26-Apr-2024 03:21 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] New AmigaOS 4.0 ROM Kernal Reference Manuals in the works!ANN.lu
Posted on 24-Apr-2002 16:18 GMT by P Ericson86 comments
View flat
View list
In a recent interview with Hyperion Software, we're told that Olaf "Olsen" Barthel is working on new ROM Kernal Reference Manuals for AmigaOS 4.0! [The "RKRM" books are the official and prime development documentation/tutorial for AmigaOS developers] As some readers of Amiga Network News may already know, Mr Barthel has previously compiled the Amiga Developer's CD.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Elwood24-Apr-2002 14:38 GMT
Comment 2catohagen24-Apr-2002 15:46 GMT
Comment 3Leif24-Apr-2002 16:25 GMT
Comment 4Teemu I. Yliselä24-Apr-2002 17:20 GMT
Comment 5Dagon24-Apr-2002 17:47 GMT
Comment 6[JC]24-Apr-2002 20:21 GMT
Comment 7hweight24-Apr-2002 21:51 GMT
Comment 8Amigan Software24-Apr-2002 21:59 GMT
Comment 9AmiTroll24-Apr-2002 23:57 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous25-Apr-2002 04:52 GMT
Comment 11Ole-Egil Hvitmyren25-Apr-2002 05:36 GMT
Comment 12smithy25-Apr-2002 05:39 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous25-Apr-2002 06:00 GMT
Comment 14Elwood25-Apr-2002 06:23 GMT
Comment 15kjetil25-Apr-2002 06:28 GMT
Comment 16Alex25-Apr-2002 06:48 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous25-Apr-2002 07:16 GMT
Comment 18Michael25-Apr-2002 07:27 GMT
Comment 19Phill25-Apr-2002 08:24 GMT
Comment 20Daniel Allsopp25-Apr-2002 08:42 GMT
Comment 21Leif25-Apr-2002 08:48 GMT
Comment 22Lennart Fridén25-Apr-2002 09:14 GMT
Comment 23Jon25-Apr-2002 09:17 GMT
Comment 24IanG25-Apr-2002 09:47 GMT
Comment 25José25-Apr-2002 09:54 GMT
Comment 26José25-Apr-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 27Lennart Fridén25-Apr-2002 10:06 GMT
Comment 28John Chandler25-Apr-2002 10:07 GMT
Comment 29Ben Hermans/Hyperion25-Apr-2002 10:19 GMT
Comment 30Don Cox25-Apr-2002 10:19 GMT
Comment 31José25-Apr-2002 10:27 GMT
Comment 32[JC]25-Apr-2002 10:54 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous25-Apr-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 34[JC]25-Apr-2002 10:59 GMT
Comment 35Casper25-Apr-2002 12:12 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous25-Apr-2002 12:14 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous25-Apr-2002 12:18 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous25-Apr-2002 12:18 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous25-Apr-2002 12:19 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous25-Apr-2002 12:54 GMT
Comment 41Olaf Barthel25-Apr-2002 12:56 GMT
Comment 42Bill Hoggett25-Apr-2002 13:22 GMT
Comment 43anon25-Apr-2002 13:31 GMT
Comment 44anon25-Apr-2002 13:33 GMT
Comment 45kjetil25-Apr-2002 13:36 GMT
Comment 46Olaf Barthel25-Apr-2002 13:56 GMT
Comment 47JW25-Apr-2002 14:12 GMT
Comment 48Don Cox25-Apr-2002 15:13 GMT
Comment 49Jack Perry25-Apr-2002 15:30 GMT
Comment 50MadGun6825-Apr-2002 15:56 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous25-Apr-2002 16:05 GMT
Comment 52James Whelan25-Apr-2002 16:31 GMT
New AmigaOS 4.0 ROM Kernal Reference Manuals in the works! : Comment 53 of 86ANN.lu
Posted by Olaf Barthel on 25-Apr-2002 16:33 GMT
In reply to Comment 49 (Jack Perry):
> I don't see what all the fuss is about, PDF vs. HTML vs. CHTML vs. whatever.
> Why is everyone acting like Olaf has to pick just one??? A half-decent word
> processor will export to PDF and HTML, I reckon CHTML wouldn't be too bad,
> and surely it wouldn't take a very difficuly program to translate those to
> AmigaGuide or other formats. (...said someone who hasn't written an Amiga
> program in a looooong time.)
Decent word processor? I'm using LaTeX2e, which may not be the best choice
(getting the line breaks right was a nightmare, especially for the RKM
Libs). But looking back at how this used to be done in Commodore's days,
I guess we're all better off with a portable format for the manuscript. The
original text was set in troff format, and the illustrations were created in
a mix of old PageStream and Professional Page -- try to find working versions
of these today!
As for AmigaGuide, I don't think that this is really an option. It doesn't
scale very well, and the most simplistic HTML viewer will run rings around
it in terms of speed and features.
> [..]
> My only request: PLEASE GOD don't make the HTML file one long-a$$ document as
> H&P did with the AmigaDOS manual. My Amiga 1200 didn't have enough Chip RAM
> for it; it was slow as heck to load and render, and completely forfeited the
> biggest advantage of HTML docs IMHO.
I understand that these manuals were scanned and then set in PageMaker, whose
html output left much to be desired. Sometimes you don't have much of a choice
other than to accept whatever the software offers you :(
Jump...
#56 Anonymous #58 SlimJim
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 54Olaf Barthel25-Apr-2002 16:36 GMT
Comment 55Mak7325-Apr-2002 17:37 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous25-Apr-2002 17:51 GMT
Comment 57Olaf Barthel25-Apr-2002 18:34 GMT
Comment 58SlimJim25-Apr-2002 18:38 GMT
Comment 59Olaf Barthel25-Apr-2002 18:53 GMT
Comment 60.jon25-Apr-2002 20:07 GMT
Comment 61.jon25-Apr-2002 21:22 GMT
Comment 62.jon25-Apr-2002 21:34 GMT
Comment 63Anonymous25-Apr-2002 21:35 GMT
Comment 64.jon25-Apr-2002 21:51 GMT
Comment 65tinman25-Apr-2002 21:54 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous25-Apr-2002 22:05 GMT
Comment 67sutro26-Apr-2002 01:04 GMT
Comment 68Olaf Barthel26-Apr-2002 04:33 GMT
Comment 69Kamel Biskri26-Apr-2002 08:36 GMT
Comment 70Ben Hermans/Hyperion26-Apr-2002 10:18 GMT
Comment 71Thomas Frieden26-Apr-2002 11:26 GMT
Comment 72[JC]26-Apr-2002 11:56 GMT
Comment 73Björn Hagström26-Apr-2002 12:07 GMT
Comment 74Lennart Fridén26-Apr-2002 13:33 GMT
Comment 75Ben Hermans/Hyperion26-Apr-2002 13:47 GMT
Comment 76lalala26-Apr-2002 14:00 GMT
Comment 77Remco Komduur26-Apr-2002 16:32 GMT
Comment 78Jane26-Apr-2002 19:28 GMT
Comment 79.jon26-Apr-2002 23:24 GMT
Comment 80AmiTroll27-Apr-2002 02:18 GMT
Comment 81AmiTroll27-Apr-2002 02:28 GMT
Comment 82Anonymous29-Apr-2002 16:11 GMT
Comment 83Iggy Drougge29-Apr-2002 21:50 GMT
Comment 84d230-Apr-2002 09:51 GMT
Comment 85Amigan Software01-May-2002 03:48 GMT
Comment 86[JC]07-May-2002 22:46 GMT
Back to Top