone who made the move away from Windows to get a G3 Powerbook. Now he's swapping it for a loaded Athlon box because "the Mac warez scene sucks". He (like 90% of computer users in most countries outside the US) doesn't perceive it as wrong not to buy software; its not an issue. Many people who never buy a piece of software in their lives become advocates for a platform on the strength of pirated software, and while they don't buy software themselves, somewhere down the line, they're bringing cash into the Amiga industry by bringing other people to the platform.
Its all very well and good to say "we don't want these people, let them use Windows". Fine. Thats just a big portion of the market gone... think about it.
Jump...
#6 redrumloa #7 redrumloa #10 Hans-Joerg Frieden #23 Thomas Frieden #36 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 6redrumloa15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 7redrumloa15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 8redrumloa15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 9yardo15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 10Hans-Joerg Frieden15-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 11Michael Jantzen16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 12David Shipman16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 13twice-a-day16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 15Kay Are Ulvestad16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 16Ben Hermans/Hyperion16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 17Hagge16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 18Hans-Joerg Frieden16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 19kriz16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 20twice-a-day16-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 22DanDude17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 23Thomas Frieden17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 24Thomas Frieden17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 25Prefer not to17-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 26Ville Sarell18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 27Splatt18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 28James Whelan18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 29Kay Are Ulvestad18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 30Kay Are Ulvestad18-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 31Splatt19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 32Splatt19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 33Kay Are Ulvestad19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 34James Whelan19-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 35Splatt20-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous20-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous20-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 38Extensor21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 39Kay Are Ulvestad21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 40Alex21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 41James Whelan21-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous22-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 43Harlio22-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 44David Shipman23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 45James Whelan23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 46DanDude23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 47Extensor23-Apr-2001 22:00 GMT
Comment 48Watts04-May-2001 22:00 GMT
Back to Top