26-Apr-2024 18:31 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] New Rant: "Community Take Control" at Class Of XANN.lu
Posted on 23-Jun-2002 00:53 GMT by Andy Hall17 comments
View flat
View list
Frustration at the current situation put into words, lots of them, some even forming coherent sentences. Check it out on Class Of X here
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Adam Kowalczyk23-Jun-2002 01:36 GMT
Comment 2JoBBo23-Jun-2002 06:38 GMT
New Rant: "Community Take Control" at Class Of X : Comment 3 of 17ANN.lu
Posted by Desmon on 23-Jun-2002 06:44 GMT
In reply to Comment 1 (Adam Kowalczyk):
There was a lot said in the article, in probably too few words, but I'd like to say something to this...
[quote]
The fundamental rift at this point in time is Amiga Inc. supports a licensed approach and there are others who feel "Plethora Of POP" (new recursive acronym)" boards are just around the corner which should be able to run the Amiga OS. Amiga Inc.'s policy is that the OS will not run on unlicensed boards. Period. Thendic/bPlan have stated the Amiga market isn't their primary concern. Skip the petitions, the grandstanding, the endless banter and cast your vote with your hard earned cash. People just need to understand that buying a licensed board supports Amiga, buying a non-licensed board supports someone else. In our tiny community it's impossible to cherry-pick the best software and hardware solutions and support all interested parties.
[/quote]
What the community wants IMHO is access to cheap(er) hardware in order to run their favourite OS. I'm sure there's very few people who would like to see Amiga go down the tubes and many who'd like to see the platform succeed in a big way. By only allowing licenced vendors to seell licenced hardware, the platform itself will relegated to the days of having to buy C= hardware with all the acompanying custom chips.
I'd love to see the "Plethora of POP", with AmigaOS running on all of 'em!
Cache Ya,
Craig.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 4Joe Consumer23-Jun-2002 07:06 GMT
Comment 5Andy Hall23-Jun-2002 10:18 GMT
Comment 6JoBBo23-Jun-2002 10:26 GMT
Comment 7cheesegrate23-Jun-2002 10:30 GMT
Comment 8cheesergrate23-Jun-2002 10:39 GMT
Comment 9cOrpse23-Jun-2002 11:17 GMT
Comment 10cheesegrfate23-Jun-2002 11:58 GMT
Comment 11cheesegrate23-Jun-2002 12:02 GMT
Comment 12Adam Kowalczyk23-Jun-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 13coldfire23-Jun-2002 23:13 GMT
Comment 14Adam Kowalczyk24-Jun-2002 01:56 GMT
Comment 15Andreas Wolf25-Jun-2002 08:34 GMT
Comment 163seas25-Jun-2002 12:17 GMT
Comment 17cOrpse25-Jun-2002 14:34 GMT
Back to Top