26-Apr-2024 03:38 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Files] New web browser for AmigaANN.lu
Posted on 15-Sep-2002 20:01 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä25 comments
View flat
View list
Alexander Weber writes on his homepage: "Path-Amiga is my attempt to write a web browser. It isn't very usable yet, but that will hopefully change soon. I started with this project somewhen in the second half of 2001, because I wanted to learn to write AmigaOS programs with multiple threads. After I had a program that could open and close some windows, I thought I could perhaps make a web browser out of this, just as a challenge. And the result is this."

Download it
Alexander Weber's homepage
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Leif15-Sep-2002 18:14 GMT
Comment 2Leif15-Sep-2002 18:17 GMT
Comment 3cOrpse15-Sep-2002 18:37 GMT
Comment 4Bill Hoggett15-Sep-2002 18:43 GMT
Comment 5brotheris15-Sep-2002 19:13 GMT
Comment 6Sam Byford - Bifford the Youngest15-Sep-2002 19:16 GMT
Comment 74pLaY15-Sep-2002 19:27 GMT
Comment 8tinman15-Sep-2002 20:11 GMT
New web browser for Amiga : Comment 9 of 25ANN.lu
Posted by Bill Hoggett on 15-Sep-2002 20:35 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (tinman):
@tinman
> Shame it could not manage to escape my LAN (although that might be a
> WinUAE thing, I don't have any other networking stuff installed under it).
Same thing here, with a real AmigaOS TCP/IP stack this time (Genesis). I could get it to find the web pages on my local server, but nothing on the outside of the router.
If I may make a suggestion to the author, it might be a good idea to get a small testing team together (ask for volunteers if you don't have enough contacts), and work with those people until you get a mostly functional program together before considering a public release. At this stage, the program is too raw and incomplete to be exposed to critical public scrutiny, which can be pretty damn cruel.
That's just MHO, made in the spirit of constructive criticism.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 10SlimJim15-Sep-2002 21:50 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous15-Sep-2002 23:25 GMT
Comment 12Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Sep-2002 04:01 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous16-Sep-2002 05:01 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous16-Sep-2002 05:07 GMT
Comment 15m0ns00n16-Sep-2002 06:23 GMT
Comment 16TBone16-Sep-2002 07:25 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous16-Sep-2002 07:32 GMT
Comment 18priest16-Sep-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 19John Block16-Sep-2002 07:51 GMT
Comment 20Rik Sweeney16-Sep-2002 08:11 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous16-Sep-2002 09:14 GMT
Comment 22John Block16-Sep-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 23John Block16-Sep-2002 09:35 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous16-Sep-2002 14:33 GMT
Comment 25anonymous16-Sep-2002 15:10 GMT
Back to Top